Cargando…

In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat, HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal, BAYAT, Mansour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346221
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701
_version_ 1783619717860163584
author MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat
HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal
BAYAT, Mansour
author_facet MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat
HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal
BAYAT, Mansour
author_sort MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducted in the Laboratory of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2018) evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of nano fluconazole compared to conventional fluconazole on dermatophyte isolates using CLSI M38-A2guidelines. Dermatophyte species isolated from clinical cases of dermatophytosis were identified using PCR sequencing techniques. Zeta potential and size of the nano particles containing fluconazole were measured; scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine nano particle structure. RESULTS: The size of liposomal fluconazole obtained was 88.9 ± 12.14 nm with –20.12 ± 3.8 mV for zeta potential. The encapsulation rate for fluconazole was 75.1± 4.2%. MIC(50) for the three tested species was 32, 16, and 8 μg/ml for Trichophyton interdigitale, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum isolates, respectively. The corresponding values for nano fluconazole were 8 μg/ml for the three tested species. CONCLUSION: MIC value for nano-fluconazole was lower than conventional fluconazole in all dermatophytes species tested; therefore, nano-fluconazole could inhibit the growth of dermatophytes better than fluconazole at a lower concentration of the drug.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7719649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77196492020-12-17 In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal BAYAT, Mansour Iran J Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducted in the Laboratory of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2018) evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of nano fluconazole compared to conventional fluconazole on dermatophyte isolates using CLSI M38-A2guidelines. Dermatophyte species isolated from clinical cases of dermatophytosis were identified using PCR sequencing techniques. Zeta potential and size of the nano particles containing fluconazole were measured; scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine nano particle structure. RESULTS: The size of liposomal fluconazole obtained was 88.9 ± 12.14 nm with –20.12 ± 3.8 mV for zeta potential. The encapsulation rate for fluconazole was 75.1± 4.2%. MIC(50) for the three tested species was 32, 16, and 8 μg/ml for Trichophyton interdigitale, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum isolates, respectively. The corresponding values for nano fluconazole were 8 μg/ml for the three tested species. CONCLUSION: MIC value for nano-fluconazole was lower than conventional fluconazole in all dermatophytes species tested; therefore, nano-fluconazole could inhibit the growth of dermatophytes better than fluconazole at a lower concentration of the drug. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7719649/ /pubmed/33346221 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701 Text en Copyright© Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat
HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal
BAYAT, Mansour
In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title_full In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title_fullStr In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title_full_unstemmed In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title_short In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
title_sort in-vitro activity of nano fluconazole and conventional fluconazole against clinically important dermatophytes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346221
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701
work_keys_str_mv AT musavibafruinajmossadat invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes
AT hashemihazavehseyedjamal invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes
AT bayatmansour invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes