Cargando…

Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis

Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edgar, J. Christopher, Blaskey, Lisa, Green, Heather L., Konka, Kimberly, Shen, Guannan, Dipiero, Marissa A., Berman, Jeffrey I., Bloy, Luke, Liu, Song, McBride, Emma, Ku, Matt, Kuschner, Emily S., Airey, Megan, Kim, Mina, Franzen, Rose E., Miller, Gregory A., Roberts, Timothy P. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557
_version_ 1783619407712354304
author Edgar, J. Christopher
Blaskey, Lisa
Green, Heather L.
Konka, Kimberly
Shen, Guannan
Dipiero, Marissa A.
Berman, Jeffrey I.
Bloy, Luke
Liu, Song
McBride, Emma
Ku, Matt
Kuschner, Emily S.
Airey, Megan
Kim, Mina
Franzen, Rose E.
Miller, Gregory A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
author_facet Edgar, J. Christopher
Blaskey, Lisa
Green, Heather L.
Konka, Kimberly
Shen, Guannan
Dipiero, Marissa A.
Berman, Jeffrey I.
Bloy, Luke
Liu, Song
McBride, Emma
Ku, Matt
Kuschner, Emily S.
Airey, Megan
Kim, Mina
Franzen, Rose E.
Miller, Gregory A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
author_sort Edgar, J. Christopher
collection PubMed
description Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity in individual cases can be trusted. A challenge to establishing such markers may be individual differences in developmental course. The present study examined auditory cortex activity in children at an age when developmental changes to the auditory cortex 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) components are prominent to better understand the use of auditory markers in pediatric clinical research. MEG auditory encoding measures (auditory evoked fields in response to pure tone stimuli) were obtained from 15 typically developing children 6–8 years old, with measures repeated 18 and 36 months after the initial exam. MEG analyses were conducted in source space (i.e., brain location), with M50 and M100 sources identified in left and right primary/secondary auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus). A left and right M50 response was observed at all times (Time 1, Time 2, Time 3), with M50 latency (collapsing across hemisphere) at Time 3 (77 ms) 10 ms earlier than Time 1 (87 ms; p < 0.001) and with M50 responses on average (collapsing across time) 5 ms earlier in the right (80 ms) than left hemisphere (85 ms; p < 0.05). In the majority of children, however, M50 latency changes were not constant across the three-year period; for example, whereas in some children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 1 to Time 2, in other children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 2 to Time 3. M100 responses were defined by a significant “peak” of detected power with magnetic field topography opposite M50 and occurring 50–100 ms later than the M50. Although M100s were observed in a few children at Time 1 and Time 2 (and more often in the right than left hemisphere), M100s were not observed in the majority of children except in the right hemisphere at Time 3. In sum, longitudinal findings showed large between- and within-subject variability in rate of change as well as time to reach neural developmental milestones (e.g., presence of a detectable M100 response). Findings also demonstrated the need to examine whole-brain activity, given hemisphere differences in the rate of auditory cortex maturation. Pediatric research will need to take such normal variability into account when seeking clinical auditory markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77179502020-12-15 Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis Edgar, J. Christopher Blaskey, Lisa Green, Heather L. Konka, Kimberly Shen, Guannan Dipiero, Marissa A. Berman, Jeffrey I. Bloy, Luke Liu, Song McBride, Emma Ku, Matt Kuschner, Emily S. Airey, Megan Kim, Mina Franzen, Rose E. Miller, Gregory A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity in individual cases can be trusted. A challenge to establishing such markers may be individual differences in developmental course. The present study examined auditory cortex activity in children at an age when developmental changes to the auditory cortex 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) components are prominent to better understand the use of auditory markers in pediatric clinical research. MEG auditory encoding measures (auditory evoked fields in response to pure tone stimuli) were obtained from 15 typically developing children 6–8 years old, with measures repeated 18 and 36 months after the initial exam. MEG analyses were conducted in source space (i.e., brain location), with M50 and M100 sources identified in left and right primary/secondary auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus). A left and right M50 response was observed at all times (Time 1, Time 2, Time 3), with M50 latency (collapsing across hemisphere) at Time 3 (77 ms) 10 ms earlier than Time 1 (87 ms; p < 0.001) and with M50 responses on average (collapsing across time) 5 ms earlier in the right (80 ms) than left hemisphere (85 ms; p < 0.05). In the majority of children, however, M50 latency changes were not constant across the three-year period; for example, whereas in some children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 1 to Time 2, in other children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 2 to Time 3. M100 responses were defined by a significant “peak” of detected power with magnetic field topography opposite M50 and occurring 50–100 ms later than the M50. Although M100s were observed in a few children at Time 1 and Time 2 (and more often in the right than left hemisphere), M100s were not observed in the majority of children except in the right hemisphere at Time 3. In sum, longitudinal findings showed large between- and within-subject variability in rate of change as well as time to reach neural developmental milestones (e.g., presence of a detectable M100 response). Findings also demonstrated the need to examine whole-brain activity, given hemisphere differences in the rate of auditory cortex maturation. Pediatric research will need to take such normal variability into account when seeking clinical auditory markers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7717950/ /pubmed/33329127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557 Text en Copyright © 2020 Edgar, Blaskey, Green, Konka, Shen, Dipiero, Berman, Bloy, Liu, McBride, Ku, Kuschner, Airey, Kim, Franzen, Miller and Roberts. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Edgar, J. Christopher
Blaskey, Lisa
Green, Heather L.
Konka, Kimberly
Shen, Guannan
Dipiero, Marissa A.
Berman, Jeffrey I.
Bloy, Luke
Liu, Song
McBride, Emma
Ku, Matt
Kuschner, Emily S.
Airey, Megan
Kim, Mina
Franzen, Rose E.
Miller, Gregory A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title_full Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title_fullStr Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title_short Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis
title_sort maturation of auditory cortex neural activity in children and implications for auditory clinical markers in diagnosis
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557
work_keys_str_mv AT edgarjchristopher maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT blaskeylisa maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT greenheatherl maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT konkakimberly maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT shenguannan maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT dipieromarissaa maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT bermanjeffreyi maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT bloyluke maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT liusong maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT mcbrideemma maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT kumatt maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT kuschneremilys maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT aireymegan maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT kimmina maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT franzenrosee maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT millergregorya maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis
AT robertstimothypl maturationofauditorycortexneuralactivityinchildrenandimplicationsforauditoryclinicalmarkersindiagnosis