Cargando…
Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans
Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4 |
_version_ | 1783619474131255296 |
---|---|
author | Forcato, Cecilia Klinzing, Jens G. Carbone, Julia Radloff, Michael Weber, Frederik D. Born, Jan Diekelmann, Susanne |
author_facet | Forcato, Cecilia Klinzing, Jens G. Carbone, Julia Radloff, Michael Weber, Frederik D. Born, Jan Diekelmann, Susanne |
author_sort | Forcato, Cecilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders by inducing a mismatch, i.e. a discrepancy between expected and actual events. Whether mismatch is likewise detected during sleep is unclear. Here we test whether cued reactivation during sleep is more effective for mismatch-inducing incomplete than complete reminders. We first establish that only incomplete but not complete reminders labilize memories during wakefulness. When complete or incomplete reminders are presented during 40-min sleep, both reminders are equally effective in stabilizing memories. However, when extending the retention interval for another 7 hours (following 40-min sleep), only incomplete but not complete reminders stabilize memories, regardless of the extension containing wakefulness or sleep. We propose that, during sleep, only incomplete reminders initiate long-term memory stabilization via mismatch detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7718244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77182442020-12-07 Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans Forcato, Cecilia Klinzing, Jens G. Carbone, Julia Radloff, Michael Weber, Frederik D. Born, Jan Diekelmann, Susanne Commun Biol Article Reactivation by reminder cues labilizes memories during wakefulness, requiring reconsolidation to persist. In contrast, during sleep, cued reactivation seems to directly stabilize memories. In reconsolidation, incomplete reminders are more effective in reactivating memories than complete reminders by inducing a mismatch, i.e. a discrepancy between expected and actual events. Whether mismatch is likewise detected during sleep is unclear. Here we test whether cued reactivation during sleep is more effective for mismatch-inducing incomplete than complete reminders. We first establish that only incomplete but not complete reminders labilize memories during wakefulness. When complete or incomplete reminders are presented during 40-min sleep, both reminders are equally effective in stabilizing memories. However, when extending the retention interval for another 7 hours (following 40-min sleep), only incomplete but not complete reminders stabilize memories, regardless of the extension containing wakefulness or sleep. We propose that, during sleep, only incomplete reminders initiate long-term memory stabilization via mismatch detection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7718244/ /pubmed/33277601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Forcato, Cecilia Klinzing, Jens G. Carbone, Julia Radloff, Michael Weber, Frederik D. Born, Jan Diekelmann, Susanne Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title | Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title_full | Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title_fullStr | Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title_short | Reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
title_sort | reactivation during sleep with incomplete reminder cues rather than complete ones stabilizes long-term memory in humans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01457-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forcatocecilia reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT klinzingjensg reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT carbonejulia reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT radloffmichael reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT weberfrederikd reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT bornjan reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans AT diekelmannsusanne reactivationduringsleepwithincompleteremindercuesratherthancompleteonesstabilizeslongtermmemoryinhumans |