Cargando…
The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review
BACKGROUND: Classifying and diagnosing peripheral vestibular disorders based on their symptoms is challenging due to possible symptom overlap or atypical clinical presentation. To improve the diagnostic trajectory, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear is now...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8 |
_version_ | 1783619465143910400 |
---|---|
author | van der Lubbe, Marly F. J. A. Vaidyanathan, Akshayaa Van Rompaey, Vincent Postma, Alida A. Bruintjes, Tjasse D. Kimenai, Dorien M. Lambin, Philippe van Hoof, Marc van de Berg, Raymond |
author_facet | van der Lubbe, Marly F. J. A. Vaidyanathan, Akshayaa Van Rompaey, Vincent Postma, Alida A. Bruintjes, Tjasse D. Kimenai, Dorien M. Lambin, Philippe van Hoof, Marc van de Berg, Raymond |
author_sort | van der Lubbe, Marly F. J. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Classifying and diagnosing peripheral vestibular disorders based on their symptoms is challenging due to possible symptom overlap or atypical clinical presentation. To improve the diagnostic trajectory, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear is nowadays frequently used for the in vivo confirmation of endolymphatic hydrops in humans. However, hydrops is visualized in both healthy subjects and patients with vestibular disorders, which might make the clinical value of hydrops detection on MRI questionable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of clinical and radiological features, including the in vivo visualization of endolymphatic hydrops, for the classification and diagnosis of vestibular disorders. METHODS: A literature search was performed in February and March 2019 to estimate the prevalence of various features in healthy subjects and in common vestibular disorders to make a graphical comparison between healthy and abnormal. RESULTS: Of the features studied, hydrops was found to be a highly prevalent feature in Menière’s disease (99.4%). Though, hydrops has also a relatively high prevalence in patients with vestibular schwannoma (48.2%) and in healthy temporal bones (12.5%) as well. In patients diagnosed with (definite or probable) Menière’s disease, hydrops is less frequently diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging compared to the histological confirmation (82.3% versus 99.4%). The mean prevalence of radiologically diagnosed hydrops was 31% in healthy subjects, 28.1% in patients with vestibular migraine, and 25.9% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. An interesting finding was an absolute difference in hydrops prevalence between the two diagnostic techniques (histology and radiology) of 25.2% in patients with Menière’s disease and 29% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS: Although the visualization of hydrops has a high diagnostic value in patients with definite Menière’s disease, it is important to appreciate the relatively high prevalence of hydrops in healthy populations and other vestibular disorders. Endolymphatic hydrops is not a pathognomic phenomenon, and detecting hydrops should not directly indicate a diagnosis of Menière’s disease. Both symptom-driven and hydrops-based classification systems have disadvantages. Therefore, it might be worth to explore features “beyond” hydrops. New analysis techniques, such as Radiomics, might play an essential role in (re)classifying vestibular disorders in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7718205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77182052020-12-11 The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review van der Lubbe, Marly F. J. A. Vaidyanathan, Akshayaa Van Rompaey, Vincent Postma, Alida A. Bruintjes, Tjasse D. Kimenai, Dorien M. Lambin, Philippe van Hoof, Marc van de Berg, Raymond J Neurol Review BACKGROUND: Classifying and diagnosing peripheral vestibular disorders based on their symptoms is challenging due to possible symptom overlap or atypical clinical presentation. To improve the diagnostic trajectory, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear is nowadays frequently used for the in vivo confirmation of endolymphatic hydrops in humans. However, hydrops is visualized in both healthy subjects and patients with vestibular disorders, which might make the clinical value of hydrops detection on MRI questionable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of clinical and radiological features, including the in vivo visualization of endolymphatic hydrops, for the classification and diagnosis of vestibular disorders. METHODS: A literature search was performed in February and March 2019 to estimate the prevalence of various features in healthy subjects and in common vestibular disorders to make a graphical comparison between healthy and abnormal. RESULTS: Of the features studied, hydrops was found to be a highly prevalent feature in Menière’s disease (99.4%). Though, hydrops has also a relatively high prevalence in patients with vestibular schwannoma (48.2%) and in healthy temporal bones (12.5%) as well. In patients diagnosed with (definite or probable) Menière’s disease, hydrops is less frequently diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging compared to the histological confirmation (82.3% versus 99.4%). The mean prevalence of radiologically diagnosed hydrops was 31% in healthy subjects, 28.1% in patients with vestibular migraine, and 25.9% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. An interesting finding was an absolute difference in hydrops prevalence between the two diagnostic techniques (histology and radiology) of 25.2% in patients with Menière’s disease and 29% in patients with vestibular schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS: Although the visualization of hydrops has a high diagnostic value in patients with definite Menière’s disease, it is important to appreciate the relatively high prevalence of hydrops in healthy populations and other vestibular disorders. Endolymphatic hydrops is not a pathognomic phenomenon, and detecting hydrops should not directly indicate a diagnosis of Menière’s disease. Both symptom-driven and hydrops-based classification systems have disadvantages. Therefore, it might be worth to explore features “beyond” hydrops. New analysis techniques, such as Radiomics, might play an essential role in (re)classifying vestibular disorders in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-17 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7718205/ /pubmed/33201310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review van der Lubbe, Marly F. J. A. Vaidyanathan, Akshayaa Van Rompaey, Vincent Postma, Alida A. Bruintjes, Tjasse D. Kimenai, Dorien M. Lambin, Philippe van Hoof, Marc van de Berg, Raymond The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title | The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title_full | The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title_short | The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
title_sort | “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderlubbemarlyfja thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vaidyanathanakshayaa thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vanrompaeyvincent thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT postmaalidaa thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT bruintjestjassed thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT kimenaidorienm thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT lambinphilippe thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vanhoofmarc thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vandebergraymond thehypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vanderlubbemarlyfja hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vaidyanathanakshayaa hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vanrompaeyvincent hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT postmaalidaa hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT bruintjestjassed hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT kimenaidorienm hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT lambinphilippe hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vanhoofmarc hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview AT vandebergraymond hypeofhydropsinclassifyingvestibulardisordersanarrativereview |