Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The poor translation of research findings into routine clinical practice is common in all areas of healthcare. Having a better understanding of how researchers and clinicians experience engagement in and with research, their working relationships and expectations of each other, may be on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Julie, Craig, Tom J., Robson, Debbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w
_version_ 1783619543088758784
author Williams, Julie
Craig, Tom J.
Robson, Debbie
author_facet Williams, Julie
Craig, Tom J.
Robson, Debbie
author_sort Williams, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The poor translation of research findings into routine clinical practice is common in all areas of healthcare. Having a better understanding of how researchers and clinicians experience engagement in and with research, their working relationships and expectations of each other, may be one way to help to facilitate collaborative partnerships and therefore increase successful translation of research into clinical practice. AIMS: To explore the views of clinical and research staff about their experiences of working together during research projects and identify the facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups with 18 participants - clinicians, researchers and those with a dual clinical-research role, recruited from one mental health Trust and one university. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eight themes were identified under the headings of two research questions 1) Barriers and facilitators of either engaging in or with research from the perspective of clinical staff, with themes of understanding the benefits of the research; perceived knowledge and personal qualities of researchers; lack of time and organisational support to be involved in and implement research; and lack of feedback about progress and outcome of research. 2) Barriers and facilitators for engaging with clinicians when conducting research, from the perspective of researchers, with themes of understanding what clinicians need to know and how they need to feel to engage with research; demonstrating an understanding of the clinician’s world; navigating through the clinical world; and demands of the researcher role. CONCLUSION: There was agreement between clinicians and researchers about the barriers and facilitators for engaging clinicians in research. Both groups identified that it was the researcher’s responsibility to form and maintain good working relationships. Better support for researchers in their role calls for training in communication skills and bespoke training to understand the local context in which research is taking place. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77187012020-12-07 Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study Williams, Julie Craig, Tom J. Robson, Debbie BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The poor translation of research findings into routine clinical practice is common in all areas of healthcare. Having a better understanding of how researchers and clinicians experience engagement in and with research, their working relationships and expectations of each other, may be one way to help to facilitate collaborative partnerships and therefore increase successful translation of research into clinical practice. AIMS: To explore the views of clinical and research staff about their experiences of working together during research projects and identify the facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups with 18 participants - clinicians, researchers and those with a dual clinical-research role, recruited from one mental health Trust and one university. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eight themes were identified under the headings of two research questions 1) Barriers and facilitators of either engaging in or with research from the perspective of clinical staff, with themes of understanding the benefits of the research; perceived knowledge and personal qualities of researchers; lack of time and organisational support to be involved in and implement research; and lack of feedback about progress and outcome of research. 2) Barriers and facilitators for engaging with clinicians when conducting research, from the perspective of researchers, with themes of understanding what clinicians need to know and how they need to feel to engage with research; demonstrating an understanding of the clinician’s world; navigating through the clinical world; and demands of the researcher role. CONCLUSION: There was agreement between clinicians and researchers about the barriers and facilitators for engaging clinicians in research. Both groups identified that it was the researcher’s responsibility to form and maintain good working relationships. Better support for researchers in their role calls for training in communication skills and bespoke training to understand the local context in which research is taking place. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w. BioMed Central 2020-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7718701/ /pubmed/33278896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Williams, Julie
Craig, Tom J.
Robson, Debbie
Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title_full Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title_short Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
title_sort barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsjulie barriersandfacilitatorsofclinicianandresearchercollaborationsaqualitativestudy
AT craigtomj barriersandfacilitatorsofclinicianandresearchercollaborationsaqualitativestudy
AT robsondebbie barriersandfacilitatorsofclinicianandresearchercollaborationsaqualitativestudy