Cargando…

In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections

Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Yue, McGiffin, David, Kure, Christina, McLean, Janelle, Duncan, Courtney, Peleg, Anton Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.605608
_version_ 1783619712191561728
author Qu, Yue
McGiffin, David
Kure, Christina
McLean, Janelle
Duncan, Courtney
Peleg, Anton Y.
author_facet Qu, Yue
McGiffin, David
Kure, Christina
McLean, Janelle
Duncan, Courtney
Peleg, Anton Y.
author_sort Qu, Yue
collection PubMed
description Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of Medihoney wound gel, using in vitro models that mimic clinical biofilms grown at the driveline exit-site. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MAWG was performed for 24 clinical isolates grown under planktonic conditions, and four representative strains grown as biofilms. Different antimicrobial mechanisms of MAWG were assessed respectively for their relative contribution to its anti-biofilm activity. A colony biofilm assay and a drip-flow biofilm reactor assay mimicking the driveline exit-site environment were used to evaluate the activity of MAWG against biofilm growth at the driveline exit-site. Results: MAWG demonstrated species-specific activity against planktonic cultures [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), 5–20% weight/volume (W/V) for Staphylococcus species, 20–>40% (W/V) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species]. Higher concentrations [MICs, 30–>80% (W/V)] were able to inhibit biofilm growth, but failed to eradicate pre-established biofilms. The anti-biofilm properties of MAWG were multi-faceted, with the often-advertised “active” ingredient methylglyoxal (MGO) playing a less important role. The colony biofilm assay and the drip-flow biofilm reactor assay suggested that MAWG was unable to kill biofilms pre-established in a driveline exit-site environment, or effectively prevent planktonic cells from forming adherent monolayers and further developing mature biofilms. Conclusion: Our work suggests a suboptimal effectiveness of MAWG in preventing driveline infections due to biofilm development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77196252020-12-15 In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections Qu, Yue McGiffin, David Kure, Christina McLean, Janelle Duncan, Courtney Peleg, Anton Y. Front Microbiol Microbiology Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of Medihoney wound gel, using in vitro models that mimic clinical biofilms grown at the driveline exit-site. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MAWG was performed for 24 clinical isolates grown under planktonic conditions, and four representative strains grown as biofilms. Different antimicrobial mechanisms of MAWG were assessed respectively for their relative contribution to its anti-biofilm activity. A colony biofilm assay and a drip-flow biofilm reactor assay mimicking the driveline exit-site environment were used to evaluate the activity of MAWG against biofilm growth at the driveline exit-site. Results: MAWG demonstrated species-specific activity against planktonic cultures [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), 5–20% weight/volume (W/V) for Staphylococcus species, 20–>40% (W/V) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species]. Higher concentrations [MICs, 30–>80% (W/V)] were able to inhibit biofilm growth, but failed to eradicate pre-established biofilms. The anti-biofilm properties of MAWG were multi-faceted, with the often-advertised “active” ingredient methylglyoxal (MGO) playing a less important role. The colony biofilm assay and the drip-flow biofilm reactor assay suggested that MAWG was unable to kill biofilms pre-established in a driveline exit-site environment, or effectively prevent planktonic cells from forming adherent monolayers and further developing mature biofilms. Conclusion: Our work suggests a suboptimal effectiveness of MAWG in preventing driveline infections due to biofilm development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7719625/ /pubmed/33329497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.605608 Text en Copyright © 2020 Qu, McGiffin, Kure, McLean, Duncan and Peleg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Qu, Yue
McGiffin, David
Kure, Christina
McLean, Janelle
Duncan, Courtney
Peleg, Anton Y.
In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title_full In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title_fullStr In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title_full_unstemmed In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title_short In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
title_sort in vitro evaluation of medihoney antibacterial wound gel as an anti-biofilm agent against ventricular assist device driveline infections
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.605608
work_keys_str_mv AT quyue invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections
AT mcgiffindavid invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections
AT kurechristina invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections
AT mcleanjanelle invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections
AT duncancourtney invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections
AT pelegantony invitroevaluationofmedihoneyantibacterialwoundgelasanantibiofilmagentagainstventricularassistdevicedrivelineinfections