Cargando…

Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse

The sharing of total environmental impacts between the different products of a multi-output system is crucial in Life Cycle Assessment. ISO standards recommend subdivision then substitution methods when possible. Sometimes, allocations rules are necessary. They consist of allocating the total impact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Féon, Samuel, Aubin, Joël, Gac, Armelle, Lapasin, Christophe, Wilfart, Aurélie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106558
_version_ 1783619453327507456
author Le Féon, Samuel
Aubin, Joël
Gac, Armelle
Lapasin, Christophe
Wilfart, Aurélie
author_facet Le Féon, Samuel
Aubin, Joël
Gac, Armelle
Lapasin, Christophe
Wilfart, Aurélie
author_sort Le Féon, Samuel
collection PubMed
description The sharing of total environmental impacts between the different products of a multi-output system is crucial in Life Cycle Assessment. ISO standards recommend subdivision then substitution methods when possible. Sometimes, allocations rules are necessary. They consist of allocating the total impact to the different products in proportion to a value that characterize the products. They can be based on physical parameters (such as mass, protein, dry matter, etc.) or the economic value of coproducts can be used as a proxy. As they are based on various type of parameters, allocation rules can lead to significantly different environmental impact results. Then a consensus is difficult to reach between stakeholders as for example in meat sector. To make the debate going further, Chen et al. (2017) proposed a new allocation method based on biophysical parameters (Chen et al., 2017). Adapted from previous methods, they propose to allocate impacts in proportion to the energy needed for the growth, the maintenance and the activity of each tissue. The method has been judged as scientifically viable but also particularly difficult to apply due to the amount of necessary data and to the complexity of the calculation model. In a recent project, we developed a freeware to easily calculate biophysical allocation factors as well as mass and economic factors to allow a fair comparison: MeatPartTool. We also collected data to create a dataset of mass, economic and biophysical allocation factors for a large range of beef (132 individuals), calf (54 individuals) and lamb (14 individuals) at the slaughterhouse stage. This data paper provides both primary data and calculated allocation factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77181512020-12-09 Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse Le Féon, Samuel Aubin, Joël Gac, Armelle Lapasin, Christophe Wilfart, Aurélie Data Brief Data Article The sharing of total environmental impacts between the different products of a multi-output system is crucial in Life Cycle Assessment. ISO standards recommend subdivision then substitution methods when possible. Sometimes, allocations rules are necessary. They consist of allocating the total impact to the different products in proportion to a value that characterize the products. They can be based on physical parameters (such as mass, protein, dry matter, etc.) or the economic value of coproducts can be used as a proxy. As they are based on various type of parameters, allocation rules can lead to significantly different environmental impact results. Then a consensus is difficult to reach between stakeholders as for example in meat sector. To make the debate going further, Chen et al. (2017) proposed a new allocation method based on biophysical parameters (Chen et al., 2017). Adapted from previous methods, they propose to allocate impacts in proportion to the energy needed for the growth, the maintenance and the activity of each tissue. The method has been judged as scientifically viable but also particularly difficult to apply due to the amount of necessary data and to the complexity of the calculation model. In a recent project, we developed a freeware to easily calculate biophysical allocation factors as well as mass and economic factors to allow a fair comparison: MeatPartTool. We also collected data to create a dataset of mass, economic and biophysical allocation factors for a large range of beef (132 individuals), calf (54 individuals) and lamb (14 individuals) at the slaughterhouse stage. This data paper provides both primary data and calculated allocation factors. Elsevier 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7718151/ /pubmed/33304956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106558 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Data Article
Le Féon, Samuel
Aubin, Joël
Gac, Armelle
Lapasin, Christophe
Wilfart, Aurélie
Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title_full Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title_fullStr Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title_full_unstemmed Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title_short Allocation factors for meat coproducts: Dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
title_sort allocation factors for meat coproducts: dataset to perform life cycle assessment at slaughterhouse
topic Data Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106558
work_keys_str_mv AT lefeonsamuel allocationfactorsformeatcoproductsdatasettoperformlifecycleassessmentatslaughterhouse
AT aubinjoel allocationfactorsformeatcoproductsdatasettoperformlifecycleassessmentatslaughterhouse
AT gacarmelle allocationfactorsformeatcoproductsdatasettoperformlifecycleassessmentatslaughterhouse
AT lapasinchristophe allocationfactorsformeatcoproductsdatasettoperformlifecycleassessmentatslaughterhouse
AT wilfartaurelie allocationfactorsformeatcoproductsdatasettoperformlifecycleassessmentatslaughterhouse