Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG perform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229800 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196 |
_version_ | 1783619676561997824 |
---|---|
author | Pih, Gyu Young Na, Hee Kyong Hong, Suk-Kyung Ahn, Ji Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Jung, Kee Wook Kim, Do Hoon Choi, Kee Don Song, Ho June Lee, Gin Hyug Jung, Hwoon-Yong |
author_facet | Pih, Gyu Young Na, Hee Kyong Hong, Suk-Kyung Ahn, Ji Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Jung, Kee Wook Kim, Do Hoon Choi, Kee Don Song, Ho June Lee, Gin Hyug Jung, Hwoon-Yong |
author_sort | Pih, Gyu Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG performed in the GW. METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients in the SICU and 263 in the GW, who underwent PEG between January 2013 and July 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median age of the 27 SICU patients was 66 years, and their median body mass index was 21.1 kg/m(2). In the SICU group, the median baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 4, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 16. The median interval between surgery and PEG in SICU patients was 30 days, with a PEG failure rate of 3.7%. Acute complications in SICU patients included bleeding (7.4%) and ileus (11.1%), while chronic complications included aspiration pneumonia (7.4%) and tube obstruction (3.7%). The rates of acute and chronic complications did not differ significantly between the SICU and GW groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.8% in SICU patients and 5.3% in GW patients (p=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is a safe and feasible method of enteral feeding for critically ill patients who require ICU care after surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7719425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77194252020-12-09 Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit Pih, Gyu Young Na, Hee Kyong Hong, Suk-Kyung Ahn, Ji Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Jung, Kee Wook Kim, Do Hoon Choi, Kee Don Song, Ho June Lee, Gin Hyug Jung, Hwoon-Yong Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG performed in the GW. METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients in the SICU and 263 in the GW, who underwent PEG between January 2013 and July 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median age of the 27 SICU patients was 66 years, and their median body mass index was 21.1 kg/m(2). In the SICU group, the median baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 4, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 16. The median interval between surgery and PEG in SICU patients was 30 days, with a PEG failure rate of 3.7%. Acute complications in SICU patients included bleeding (7.4%) and ileus (11.1%), while chronic complications included aspiration pneumonia (7.4%) and tube obstruction (3.7%). The rates of acute and chronic complications did not differ significantly between the SICU and GW groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.8% in SICU patients and 5.3% in GW patients (p=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is a safe and feasible method of enteral feeding for critically ill patients who require ICU care after surgery. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020-11 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7719425/ /pubmed/32229800 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196 Text en Copyright © 2020 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pih, Gyu Young Na, Hee Kyong Hong, Suk-Kyung Ahn, Ji Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Jung, Kee Wook Kim, Do Hoon Choi, Kee Don Song, Ho June Lee, Gin Hyug Jung, Hwoon-Yong Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the surgical intensive care unit |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229800 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pihgyuyoung clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT naheekyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT hongsukkyung clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT ahnjiyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT leejeonghoon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT jungkeewook clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT kimdohoon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT choikeedon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT songhojune clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT leeginhyug clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit AT junghwoonyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit |