Cargando…
Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610741 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01 |
_version_ | 1783619633994006528 |
---|---|
author | Rattanavipapong, Waranya Kapoor, Ritika Teerawattananon, Yot Luttjeboer, Jos Botwright, Siobhan Archer, Rachel A. Giersing, Birgitte Hutubessy, Raymond C. W. |
author_facet | Rattanavipapong, Waranya Kapoor, Ritika Teerawattananon, Yot Luttjeboer, Jos Botwright, Siobhan Archer, Rachel A. Giersing, Birgitte Hutubessy, Raymond C. W. |
author_sort | Rattanavipapong, Waranya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7719214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77192142020-12-09 Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand Rattanavipapong, Waranya Kapoor, Ritika Teerawattananon, Yot Luttjeboer, Jos Botwright, Siobhan Archer, Rachel A. Giersing, Birgitte Hutubessy, Raymond C. W. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7719214/ /pubmed/32610741 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01 Text en © 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rattanavipapong, Waranya Kapoor, Ritika Teerawattananon, Yot Luttjeboer, Jos Botwright, Siobhan Archer, Rachel A. Giersing, Birgitte Hutubessy, Raymond C. W. Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title | Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title_full | Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title_fullStr | Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title_short | Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand |
title_sort | comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in thailand |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610741 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattanavipapongwaranya comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT kapoorritika comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT teerawattananonyot comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT luttjeboerjos comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT botwrightsiobhan comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT archerrachela comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT giersingbirgitte comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand AT hutubessyraymondcw comparing3approachesformakingvaccineadoptiondecisionsinthailand |