Cargando…

Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans

Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forcato, Cecilia, Klinzing, Jens G., Carbone, Julia, Radloff, Michael, Weber, Frederik D., Born, Jan, Diekelmann, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4
_version_ 1783619474131255296
author Forcato, Cecilia
Klinzing, Jens G.
Carbone, Julia
Radloff, Michael
Weber, Frederik D.
Born, Jan
Diekelmann, Susanne
author_facet Forcato, Cecilia
Klinzing, Jens G.
Carbone, Julia
Radloff, Michael
Weber, Frederik D.
Born, Jan
Diekelmann, Susanne
author_sort Forcato, Cecilia
collection PubMed
description Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders by inducing a mismatch, i.e. a discrepancy between expected and actual events. Whether mismatch is likewise detected during sleep is unclear. Here we test whether cued reactivation during sleep is more effective for mismatch-inducing incomplete than complete reminders. We first establish that only incomplete but not complete reminders labilize memories during wakefulness. When complete or incomplete reminders are presented during 40-min sleep, both reminders are equally effective in stabilizing memories. However, when extending the retention interval for another 7 hours (following 40-min sleep), only incomplete but not complete reminders stabilize memories, regardless of the extension containing wakefulness or sleep. We propose that, during sleep, only incomplete reminders initiate long-term memory stabilization via mismatch detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77182442020-12-07 Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans Forcato, Cecilia Klinzing, Jens G. Carbone, Julia Radloff, Michael Weber, Frederik D. Born, Jan Diekelmann, Susanne Commun Biol Article Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders by inducing a mismatch, i.e. a discrepancy between expected and actual events. Whether mismatch is likewise detected during sleep is unclear. Here we test whether cued reactivation during sleep is more effective for mismatch-inducing incomplete than complete reminders. We first establish that only incomplete but not complete reminders labilize memories during wakefulness. When complete or incomplete reminders are presented during 40-min sleep, both reminders are equally effective in stabilizing memories. However, when extending the retention interval for another 7 hours (following 40-min sleep), only incomplete but not complete reminders stabilize memories, regardless of the extension containing wakefulness or sleep. We propose that, during sleep, only incomplete reminders initiate long-term memory stabilization via mismatch detection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7718244/ /pubmed/33277601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Forcato, Cecilia
Klinzing, Jens G.
Carbone, Julia
Radloff, Michael
Weber, Frederik D.
Born, Jan
Diekelmann, Susanne
Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title_full Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title_fullStr Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title_full_unstemmed Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title_short Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
title_sort reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4
work_keys_str_mv AT forcatocecilia reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT klinzingjensg reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT carbonejulia reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT radloffmichael reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT weberfrederikd reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT bornjan reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans
AT diekelmannsusanne reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans