Cargando…
Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda
Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272 |
_version_ | 1783619418623836160 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Ben Nanfeng Tang, Ying Chen, Erica Wen Li, Shiqi Luo, Dongying |
author_facet | Luo, Ben Nanfeng Tang, Ying Chen, Erica Wen Li, Shiqi Luo, Dongying |
author_sort | Luo, Ben Nanfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it has resulted in limited improvement in our understanding of corporate sustainability paradox management. In this study, the authors conduct a systematic review of the literature of corporate sustainability paradox management by adopting the Smith–Lewis three-stage model of dynamic equilibrium. The results reveal the following: (1) Both environmental and cognitive factors manifest tensions arising from the sustainability paradox. (2) While both proactive and defensive strategies are adopted to manage the tensions embedded in the corporate sustainability, the proactive strategy is more extensively studied in the current literature. (3) Management strategies of corporate sustainability paradox are characterized as multi-level, multi-stage, and dealing with multiple paradoxes. (4) Proactive strategies enable organizations to enjoy short-term and long-term sustainability benefits. The authors call for further research explicitly addressing the following areas: (1) the paradoxical nature of corporate sustainability management; (2) corporate sustainability paradox management of for-profit organizations; (3) the micro-foundations of corporate sustainability paradox management; (4) defensive strategies and new proactive strategies; and (5) a unified standard of sustainability outcomes. The practical implications of this review are then elaborated. In practice, the results imply that organizations would best manage the corporate sustainability paradox by understanding the paradox and its equilibrium stages. This review and proposed research agenda are expected to deepen interdisciplinary knowledge and set the stage for interested scholars to undertake in their future inquiries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7717996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77179962020-12-15 Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda Luo, Ben Nanfeng Tang, Ying Chen, Erica Wen Li, Shiqi Luo, Dongying Front Psychol Psychology Increasing evidence suggests that corporate sustainability is paradoxical in nature, as corporates and managers have to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals, simultaneously. While a paradox perspective has been broadly incorporated into sustainability research for more than a decade, it has resulted in limited improvement in our understanding of corporate sustainability paradox management. In this study, the authors conduct a systematic review of the literature of corporate sustainability paradox management by adopting the Smith–Lewis three-stage model of dynamic equilibrium. The results reveal the following: (1) Both environmental and cognitive factors manifest tensions arising from the sustainability paradox. (2) While both proactive and defensive strategies are adopted to manage the tensions embedded in the corporate sustainability, the proactive strategy is more extensively studied in the current literature. (3) Management strategies of corporate sustainability paradox are characterized as multi-level, multi-stage, and dealing with multiple paradoxes. (4) Proactive strategies enable organizations to enjoy short-term and long-term sustainability benefits. The authors call for further research explicitly addressing the following areas: (1) the paradoxical nature of corporate sustainability management; (2) corporate sustainability paradox management of for-profit organizations; (3) the micro-foundations of corporate sustainability paradox management; (4) defensive strategies and new proactive strategies; and (5) a unified standard of sustainability outcomes. The practical implications of this review are then elaborated. In practice, the results imply that organizations would best manage the corporate sustainability paradox by understanding the paradox and its equilibrium stages. This review and proposed research agenda are expected to deepen interdisciplinary knowledge and set the stage for interested scholars to undertake in their future inquiries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7717996/ /pubmed/33329232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272 Text en Copyright © 2020 Luo, Tang, Chen, Li and Luo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Luo, Ben Nanfeng Tang, Ying Chen, Erica Wen Li, Shiqi Luo, Dongying Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title | Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title_full | Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title_fullStr | Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title_full_unstemmed | Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title_short | Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda |
title_sort | corporate sustainability paradox management: a systematic review and future agenda |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luobennanfeng corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda AT tangying corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda AT chenericawen corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda AT lishiqi corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda AT luodongying corporatesustainabilityparadoxmanagementasystematicreviewandfutureagenda |