Cargando…

A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review

There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atri, Elias, Wong, Vivian, Barengo, Noel C, Nieder, Alan M, Polackwich, Alan S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350
_version_ 1783619695037906944
author Atri, Elias
Wong, Vivian
Barengo, Noel C
Nieder, Alan M
Polackwich, Alan S
author_facet Atri, Elias
Wong, Vivian
Barengo, Noel C
Nieder, Alan M
Polackwich, Alan S
author_sort Atri, Elias
collection PubMed
description There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim of our study was to summarize the current scientific evidence comparing the two. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. A 10-year filter was placed to include only studies published after Coloplast launched the Titan Touch® release pump. Eligibility criteria included articles discussing specifically the AMS 700(TM) and Coloplast Titan® models. Further searches for studies on patient/partner satisfaction were conducted. Abstracts were reviewed to include studies focusing specifically on the models we are studying and studies on patient satisfaction using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. The Coloplast device demonstrated slightly greater resistance to the stimulated forces of penetration and gravity. Coloplast implants coated with vancomycin/gentamicin had the highest infection rate followed by the AMS penile prosthesis and the rifampin/gentamicin coating had the lowest infection rate. Prosthesis durability and survival were similar between both brands. Overall satisfaction was high but comparisons are inconsistent. The literature is inconclusive about which device is superior. We suggest randomized, multicenter, prospective studies to help further elucidate the highlights of each product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77195052020-12-09 A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review Atri, Elias Wong, Vivian Barengo, Noel C Nieder, Alan M Polackwich, Alan S Cureus Urology There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim of our study was to summarize the current scientific evidence comparing the two. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. A 10-year filter was placed to include only studies published after Coloplast launched the Titan Touch® release pump. Eligibility criteria included articles discussing specifically the AMS 700(TM) and Coloplast Titan® models. Further searches for studies on patient/partner satisfaction were conducted. Abstracts were reviewed to include studies focusing specifically on the models we are studying and studies on patient satisfaction using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. The Coloplast device demonstrated slightly greater resistance to the stimulated forces of penetration and gravity. Coloplast implants coated with vancomycin/gentamicin had the highest infection rate followed by the AMS penile prosthesis and the rifampin/gentamicin coating had the lowest infection rate. Prosthesis durability and survival were similar between both brands. Overall satisfaction was high but comparisons are inconsistent. The literature is inconclusive about which device is superior. We suggest randomized, multicenter, prospective studies to help further elucidate the highlights of each product. Cureus 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7719505/ /pubmed/33304685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350 Text en Copyright © 2020, Atri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Atri, Elias
Wong, Vivian
Barengo, Noel C
Nieder, Alan M
Polackwich, Alan S
A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort comparison between ams 700 and coloplast titan: a systematic literature review
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350
work_keys_str_mv AT atrielias acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT wongvivian acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT barengonoelc acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT niederalanm acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT polackwichalans acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT atrielias comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT wongvivian comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT barengonoelc comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT niederalanm comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview
AT polackwichalans comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview