Cargando…

Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda

Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Ben Nanfeng, Tang, Ying, Chen, Erica Wen, Li, Shiqi, Luo, Dongying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272
_version_ 1783619418623836160
author Luo, Ben Nanfeng
Tang, Ying
Chen, Erica Wen
Li, Shiqi
Luo, Dongying
author_facet Luo, Ben Nanfeng
Tang, Ying
Chen, Erica Wen
Li, Shiqi
Luo, Dongying
author_sort Luo, Ben Nanfeng
collection PubMed
description Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it has resulted in limited improvement in our understanding of corporate sustainability paradox management. In this study, the authors conduct a systematic review of the literature of corporate sustainability paradox management by adopting the Smith–Lewis three-stage model of dynamic equilibrium. The results reveal the following: (1) Both environmental and cognitive factors manifest tensions arising from the sustainability paradox. (2) While both proactive and defensive strategies are adopted to manage the tensions embedded in the corporate sustainability, the proactive strategy is more extensively studied in the current literature. (3) Management strategies of corporate sustainability paradox are characterized as multi-level, multi-stage, and dealing with multiple paradoxes. (4) Proactive strategies enable organizations to enjoy short-term and long-term sustainability benefits. The authors call for further research explicitly addressing the following areas: (1) the paradoxical nature of corporate sustainability management; (2) corporate sustainability paradox management of for-profit organizations; (3) the micro-foundations of corporate sustainability paradox management; (4) defensive strategies and new proactive strategies; and (5) a unified standard of sustainability outcomes. The practical implications of this review are then elaborated. In practice, the results imply that organizations would best manage the corporate sustainability paradox by understanding the paradox and its equilibrium stages. This review and proposed research agenda are expected to deepen interdisciplinary knowledge and set the stage for interested scholars to undertake in their future inquiries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77179962020-12-15 Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda Luo, Ben Nanfeng Tang, Ying Chen, Erica Wen Li, Shiqi Luo, Dongying Front Psychol Psychology Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it has resulted in limited improvement in our understanding of corporate sustainability paradox management. In this study, the authors conduct a systematic review of the literature of corporate sustainability paradox management by adopting the Smith–Lewis three-stage model of dynamic equilibrium. The results reveal the following: (1) Both environmental and cognitive factors manifest tensions arising from the sustainability paradox. (2) While both proactive and defensive strategies are adopted to manage the tensions embedded in the corporate sustainability, the proactive strategy is more extensively studied in the current literature. (3) Management strategies of corporate sustainability paradox are characterized as multi-level, multi-stage, and dealing with multiple paradoxes. (4) Proactive strategies enable organizations to enjoy short-term and long-term sustainability benefits. The authors call for further research explicitly addressing the following areas: (1) the paradoxical nature of corporate sustainability management; (2) corporate sustainability paradox management of for-profit organizations; (3) the micro-foundations of corporate sustainability paradox management; (4) defensive strategies and new proactive strategies; and (5) a unified standard of sustainability outcomes. The practical implications of this review are then elaborated. In practice, the results imply that organizations would best manage the corporate sustainability paradox by understanding the paradox and its equilibrium stages. This review and proposed research agenda are expected to deepen interdisciplinary knowledge and set the stage for interested scholars to undertake in their future inquiries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7717996/ /pubmed/33329232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272 Text en Copyright © 2020 Luo, Tang, Chen, Li and Luo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Luo, Ben Nanfeng
Tang, Ying
Chen, Erica Wen
Li, Shiqi
Luo, Dongying
Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title_full Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title_fullStr Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title_short Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
title_sort corporate sustainability paradox management: a systematic review and future agenda
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272
work_keys_str_mv AT luobennanfeng corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda
AT tangying corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda
AT chenericawen corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda
AT lishiqi corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda
AT luodongying corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda