Cargando…
The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293871 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631 |
_version_ | 1783619574461104128 |
---|---|
author | Kuvås, Karen Rosmo Saltvedt, Ingvild Aam, Stina Thingstad, Pernille Ellekjær, Hanne Askim, Torunn |
author_facet | Kuvås, Karen Rosmo Saltvedt, Ingvild Aam, Stina Thingstad, Pernille Ellekjær, Hanne Askim, Torunn |
author_sort | Kuvås, Karen Rosmo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics from participants with non-participants in Nor-COAST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nor-COAST is a prospective cohort multi-center study, recruiting participants from five Norwegian hospitals. Patients with the diagnosis of acute stroke were screened for inclusion. Baseline data from the participants recruited between May 2015 and March 2017 were compared to corresponding data from those not participating in Nor-COAST but registered in the Norwegian Stroke Registry. Regression analysis was used to assess whether age, stroke severity, sex and stroke subtype were independently associated with inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Out of 2505 available patients, 815 (32.5%) were included in Nor-COAST. There were no differences between participants and non-participants with respect to age (mean (SD) age 73.5 (11.7) versus 74.2 (14.5) years) or sex (44.8% versus 46.9% women). A significantly larger proportion of the participants were independent prior to stroke (87% versus 78%), had mild strokes (69% versus 55%) and suffered from cerebral infarction (90% versus 84%). The regression analysis showed decreased odds ratio (OR) of being included for those with higher degree of pre-stroke dependency (OR 0.895, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.971, p=0.007) and a more severe stroke (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.939 to 0.966, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The participants in Nor-COAST had a better pre-stroke health condition and milder strokes compared to non-participants. However, the participants should be regarded as representative of the majority of the stroke population which suffers from mild strokes. Nevertheless, baseline information for non-participants should be available also in future clinical studies to make it easier to identify which part of the stroke population the results can be generalized to. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7718873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77188732020-12-07 The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study Kuvås, Karen Rosmo Saltvedt, Ingvild Aam, Stina Thingstad, Pernille Ellekjær, Hanne Askim, Torunn Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics from participants with non-participants in Nor-COAST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nor-COAST is a prospective cohort multi-center study, recruiting participants from five Norwegian hospitals. Patients with the diagnosis of acute stroke were screened for inclusion. Baseline data from the participants recruited between May 2015 and March 2017 were compared to corresponding data from those not participating in Nor-COAST but registered in the Norwegian Stroke Registry. Regression analysis was used to assess whether age, stroke severity, sex and stroke subtype were independently associated with inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Out of 2505 available patients, 815 (32.5%) were included in Nor-COAST. There were no differences between participants and non-participants with respect to age (mean (SD) age 73.5 (11.7) versus 74.2 (14.5) years) or sex (44.8% versus 46.9% women). A significantly larger proportion of the participants were independent prior to stroke (87% versus 78%), had mild strokes (69% versus 55%) and suffered from cerebral infarction (90% versus 84%). The regression analysis showed decreased odds ratio (OR) of being included for those with higher degree of pre-stroke dependency (OR 0.895, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.971, p=0.007) and a more severe stroke (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.939 to 0.966, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The participants in Nor-COAST had a better pre-stroke health condition and milder strokes compared to non-participants. However, the participants should be regarded as representative of the majority of the stroke population which suffers from mild strokes. Nevertheless, baseline information for non-participants should be available also in future clinical studies to make it easier to identify which part of the stroke population the results can be generalized to. Dove 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7718873/ /pubmed/33293871 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631 Text en © 2020 Kuvås et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kuvås, Karen Rosmo Saltvedt, Ingvild Aam, Stina Thingstad, Pernille Ellekjær, Hanne Askim, Torunn The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title | The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title_full | The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title_fullStr | The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title_short | The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study |
title_sort | risk of selection bias in a clinical multi-center cohort study. results from the norwegian cognitive impairment after stroke (nor-coast) study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293871 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuvaskarenrosmo theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT saltvedtingvild theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT aamstina theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT thingstadpernille theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT ellekjærhanne theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT askimtorunn theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT kuvaskarenrosmo riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT saltvedtingvild riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT aamstina riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT thingstadpernille riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT ellekjærhanne riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy AT askimtorunn riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy |