Cargando…

Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation

Background: In this pilot study, we examined the effects of ipsilesional high-frequency rTMS (iHF-rTMS) and contralesional low-frequency rTMS (cLF-rTMS) applied via a double-cone coil on neurophysiological and gait variables in patients with chronic stroke. Objective/Hypothesis: To determine the gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindred, John Harvey, Wonsetler, Elizabeth Carr, Charalambous, Charalambos Costas, Srivastava, Shraddha, Marebwa, Barbara Khalibinzwa, Bonilha, Leonardo, Kautz, Steven A., Bowden, Mark G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578127
_version_ 1783619407470133248
author Kindred, John Harvey
Wonsetler, Elizabeth Carr
Charalambous, Charalambos Costas
Srivastava, Shraddha
Marebwa, Barbara Khalibinzwa
Bonilha, Leonardo
Kautz, Steven A.
Bowden, Mark G.
author_facet Kindred, John Harvey
Wonsetler, Elizabeth Carr
Charalambous, Charalambos Costas
Srivastava, Shraddha
Marebwa, Barbara Khalibinzwa
Bonilha, Leonardo
Kautz, Steven A.
Bowden, Mark G.
author_sort Kindred, John Harvey
collection PubMed
description Background: In this pilot study, we examined the effects of ipsilesional high-frequency rTMS (iHF-rTMS) and contralesional low-frequency rTMS (cLF-rTMS) applied via a double-cone coil on neurophysiological and gait variables in patients with chronic stroke. Objective/Hypothesis: To determine the group and individual level effects of two types of stimulation to better individualize neuromodulation for rehabilitation. Methods: Using a randomized, within-subject, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 14 chronic stroke participants iHF-rTMS and cLF-rTMS were applied via a double-cone coil to the tibialis anterior cortical representation. Neurophysiological and gait variables were compared pre-post rTMS. Results: A small effect of cLF-rTMS indicated increased MEP amplitudes (Cohen’s D; cLF-rTMS, d = −0.30). Group-level analysis via RMANOVA showed no significant group effects of stimulation (P > 0.099). However, secondary analyses of individual data showed a high degree of response variability to rTMS. Individual percent changes in resting motor threshold and normalized MEP latency correlated with changes in gait propulsive forces and walking speed (iHF-rTMS, nLAT:Pp, R = 0.632 P = 0.015; cLF-rTMS, rMT:SSWS, R = −0.557, P = 0.039; rMT:Pp, R = 0.718, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Changes in propulsive forces and walking speed were seen in some individuals that showed neurophysiological changes in response to rTMS. The neurological consequences of stroke are heterogeneous making a “one type fits all” approach to neuromodulation for rehabilitation unlikely. This pilot study suggests that an individual’s unique response to rTMS should be considered before the application/selection of neuromodulatory therapies. Before neuromodulatory therapies can be incorporated into standard clinical practice, additional work is needed to identify biomarkers of response and how best to prescribe neuromodulation for rehabilitation for post-stroke gait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77179492020-12-15 Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation Kindred, John Harvey Wonsetler, Elizabeth Carr Charalambous, Charalambos Costas Srivastava, Shraddha Marebwa, Barbara Khalibinzwa Bonilha, Leonardo Kautz, Steven A. Bowden, Mark G. Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Background: In this pilot study, we examined the effects of ipsilesional high-frequency rTMS (iHF-rTMS) and contralesional low-frequency rTMS (cLF-rTMS) applied via a double-cone coil on neurophysiological and gait variables in patients with chronic stroke. Objective/Hypothesis: To determine the group and individual level effects of two types of stimulation to better individualize neuromodulation for rehabilitation. Methods: Using a randomized, within-subject, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 14 chronic stroke participants iHF-rTMS and cLF-rTMS were applied via a double-cone coil to the tibialis anterior cortical representation. Neurophysiological and gait variables were compared pre-post rTMS. Results: A small effect of cLF-rTMS indicated increased MEP amplitudes (Cohen’s D; cLF-rTMS, d = −0.30). Group-level analysis via RMANOVA showed no significant group effects of stimulation (P > 0.099). However, secondary analyses of individual data showed a high degree of response variability to rTMS. Individual percent changes in resting motor threshold and normalized MEP latency correlated with changes in gait propulsive forces and walking speed (iHF-rTMS, nLAT:Pp, R = 0.632 P = 0.015; cLF-rTMS, rMT:SSWS, R = −0.557, P = 0.039; rMT:Pp, R = 0.718, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Changes in propulsive forces and walking speed were seen in some individuals that showed neurophysiological changes in response to rTMS. The neurological consequences of stroke are heterogeneous making a “one type fits all” approach to neuromodulation for rehabilitation unlikely. This pilot study suggests that an individual’s unique response to rTMS should be considered before the application/selection of neuromodulatory therapies. Before neuromodulatory therapies can be incorporated into standard clinical practice, additional work is needed to identify biomarkers of response and how best to prescribe neuromodulation for rehabilitation for post-stroke gait. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7717949/ /pubmed/33328932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578127 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kindred, Wonsetler, Charalambous, Srivastava, Marebwa, Bonilha, Kautz and Bowden. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Kindred, John Harvey
Wonsetler, Elizabeth Carr
Charalambous, Charalambos Costas
Srivastava, Shraddha
Marebwa, Barbara Khalibinzwa
Bonilha, Leonardo
Kautz, Steven A.
Bowden, Mark G.
Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title_full Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title_short Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
title_sort individualized responses to ipsilesional high-frequency and contralesional low-frequency rtms in chronic stroke: a pilot study to support the individualization of neuromodulation for rehabilitation
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578127
work_keys_str_mv AT kindredjohnharvey individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT wonsetlerelizabethcarr individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT charalambouscharalamboscostas individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT srivastavashraddha individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT marebwabarbarakhalibinzwa individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT bonilhaleonardo individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT kautzstevena individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation
AT bowdenmarkg individualizedresponsestoipsilesionalhighfrequencyandcontralesionallowfrequencyrtmsinchronicstrokeapilotstudytosupporttheindividualizationofneuromodulationforrehabilitation