Cargando…

The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study

PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuvås, Karen Rosmo, Saltvedt, Ingvild, Aam, Stina, Thingstad, Pernille, Ellekjær, Hanne, Askim, Torunn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293871
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631
_version_ 1783619574461104128
author Kuvås, Karen Rosmo
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Aam, Stina
Thingstad, Pernille
Ellekjær, Hanne
Askim, Torunn
author_facet Kuvås, Karen Rosmo
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Aam, Stina
Thingstad, Pernille
Ellekjær, Hanne
Askim, Torunn
author_sort Kuvås, Karen Rosmo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics from participants with non-participants in Nor-COAST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nor-COAST is a prospective cohort multi-center study, recruiting participants from five Norwegian hospitals. Patients with the diagnosis of acute stroke were screened for inclusion. Baseline data from the participants recruited between May 2015 and March 2017 were compared to corresponding data from those not participating in Nor-COAST but registered in the Norwegian Stroke Registry. Regression analysis was used to assess whether age, stroke severity, sex and stroke subtype were independently associated with inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Out of 2505 available patients, 815 (32.5%) were included in Nor-COAST. There were no differences between participants and non-participants with respect to age (mean (SD) age 73.5 (11.7) versus 74.2 (14.5) years) or sex (44.8% versus 46.9% women). A significantly larger proportion of the participants were independent prior to stroke (87% versus 78%), had mild strokes (69% versus 55%) and suffered from cerebral infarction (90% versus 84%). The regression analysis showed decreased odds ratio (OR) of being included for those with higher degree of pre-stroke dependency (OR 0.895, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.971, p=0.007) and a more severe stroke (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.939 to 0.966, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The participants in Nor-COAST had a better pre-stroke health condition and milder strokes compared to non-participants. However, the participants should be regarded as representative of the majority of the stroke population which suffers from mild strokes. Nevertheless, baseline information for non-participants should be available also in future clinical studies to make it easier to identify which part of the stroke population the results can be generalized to.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7718873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77188732020-12-07 The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study Kuvås, Karen Rosmo Saltvedt, Ingvild Aam, Stina Thingstad, Pernille Ellekjær, Hanne Askim, Torunn Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: The Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive disorder in an unselected stroke cohort. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selection bias occurred by comparing baseline characteristics from participants with non-participants in Nor-COAST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nor-COAST is a prospective cohort multi-center study, recruiting participants from five Norwegian hospitals. Patients with the diagnosis of acute stroke were screened for inclusion. Baseline data from the participants recruited between May 2015 and March 2017 were compared to corresponding data from those not participating in Nor-COAST but registered in the Norwegian Stroke Registry. Regression analysis was used to assess whether age, stroke severity, sex and stroke subtype were independently associated with inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Out of 2505 available patients, 815 (32.5%) were included in Nor-COAST. There were no differences between participants and non-participants with respect to age (mean (SD) age 73.5 (11.7) versus 74.2 (14.5) years) or sex (44.8% versus 46.9% women). A significantly larger proportion of the participants were independent prior to stroke (87% versus 78%), had mild strokes (69% versus 55%) and suffered from cerebral infarction (90% versus 84%). The regression analysis showed decreased odds ratio (OR) of being included for those with higher degree of pre-stroke dependency (OR 0.895, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.971, p=0.007) and a more severe stroke (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.939 to 0.966, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The participants in Nor-COAST had a better pre-stroke health condition and milder strokes compared to non-participants. However, the participants should be regarded as representative of the majority of the stroke population which suffers from mild strokes. Nevertheless, baseline information for non-participants should be available also in future clinical studies to make it easier to identify which part of the stroke population the results can be generalized to. Dove 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7718873/ /pubmed/33293871 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631 Text en © 2020 Kuvås et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kuvås, Karen Rosmo
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Aam, Stina
Thingstad, Pernille
Ellekjær, Hanne
Askim, Torunn
The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title_full The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title_fullStr The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title_full_unstemmed The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title_short The Risk of Selection Bias in a Clinical Multi-Center Cohort Study. Results from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) Study
title_sort risk of selection bias in a clinical multi-center cohort study. results from the norwegian cognitive impairment after stroke (nor-coast) study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293871
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S276631
work_keys_str_mv AT kuvaskarenrosmo theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT saltvedtingvild theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT aamstina theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT thingstadpernille theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT ellekjærhanne theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT askimtorunn theriskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT kuvaskarenrosmo riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT saltvedtingvild riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT aamstina riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT thingstadpernille riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT ellekjærhanne riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy
AT askimtorunn riskofselectionbiasinaclinicalmulticentercohortstudyresultsfromthenorwegiancognitiveimpairmentafterstrokenorcoaststudy