Cargando…

Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China

BACKGROUND: Vaccinations are an effective choice to stop disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. There is little research on individuals' COVID-19 vaccination decision-making. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccinations in China, and to assess the factors in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leng, Anli, Maitland, Elizabeth, Wang, Siyuan, Nicholas, Stephen, Liu, Rugang, Wang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009
_version_ 1783619603357761536
author Leng, Anli
Maitland, Elizabeth
Wang, Siyuan
Nicholas, Stephen
Liu, Rugang
Wang, Jian
author_facet Leng, Anli
Maitland, Elizabeth
Wang, Siyuan
Nicholas, Stephen
Liu, Rugang
Wang, Jian
author_sort Leng, Anli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccinations are an effective choice to stop disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. There is little research on individuals' COVID-19 vaccination decision-making. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccinations in China, and to assess the factors influencing vaccination decision-making to facilitate vaccination coverage. METHODS: A D-efficient discrete choice experiment was conducted across six Chinese provinces selected by the stratified random sampling method. Vaccine choice sets were constructed using seven attributes: vaccine effectiveness, side-effects, accessibility, number of doses, vaccination sites, duration of vaccine protection, and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Conditional logit and latent class models were used to identify preferences. RESULTS: Although all seven attributes were proved to significantly influence respondents’ vaccination decision, vaccine effectiveness, side-effects and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated were the most important. We also found a higher probability of vaccinating when the vaccine was more effective; risks of serious side effects were small; vaccinations were free and voluntary; the fewer the number of doses; the longer the protection duration; and the higher the proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Higher local vaccine coverage created altruistic herd incentives to vaccinate rather than free-rider problems. The predicted vaccination uptake of the optimal vaccination scenario in our study was 84.77%. Preference heterogeneity was substantial. Individuals who were older, had a lower education level, lower income, higher trust in the vaccine and higher perceived risk of infection, displayed a higher probability to vaccinate. CONCLUSIONS: Preference heterogeneity among individuals should lead health authorities to address the diversity of expectations about COVID-19 vaccinations. To maximize COVID-19 vaccine uptake, health authorities should promote vaccine effectiveness; pro-actively communicate the absence or presence of vaccine side effects; and ensure rapid and wide media communication about local vaccine coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77190012020-12-07 Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China Leng, Anli Maitland, Elizabeth Wang, Siyuan Nicholas, Stephen Liu, Rugang Wang, Jian Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Vaccinations are an effective choice to stop disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. There is little research on individuals' COVID-19 vaccination decision-making. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccinations in China, and to assess the factors influencing vaccination decision-making to facilitate vaccination coverage. METHODS: A D-efficient discrete choice experiment was conducted across six Chinese provinces selected by the stratified random sampling method. Vaccine choice sets were constructed using seven attributes: vaccine effectiveness, side-effects, accessibility, number of doses, vaccination sites, duration of vaccine protection, and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Conditional logit and latent class models were used to identify preferences. RESULTS: Although all seven attributes were proved to significantly influence respondents’ vaccination decision, vaccine effectiveness, side-effects and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated were the most important. We also found a higher probability of vaccinating when the vaccine was more effective; risks of serious side effects were small; vaccinations were free and voluntary; the fewer the number of doses; the longer the protection duration; and the higher the proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Higher local vaccine coverage created altruistic herd incentives to vaccinate rather than free-rider problems. The predicted vaccination uptake of the optimal vaccination scenario in our study was 84.77%. Preference heterogeneity was substantial. Individuals who were older, had a lower education level, lower income, higher trust in the vaccine and higher perceived risk of infection, displayed a higher probability to vaccinate. CONCLUSIONS: Preference heterogeneity among individuals should lead health authorities to address the diversity of expectations about COVID-19 vaccinations. To maximize COVID-19 vaccine uptake, health authorities should promote vaccine effectiveness; pro-actively communicate the absence or presence of vaccine side effects; and ensure rapid and wide media communication about local vaccine coverage. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01-08 2020-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7719001/ /pubmed/33328140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Leng, Anli
Maitland, Elizabeth
Wang, Siyuan
Nicholas, Stephen
Liu, Rugang
Wang, Jian
Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title_full Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title_fullStr Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title_full_unstemmed Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title_short Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China
title_sort individual preferences for covid-19 vaccination in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009
work_keys_str_mv AT lenganli individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina
AT maitlandelizabeth individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina
AT wangsiyuan individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina
AT nicholasstephen individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina
AT liurugang individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina
AT wangjian individualpreferencesforcovid19vaccinationinchina