Cargando…

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization

To evaluate the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with diastolic heart failure by echocardiography and explore the clinical value of echocardiography. From July 2017 to January 2018, 120 patients were prospectively selected from the affiliated hospital of Jiangsu university...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Fen, Liang, Yi, Chen, Xinxin, Xu, Liangjie, Zhou, Cuicui, Fan, Tingpan, Yan, Jinchaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022683
_version_ 1783619371653922816
author Zhang, Fen
Liang, Yi
Chen, Xinxin
Xu, Liangjie
Zhou, Cuicui
Fan, Tingpan
Yan, Jinchaun
author_facet Zhang, Fen
Liang, Yi
Chen, Xinxin
Xu, Liangjie
Zhou, Cuicui
Fan, Tingpan
Yan, Jinchaun
author_sort Zhang, Fen
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with diastolic heart failure by echocardiography and explore the clinical value of echocardiography. From July 2017 to January 2018, 120 patients were prospectively selected from the affiliated hospital of Jiangsu university diagnosed as diastolic heart failure (York Heart Association class ≥II, LVEF ≥50%). The patients were divided into group with LVEDP ≤15 mm hg (1 mm hg = 0.133 kpa) (43 cases) and the group with LVEDP >15 mm hg (77 cases) according to the real-time measurement of LVEDP. Receiver operator characteristic curves of each parameter of echocardiography in diagnosis of LVEDP were compared between the 2 groups. Common ultrasonic parameters such as left ventricular inflow tract blood flow propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, and early diastole interventricular septum bicuspid annulus velocity e’ (e'sep) were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with low accuracy (AUC is only between 0.5 and 0.7). Other ultrasonic parameters such as left atrial volume index (LAVI), tricuspid regurgitation maximum flow rate (TRmax), early diastole left ventricular sidewall bicuspid annulus velocity e’ (e’lat), average e’, E/e'sep, E/e’lat, average E/e’ were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with a certain improvement in accuracy (AUC between 0.7 and 0.9). Propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, e'sep, average e’, E/e'sep have very low correlation with LVEDP (r = −0.283 to 0.281); LAVI, TRmax, e’lat, E/e’lat, average E/e’ and LVEDP are not highly correlated (r = 0.330–0.478). Through real-time left ventricular manometry, multiple regression analysis showed that TRmax, average e’, e’lat, LAVI were independently correlated with the actual measured LVEDP. Echocardiography can recognize the increase of LVEDP in patients with heart failure preserved by LVEF, and estimate the value of LVEDP roughly, which can reflect LVEDP to a certain extent, with high feasibility and accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77177882020-12-07 Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization Zhang, Fen Liang, Yi Chen, Xinxin Xu, Liangjie Zhou, Cuicui Fan, Tingpan Yan, Jinchaun Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 To evaluate the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with diastolic heart failure by echocardiography and explore the clinical value of echocardiography. From July 2017 to January 2018, 120 patients were prospectively selected from the affiliated hospital of Jiangsu university diagnosed as diastolic heart failure (York Heart Association class ≥II, LVEF ≥50%). The patients were divided into group with LVEDP ≤15 mm hg (1 mm hg = 0.133 kpa) (43 cases) and the group with LVEDP >15 mm hg (77 cases) according to the real-time measurement of LVEDP. Receiver operator characteristic curves of each parameter of echocardiography in diagnosis of LVEDP were compared between the 2 groups. Common ultrasonic parameters such as left ventricular inflow tract blood flow propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, and early diastole interventricular septum bicuspid annulus velocity e’ (e'sep) were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with low accuracy (AUC is only between 0.5 and 0.7). Other ultrasonic parameters such as left atrial volume index (LAVI), tricuspid regurgitation maximum flow rate (TRmax), early diastole left ventricular sidewall bicuspid annulus velocity e’ (e’lat), average e’, E/e'sep, E/e’lat, average E/e’ were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with a certain improvement in accuracy (AUC between 0.7 and 0.9). Propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, e'sep, average e’, E/e'sep have very low correlation with LVEDP (r = −0.283 to 0.281); LAVI, TRmax, e’lat, E/e’lat, average E/e’ and LVEDP are not highly correlated (r = 0.330–0.478). Through real-time left ventricular manometry, multiple regression analysis showed that TRmax, average e’, e’lat, LAVI were independently correlated with the actual measured LVEDP. Echocardiography can recognize the increase of LVEDP in patients with heart failure preserved by LVEF, and estimate the value of LVEDP roughly, which can reflect LVEDP to a certain extent, with high feasibility and accuracy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7717788/ /pubmed/33285675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022683 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Zhang, Fen
Liang, Yi
Chen, Xinxin
Xu, Liangjie
Zhou, Cuicui
Fan, Tingpan
Yan, Jinchaun
Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title_full Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title_fullStr Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title_short Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: A comparative study with real-time catheterization
title_sort echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with diastolic heart failure: a comparative study with real-time catheterization
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022683
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangfen echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT liangyi echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT chenxinxin echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT xuliangjie echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT zhoucuicui echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT fantingpan echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization
AT yanjinchaun echocardiographicevaluationofleftventricularenddiastolicpressureinpatientswithdiastolicheartfailureacomparativestudywithrealtimecatheterization