Cargando…

Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE: The Gamma Knife (GK) Icon allows for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery using a thermoplastic mask in combination with intrafraction motion monitoring using high definition motion management. The system pauses treatment if the magnitude of motion in all directions exceeds 1 to 1.5 mm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegner, Rodney E., Xu, Linda, Horne, Zachary, Yu, Alexander, Goss, Matthew, Liang, Yun, Sohn, Jason, Karlovits, Stephen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.025
_version_ 1783619505001332736
author Wegner, Rodney E.
Xu, Linda
Horne, Zachary
Yu, Alexander
Goss, Matthew
Liang, Yun
Sohn, Jason
Karlovits, Stephen M.
author_facet Wegner, Rodney E.
Xu, Linda
Horne, Zachary
Yu, Alexander
Goss, Matthew
Liang, Yun
Sohn, Jason
Karlovits, Stephen M.
author_sort Wegner, Rodney E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Gamma Knife (GK) Icon allows for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery using a thermoplastic mask in combination with intrafraction motion monitoring using high definition motion management. The system pauses treatment if the magnitude of motion in all directions exceeds 1 to 1.5 mm, causing a break in treatment and prolongation of the session. We reviewed the records of patients treated in a frameless manner on our GK Icon system to determine predictors for treatment interruption. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of patients treated between May 2019 and May 2020 on the GK Icon using a frameless technique for brain metastases, gliomas, schwannomas, and meningiomas. We recorded treatment time as noted in the plan document, actual treatment delivery time, and any pauses in treatment. We tabulated baseline characteristics including age, gender, diagnosis, performance status, and shifts at time of treatment. We used a receiver operating curve analysis to determine a timepoint corresponding with treatment interruption. We then conducted a logistic regression analysis to generate odds ratios for likelihood of treatment. RESULTS: We identified 150 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The majority (82%) were patients with brain metastases. The median age was 63 and the median dose was 27 Gy (16-30 Gy) in 3 fractions (1-5 fractions). The median treatment time was 23 minutes (4-108 minutes). Sixty-nine patients (46%) had at least 1 pause in treatment (range, 1-7). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed treatment time >19 minutes and rotation >0.47 degrees to be associated with interruption. Multivariable logistic regression revealed rotation >0.47 degrees and treatment time >19 minutes as predictive of interruption. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with rotations exceeding 0.47 degrees or an extended treatment time, physicians should expect treatment interruptions, consider fractionation to lessen table time, or use a frame-based approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77184962020-12-09 Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery Wegner, Rodney E. Xu, Linda Horne, Zachary Yu, Alexander Goss, Matthew Liang, Yun Sohn, Jason Karlovits, Stephen M. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The Gamma Knife (GK) Icon allows for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery using a thermoplastic mask in combination with intrafraction motion monitoring using high definition motion management. The system pauses treatment if the magnitude of motion in all directions exceeds 1 to 1.5 mm, causing a break in treatment and prolongation of the session. We reviewed the records of patients treated in a frameless manner on our GK Icon system to determine predictors for treatment interruption. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of patients treated between May 2019 and May 2020 on the GK Icon using a frameless technique for brain metastases, gliomas, schwannomas, and meningiomas. We recorded treatment time as noted in the plan document, actual treatment delivery time, and any pauses in treatment. We tabulated baseline characteristics including age, gender, diagnosis, performance status, and shifts at time of treatment. We used a receiver operating curve analysis to determine a timepoint corresponding with treatment interruption. We then conducted a logistic regression analysis to generate odds ratios for likelihood of treatment. RESULTS: We identified 150 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The majority (82%) were patients with brain metastases. The median age was 63 and the median dose was 27 Gy (16-30 Gy) in 3 fractions (1-5 fractions). The median treatment time was 23 minutes (4-108 minutes). Sixty-nine patients (46%) had at least 1 pause in treatment (range, 1-7). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed treatment time >19 minutes and rotation >0.47 degrees to be associated with interruption. Multivariable logistic regression revealed rotation >0.47 degrees and treatment time >19 minutes as predictive of interruption. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with rotations exceeding 0.47 degrees or an extended treatment time, physicians should expect treatment interruptions, consider fractionation to lessen table time, or use a frame-based approach. Elsevier 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7718496/ /pubmed/33305076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.025 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Wegner, Rodney E.
Xu, Linda
Horne, Zachary
Yu, Alexander
Goss, Matthew
Liang, Yun
Sohn, Jason
Karlovits, Stephen M.
Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title_full Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title_fullStr Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title_short Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery
title_sort predictors of treatment interruption during frameless gamma knife icon stereotactic radiosurgery
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.025
work_keys_str_mv AT wegnerrodneye predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT xulinda predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT hornezachary predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT yualexander predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT gossmatthew predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT liangyun predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT sohnjason predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery
AT karlovitsstephenm predictorsoftreatmentinterruptionduringframelessgammaknifeiconstereotacticradiosurgery