Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pih, Gyu Young, Na, Hee Kyong, Hong, Suk-Kyung, Ahn, Ji Yong, Lee, Jeong Hoon, Jung, Kee Wook, Kim, Do Hoon, Choi, Kee Don, Song, Ho June, Lee, Gin Hyug, Jung, Hwoon-Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229800
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196
_version_ 1783619676561997824
author Pih, Gyu Young
Na, Hee Kyong
Hong, Suk-Kyung
Ahn, Ji Yong
Lee, Jeong Hoon
Jung, Kee Wook
Kim, Do Hoon
Choi, Kee Don
Song, Ho June
Lee, Gin Hyug
Jung, Hwoon-Yong
author_facet Pih, Gyu Young
Na, Hee Kyong
Hong, Suk-Kyung
Ahn, Ji Yong
Lee, Jeong Hoon
Jung, Kee Wook
Kim, Do Hoon
Choi, Kee Don
Song, Ho June
Lee, Gin Hyug
Jung, Hwoon-Yong
author_sort Pih, Gyu Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG performed in the GW. METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients in the SICU and 263 in the GW, who underwent PEG between January 2013 and July 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median age of the 27 SICU patients was 66 years, and their median body mass index was 21.1 kg/m(2). In the SICU group, the median baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 4, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 16. The median interval between surgery and PEG in SICU patients was 30 days, with a PEG failure rate of 3.7%. Acute complications in SICU patients included bleeding (7.4%) and ileus (11.1%), while chronic complications included aspiration pneumonia (7.4%) and tube obstruction (3.7%). The rates of acute and chronic complications did not differ significantly between the SICU and GW groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.8% in SICU patients and 5.3% in GW patients (p=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is a safe and feasible method of enteral feeding for critically ill patients who require ICU care after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77194252020-12-09 Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit Pih, Gyu Young Na, Hee Kyong Hong, Suk-Kyung Ahn, Ji Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Jung, Kee Wook Kim, Do Hoon Choi, Kee Don Song, Ho June Lee, Gin Hyug Jung, Hwoon-Yong Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is usually performed on patients with chronic underlying diseases in the general ward (GW). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PEG performed on patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared with those of PEG performed in the GW. METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients in the SICU and 263 in the GW, who underwent PEG between January 2013 and July 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median age of the 27 SICU patients was 66 years, and their median body mass index was 21.1 kg/m(2). In the SICU group, the median baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 4, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 16. The median interval between surgery and PEG in SICU patients was 30 days, with a PEG failure rate of 3.7%. Acute complications in SICU patients included bleeding (7.4%) and ileus (11.1%), while chronic complications included aspiration pneumonia (7.4%) and tube obstruction (3.7%). The rates of acute and chronic complications did not differ significantly between the SICU and GW groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 14.8% in SICU patients and 5.3% in GW patients (p=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is a safe and feasible method of enteral feeding for critically ill patients who require ICU care after surgery. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020-11 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7719425/ /pubmed/32229800 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196 Text en Copyright © 2020 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pih, Gyu Young
Na, Hee Kyong
Hong, Suk-Kyung
Ahn, Ji Yong
Lee, Jeong Hoon
Jung, Kee Wook
Kim, Do Hoon
Choi, Kee Don
Song, Ho June
Lee, Gin Hyug
Jung, Hwoon-Yong
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
title_sort clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the surgical intensive care unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229800
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.196
work_keys_str_mv AT pihgyuyoung clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT naheekyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT hongsukkyung clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT ahnjiyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT leejeonghoon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT jungkeewook clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT kimdohoon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT choikeedon clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT songhojune clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT leeginhyug clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit
AT junghwoonyong clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyinthesurgicalintensivecareunit