Cargando…
Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
Peer review practices differ substantially between journals and disciplines. This study presents the results of a survey of 322 editors of journals in ecology, economics, medicine, physics and psychology. We found that 49% of the journals surveyed checked all manuscripts for plagiarism, that 61% all...
Autores principales: | Hamilton, Daniel G, Fraser, Hannah, Hoekstra, Rink, Fidler, Fiona |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33211009 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62529 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Letter to the Editor: Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scoring of cleft patients
treated within a regional cleft centre in the United Kingdom
por: Bellardie, Haydn
Publicado: (2022) -
Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals
por: Leisman, Daniel E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Peer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer’s opinion?
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Making the most of peer review
por: Slavov, Nikolai
Publicado: (2015) -
Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal
por: Smolčić, Vesna Šupak, et al.
Publicado: (2014)