Cargando…
Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557 |
_version_ | 1783619407712354304 |
---|---|
author | Edgar, J. Christopher Blaskey, Lisa Green, Heather L. Konka, Kimberly Shen, Guannan Dipiero, Marissa A. Berman, Jeffrey I. Bloy, Luke Liu, Song McBride, Emma Ku, Matt Kuschner, Emily S. Airey, Megan Kim, Mina Franzen, Rose E. Miller, Gregory A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. |
author_facet | Edgar, J. Christopher Blaskey, Lisa Green, Heather L. Konka, Kimberly Shen, Guannan Dipiero, Marissa A. Berman, Jeffrey I. Bloy, Luke Liu, Song McBride, Emma Ku, Matt Kuschner, Emily S. Airey, Megan Kim, Mina Franzen, Rose E. Miller, Gregory A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. |
author_sort | Edgar, J. Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity in individual cases can be trusted. A challenge to establishing such markers may be individual differences in developmental course. The present study examined auditory cortex activity in children at an age when developmental changes to the auditory cortex 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) components are prominent to better understand the use of auditory markers in pediatric clinical research. MEG auditory encoding measures (auditory evoked fields in response to pure tone stimuli) were obtained from 15 typically developing children 6–8 years old, with measures repeated 18 and 36 months after the initial exam. MEG analyses were conducted in source space (i.e., brain location), with M50 and M100 sources identified in left and right primary/secondary auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus). A left and right M50 response was observed at all times (Time 1, Time 2, Time 3), with M50 latency (collapsing across hemisphere) at Time 3 (77 ms) 10 ms earlier than Time 1 (87 ms; p < 0.001) and with M50 responses on average (collapsing across time) 5 ms earlier in the right (80 ms) than left hemisphere (85 ms; p < 0.05). In the majority of children, however, M50 latency changes were not constant across the three-year period; for example, whereas in some children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 1 to Time 2, in other children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 2 to Time 3. M100 responses were defined by a significant “peak” of detected power with magnetic field topography opposite M50 and occurring 50–100 ms later than the M50. Although M100s were observed in a few children at Time 1 and Time 2 (and more often in the right than left hemisphere), M100s were not observed in the majority of children except in the right hemisphere at Time 3. In sum, longitudinal findings showed large between- and within-subject variability in rate of change as well as time to reach neural developmental milestones (e.g., presence of a detectable M100 response). Findings also demonstrated the need to examine whole-brain activity, given hemisphere differences in the rate of auditory cortex maturation. Pediatric research will need to take such normal variability into account when seeking clinical auditory markers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7717950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77179502020-12-15 Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis Edgar, J. Christopher Blaskey, Lisa Green, Heather L. Konka, Kimberly Shen, Guannan Dipiero, Marissa A. Berman, Jeffrey I. Bloy, Luke Liu, Song McBride, Emma Ku, Matt Kuschner, Emily S. Airey, Megan Kim, Mina Franzen, Rose E. Miller, Gregory A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity in individual cases can be trusted. A challenge to establishing such markers may be individual differences in developmental course. The present study examined auditory cortex activity in children at an age when developmental changes to the auditory cortex 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) components are prominent to better understand the use of auditory markers in pediatric clinical research. MEG auditory encoding measures (auditory evoked fields in response to pure tone stimuli) were obtained from 15 typically developing children 6–8 years old, with measures repeated 18 and 36 months after the initial exam. MEG analyses were conducted in source space (i.e., brain location), with M50 and M100 sources identified in left and right primary/secondary auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus). A left and right M50 response was observed at all times (Time 1, Time 2, Time 3), with M50 latency (collapsing across hemisphere) at Time 3 (77 ms) 10 ms earlier than Time 1 (87 ms; p < 0.001) and with M50 responses on average (collapsing across time) 5 ms earlier in the right (80 ms) than left hemisphere (85 ms; p < 0.05). In the majority of children, however, M50 latency changes were not constant across the three-year period; for example, whereas in some children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 1 to Time 2, in other children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 2 to Time 3. M100 responses were defined by a significant “peak” of detected power with magnetic field topography opposite M50 and occurring 50–100 ms later than the M50. Although M100s were observed in a few children at Time 1 and Time 2 (and more often in the right than left hemisphere), M100s were not observed in the majority of children except in the right hemisphere at Time 3. In sum, longitudinal findings showed large between- and within-subject variability in rate of change as well as time to reach neural developmental milestones (e.g., presence of a detectable M100 response). Findings also demonstrated the need to examine whole-brain activity, given hemisphere differences in the rate of auditory cortex maturation. Pediatric research will need to take such normal variability into account when seeking clinical auditory markers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7717950/ /pubmed/33329127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557 Text en Copyright © 2020 Edgar, Blaskey, Green, Konka, Shen, Dipiero, Berman, Bloy, Liu, McBride, Ku, Kuschner, Airey, Kim, Franzen, Miller and Roberts. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Edgar, J. Christopher Blaskey, Lisa Green, Heather L. Konka, Kimberly Shen, Guannan Dipiero, Marissa A. Berman, Jeffrey I. Bloy, Luke Liu, Song McBride, Emma Ku, Matt Kuschner, Emily S. Airey, Megan Kim, Mina Franzen, Rose E. Miller, Gregory A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title | Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title_full | Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title_short | Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis |
title_sort | maturation of auditory cortex neural activity in children and implications for auditory clinical markers in diagnosis |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edgarjchristopher maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT blaskeylisa maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT greenheatherl maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT konkakimberly maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT shenguannan maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT dipieromarissaa maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT bermanjeffreyi maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT bloyluke maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT liusong maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT mcbrideemma maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT kumatt maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT kuschneremilys maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT aireymegan maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT kimmina maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT franzenrosee maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT millergregorya maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis AT robertstimothypl maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis |