Cargando…

ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study

BACKGROUND: The so called ABCDE approach (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) is a golden standard of patient assessment. The efficacy of using cognitive aids (CA) in resuscitation and peri-arrest situations remains an important knowledge gap. This work aims to develop an ABCDE CA tool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peran, David, Kodet, Jiri, Pekara, Jaroslav, Mala, Lucie, Truhlar, Anatolij, Cmorej, Patrik Christian, Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup, Sari, Ferenc, Sykora, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3
_version_ 1783619539770015744
author Peran, David
Kodet, Jiri
Pekara, Jaroslav
Mala, Lucie
Truhlar, Anatolij
Cmorej, Patrik Christian
Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup
Sari, Ferenc
Sykora, Roman
author_facet Peran, David
Kodet, Jiri
Pekara, Jaroslav
Mala, Lucie
Truhlar, Anatolij
Cmorej, Patrik Christian
Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup
Sari, Ferenc
Sykora, Roman
author_sort Peran, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The so called ABCDE approach (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) is a golden standard of patient assessment. The efficacy of using cognitive aids (CA) in resuscitation and peri-arrest situations remains an important knowledge gap. This work aims to develop an ABCDE CA tool (CAT) and study its potential benefits in patient condition assessment. METHODS: The development of the ABCDE CAT was done by 3 rounds of modified Delphi method performed by the members of the Advanced Life Support Science and Education Committee of the European Resuscitation Council. A pilot multicentre study on 48 paramedic students performing patient assessment in pre-post cohorts (without and with the ABCDA CAT) was made in order to validate and evaluate the impact of the tool in simulated clinical scenarios. The cumulative number and proper order of steps in clinical assessment in simulated scenarios were recorded and the time of the assessment was measured. RESULTS: The Delphi method resulted in the ABCDE CAT. The use of ABCDE CAT was associated with more performed assessment steps (804: 868; OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.35, p = 0.023) which were significantly more frequently performed in proper order (220: 338; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.02, p < 0.0001). The use of ABCDE CAT did not prolong the time of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: The cognitive aid for ABCDE assessment was developed. The use of this cognitive aid for ABCDE helps paramedics to perform more procedures, more frequently in the right order and did not prolong the patient assessment in advanced life support and peri-arrest care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77186862020-12-07 ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study Peran, David Kodet, Jiri Pekara, Jaroslav Mala, Lucie Truhlar, Anatolij Cmorej, Patrik Christian Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup Sari, Ferenc Sykora, Roman BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The so called ABCDE approach (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) is a golden standard of patient assessment. The efficacy of using cognitive aids (CA) in resuscitation and peri-arrest situations remains an important knowledge gap. This work aims to develop an ABCDE CA tool (CAT) and study its potential benefits in patient condition assessment. METHODS: The development of the ABCDE CAT was done by 3 rounds of modified Delphi method performed by the members of the Advanced Life Support Science and Education Committee of the European Resuscitation Council. A pilot multicentre study on 48 paramedic students performing patient assessment in pre-post cohorts (without and with the ABCDA CAT) was made in order to validate and evaluate the impact of the tool in simulated clinical scenarios. The cumulative number and proper order of steps in clinical assessment in simulated scenarios were recorded and the time of the assessment was measured. RESULTS: The Delphi method resulted in the ABCDE CAT. The use of ABCDE CAT was associated with more performed assessment steps (804: 868; OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.35, p = 0.023) which were significantly more frequently performed in proper order (220: 338; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.02, p < 0.0001). The use of ABCDE CAT did not prolong the time of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: The cognitive aid for ABCDE assessment was developed. The use of this cognitive aid for ABCDE helps paramedics to perform more procedures, more frequently in the right order and did not prolong the patient assessment in advanced life support and peri-arrest care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3. BioMed Central 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7718686/ /pubmed/33276731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peran, David
Kodet, Jiri
Pekara, Jaroslav
Mala, Lucie
Truhlar, Anatolij
Cmorej, Patrik Christian
Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup
Sari, Ferenc
Sykora, Roman
ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title_full ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title_fullStr ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title_full_unstemmed ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title_short ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
title_sort abcde cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3
work_keys_str_mv AT perandavid abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT kodetjiri abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT pekarajaroslav abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT malalucie abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT truhlaranatolij abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT cmorejpatrikchristian abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT lauridsenkasperglerup abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT sariferenc abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy
AT sykoraroman abcdecognitiveaidtoolinpatientassessmentdevelopmentandvalidationinamulticenterpilotsimulationstudy