Cargando…

Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered with deep-inspiration breath hold (IMRT-BH) provides favorable normal tissue dosimetric profiles when treating patients with mediastinal lymphoma. However, it is unclear if IMRT-BH plans are comparable to free breathing (FB) proton plans. We p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreno, Amy C., Gunther, Jillian R., Milgrom, Sarah, Fuller, C. David, Williamson, Tyler, Liu, Amy, Wu, Richard, Zhu, X. Ronald, Dabaja, Bouthaina S., Pinnix, Chelsea C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.004
_version_ 1783619510179201024
author Moreno, Amy C.
Gunther, Jillian R.
Milgrom, Sarah
Fuller, C. David
Williamson, Tyler
Liu, Amy
Wu, Richard
Zhu, X. Ronald
Dabaja, Bouthaina S.
Pinnix, Chelsea C.
author_facet Moreno, Amy C.
Gunther, Jillian R.
Milgrom, Sarah
Fuller, C. David
Williamson, Tyler
Liu, Amy
Wu, Richard
Zhu, X. Ronald
Dabaja, Bouthaina S.
Pinnix, Chelsea C.
author_sort Moreno, Amy C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered with deep-inspiration breath hold (IMRT-BH) provides favorable normal tissue dosimetric profiles when treating patients with mediastinal lymphoma. However, it is unclear if IMRT-BH plans are comparable to free breathing (FB) proton plans. We performed a retrospective, comparative dosimetric study between IMRT-BH and FB passive scatter proton therapy (P-FB) or intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT-FB). Hypothesizing that BH would provide superior normal tissue sparing when added to proton therapy, we also compared plans to passive scatter BH (P-BH). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 15 patients who received involved-site RT with “butterfly” IMRT-BH, 3 additional proton plans (P-FB, IMPT-FB, P-BH) were optimized to deliver 30.6 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness. Dosimetric variables (mean dose, V30, V25, V15, and V5) for organs at risk (OARs) were calculated and compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 57 studied OAR parameters, IMRT-BH plans were comparable in 37 (65%) parameters with P-FB plans, 32 (56%) of IMPT-FB parameters, and 30 (53%) of P-BH parameters. Doses to breasts were generally equivalent among plans while esophageal dosing was worse with IMRT-BH. Mean doses and V5 of the total lung and heart were the highest with IMRT-BH; however, IMRT-BH resulted in comparable coronary and superior lung V30 relative to proton plans. The addition of BH with proton therapy resulted in the greatest lung sparing, with mean lung dose reductions of 11% to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BH with IMRT reduces the disparity in OAR doses with equivalence achieved in nearly two-thirds of OAR metrics compared with P-FB and 50% compared with IMPT-BH. Because each modality exhibited unique benefits, personalization of modality selection is recommended. Proton therapy via BH provides additional benefits in heart and lung sparing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77185272020-12-09 Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma Moreno, Amy C. Gunther, Jillian R. Milgrom, Sarah Fuller, C. David Williamson, Tyler Liu, Amy Wu, Richard Zhu, X. Ronald Dabaja, Bouthaina S. Pinnix, Chelsea C. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered with deep-inspiration breath hold (IMRT-BH) provides favorable normal tissue dosimetric profiles when treating patients with mediastinal lymphoma. However, it is unclear if IMRT-BH plans are comparable to free breathing (FB) proton plans. We performed a retrospective, comparative dosimetric study between IMRT-BH and FB passive scatter proton therapy (P-FB) or intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT-FB). Hypothesizing that BH would provide superior normal tissue sparing when added to proton therapy, we also compared plans to passive scatter BH (P-BH). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 15 patients who received involved-site RT with “butterfly” IMRT-BH, 3 additional proton plans (P-FB, IMPT-FB, P-BH) were optimized to deliver 30.6 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness. Dosimetric variables (mean dose, V30, V25, V15, and V5) for organs at risk (OARs) were calculated and compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 57 studied OAR parameters, IMRT-BH plans were comparable in 37 (65%) parameters with P-FB plans, 32 (56%) of IMPT-FB parameters, and 30 (53%) of P-BH parameters. Doses to breasts were generally equivalent among plans while esophageal dosing was worse with IMRT-BH. Mean doses and V5 of the total lung and heart were the highest with IMRT-BH; however, IMRT-BH resulted in comparable coronary and superior lung V30 relative to proton plans. The addition of BH with proton therapy resulted in the greatest lung sparing, with mean lung dose reductions of 11% to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BH with IMRT reduces the disparity in OAR doses with equivalence achieved in nearly two-thirds of OAR metrics compared with P-FB and 50% compared with IMPT-BH. Because each modality exhibited unique benefits, personalization of modality selection is recommended. Proton therapy via BH provides additional benefits in heart and lung sparing. Elsevier 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7718527/ /pubmed/33305086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Moreno, Amy C.
Gunther, Jillian R.
Milgrom, Sarah
Fuller, C. David
Williamson, Tyler
Liu, Amy
Wu, Richard
Zhu, X. Ronald
Dabaja, Bouthaina S.
Pinnix, Chelsea C.
Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title_full Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title_fullStr Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title_short Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma
title_sort effect of deep inspiration breath hold on normal tissue sparing with intensity modulated radiation therapy versus proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT morenoamyc effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT guntherjillianr effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT milgromsarah effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT fullercdavid effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT williamsontyler effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT liuamy effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT wurichard effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT zhuxronald effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT dabajabouthainas effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma
AT pinnixchelseac effectofdeepinspirationbreathholdonnormaltissuesparingwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusprotontherapyformediastinallymphoma