Cargando…
How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations?
Genetic correlations between traits can strongly impact evolutionary responses to selection, and may thus impose constraints on adaptation. Theoretical and empirical work has made it clear that without strong linkage and with random mating, genetic correlations at evolutionary equilibrium result fro...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.201 |
_version_ | 1783619706149666816 |
---|---|
author | Chantepie, Stéphane Chevin, Luis‐Miguel |
author_facet | Chantepie, Stéphane Chevin, Luis‐Miguel |
author_sort | Chantepie, Stéphane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic correlations between traits can strongly impact evolutionary responses to selection, and may thus impose constraints on adaptation. Theoretical and empirical work has made it clear that without strong linkage and with random mating, genetic correlations at evolutionary equilibrium result from an interplay of correlated pleiotropic effects of mutations, and correlational selection favoring combinations of trait values. However, it is not entirely clear how change in the overall strength of stabilizing selection across traits (breadth of the fitness peak, given its shape) influences this compromise between mutation and selection effects on genetic correlation. Here, we show that the answer to this question crucially depends on the intensity of genetic drift. In large, effectively infinite populations, genetic correlations are unaffected by the strength of selection, regardless of whether the genetic architecture involves common small‐effect mutations (Gaussian regime), or rare large‐effect mutations (House‐of‐Cards regime). In contrast in finite populations, the strength of selection does affect genetic correlations, by shifting the balance from drift‐dominated to selection‐dominated evolutionary dynamics. The transition between these domains depends on mutation parameters to some extent, but with a similar dependence of genetic correlation on the strength of selection. Our results are particularly relevant for understanding how senescence shapes patterns of genetic correlations across ages, and genetic constraints on adaptation during colonization of novel habitats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7719553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77195532020-12-11 How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? Chantepie, Stéphane Chevin, Luis‐Miguel Evol Lett Letters Genetic correlations between traits can strongly impact evolutionary responses to selection, and may thus impose constraints on adaptation. Theoretical and empirical work has made it clear that without strong linkage and with random mating, genetic correlations at evolutionary equilibrium result from an interplay of correlated pleiotropic effects of mutations, and correlational selection favoring combinations of trait values. However, it is not entirely clear how change in the overall strength of stabilizing selection across traits (breadth of the fitness peak, given its shape) influences this compromise between mutation and selection effects on genetic correlation. Here, we show that the answer to this question crucially depends on the intensity of genetic drift. In large, effectively infinite populations, genetic correlations are unaffected by the strength of selection, regardless of whether the genetic architecture involves common small‐effect mutations (Gaussian regime), or rare large‐effect mutations (House‐of‐Cards regime). In contrast in finite populations, the strength of selection does affect genetic correlations, by shifting the balance from drift‐dominated to selection‐dominated evolutionary dynamics. The transition between these domains depends on mutation parameters to some extent, but with a similar dependence of genetic correlation on the strength of selection. Our results are particularly relevant for understanding how senescence shapes patterns of genetic correlations across ages, and genetic constraints on adaptation during colonization of novel habitats. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7719553/ /pubmed/33312683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.201 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters Chantepie, Stéphane Chevin, Luis‐Miguel How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title | How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title_full | How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title_fullStr | How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title_full_unstemmed | How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title_short | How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
title_sort | how does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations? |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chantepiestephane howdoesthestrengthofselectioninfluencegeneticcorrelations AT chevinluismiguel howdoesthestrengthofselectioninfluencegeneticcorrelations |