Cargando…
A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review
There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350 |
_version_ | 1783619695037906944 |
---|---|
author | Atri, Elias Wong, Vivian Barengo, Noel C Nieder, Alan M Polackwich, Alan S |
author_facet | Atri, Elias Wong, Vivian Barengo, Noel C Nieder, Alan M Polackwich, Alan S |
author_sort | Atri, Elias |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim of our study was to summarize the current scientific evidence comparing the two. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. A 10-year filter was placed to include only studies published after Coloplast launched the Titan Touch® release pump. Eligibility criteria included articles discussing specifically the AMS 700(TM) and Coloplast Titan® models. Further searches for studies on patient/partner satisfaction were conducted. Abstracts were reviewed to include studies focusing specifically on the models we are studying and studies on patient satisfaction using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. The Coloplast device demonstrated slightly greater resistance to the stimulated forces of penetration and gravity. Coloplast implants coated with vancomycin/gentamicin had the highest infection rate followed by the AMS penile prosthesis and the rifampin/gentamicin coating had the lowest infection rate. Prosthesis durability and survival were similar between both brands. Overall satisfaction was high but comparisons are inconsistent. The literature is inconclusive about which device is superior. We suggest randomized, multicenter, prospective studies to help further elucidate the highlights of each product. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7719505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77195052020-12-09 A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review Atri, Elias Wong, Vivian Barengo, Noel C Nieder, Alan M Polackwich, Alan S Cureus Urology There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700(TM) series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim of our study was to summarize the current scientific evidence comparing the two. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. A 10-year filter was placed to include only studies published after Coloplast launched the Titan Touch® release pump. Eligibility criteria included articles discussing specifically the AMS 700(TM) and Coloplast Titan® models. Further searches for studies on patient/partner satisfaction were conducted. Abstracts were reviewed to include studies focusing specifically on the models we are studying and studies on patient satisfaction using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. The Coloplast device demonstrated slightly greater resistance to the stimulated forces of penetration and gravity. Coloplast implants coated with vancomycin/gentamicin had the highest infection rate followed by the AMS penile prosthesis and the rifampin/gentamicin coating had the lowest infection rate. Prosthesis durability and survival were similar between both brands. Overall satisfaction was high but comparisons are inconsistent. The literature is inconclusive about which device is superior. We suggest randomized, multicenter, prospective studies to help further elucidate the highlights of each product. Cureus 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7719505/ /pubmed/33304685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350 Text en Copyright © 2020, Atri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Atri, Elias Wong, Vivian Barengo, Noel C Nieder, Alan M Polackwich, Alan S A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | A Comparison Between AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | comparison between ams 700 and coloplast titan: a systematic literature review |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atrielias acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT wongvivian acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT barengonoelc acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT niederalanm acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT polackwichalans acomparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT atrielias comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT wongvivian comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT barengonoelc comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT niederalanm comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview AT polackwichalans comparisonbetweenams700andcoloplasttitanasystematicliteraturereview |