Cargando…

Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattanavipapong, Waranya, Kapoor, Ritika, Teerawattananon, Yot, Luttjeboer, Jos, Botwright, Siobhan, Archer, Rachel A., Giersing, Birgitte, Hutubessy, Raymond C. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610741
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01
_version_ 1783619633994006528
author Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Kapoor, Ritika
Teerawattananon, Yot
Luttjeboer, Jos
Botwright, Siobhan
Archer, Rachel A.
Giersing, Birgitte
Hutubessy, Raymond C. W.
author_facet Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Kapoor, Ritika
Teerawattananon, Yot
Luttjeboer, Jos
Botwright, Siobhan
Archer, Rachel A.
Giersing, Birgitte
Hutubessy, Raymond C. W.
author_sort Rattanavipapong, Waranya
collection PubMed
description Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77192142020-12-09 Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand Rattanavipapong, Waranya Kapoor, Ritika Teerawattananon, Yot Luttjeboer, Jos Botwright, Siobhan Archer, Rachel A. Giersing, Birgitte Hutubessy, Raymond C. W. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7719214/ /pubmed/32610741 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01 Text en © 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Kapoor, Ritika
Teerawattananon, Yot
Luttjeboer, Jos
Botwright, Siobhan
Archer, Rachel A.
Giersing, Birgitte
Hutubessy, Raymond C. W.
Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title_full Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title_fullStr Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title_short Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
title_sort comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in thailand
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610741
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01
work_keys_str_mv AT rattanavipapongwaranya comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT kapoorritika comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT teerawattananonyot comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT luttjeboerjos comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT botwrightsiobhan comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT archerrachela comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT giersingbirgitte comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand
AT hutubessyraymondcw comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand