Cargando…
In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes
BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducte...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346221 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701 |
_version_ | 1783619717860163584 |
---|---|
author | MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal BAYAT, Mansour |
author_facet | MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal BAYAT, Mansour |
author_sort | MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducted in the Laboratory of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2018) evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of nano fluconazole compared to conventional fluconazole on dermatophyte isolates using CLSI M38-A2guidelines. Dermatophyte species isolated from clinical cases of dermatophytosis were identified using PCR sequencing techniques. Zeta potential and size of the nano particles containing fluconazole were measured; scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine nano particle structure. RESULTS: The size of liposomal fluconazole obtained was 88.9 ± 12.14 nm with –20.12 ± 3.8 mV for zeta potential. The encapsulation rate for fluconazole was 75.1± 4.2%. MIC(50) for the three tested species was 32, 16, and 8 μg/ml for Trichophyton interdigitale, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum isolates, respectively. The corresponding values for nano fluconazole were 8 μg/ml for the three tested species. CONCLUSION: MIC value for nano-fluconazole was lower than conventional fluconazole in all dermatophytes species tested; therefore, nano-fluconazole could inhibit the growth of dermatophytes better than fluconazole at a lower concentration of the drug. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7719649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77196492020-12-17 In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal BAYAT, Mansour Iran J Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. METHODS: This study (Conducted in the Laboratory of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2018) evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of nano fluconazole compared to conventional fluconazole on dermatophyte isolates using CLSI M38-A2guidelines. Dermatophyte species isolated from clinical cases of dermatophytosis were identified using PCR sequencing techniques. Zeta potential and size of the nano particles containing fluconazole were measured; scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine nano particle structure. RESULTS: The size of liposomal fluconazole obtained was 88.9 ± 12.14 nm with –20.12 ± 3.8 mV for zeta potential. The encapsulation rate for fluconazole was 75.1± 4.2%. MIC(50) for the three tested species was 32, 16, and 8 μg/ml for Trichophyton interdigitale, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum isolates, respectively. The corresponding values for nano fluconazole were 8 μg/ml for the three tested species. CONCLUSION: MIC value for nano-fluconazole was lower than conventional fluconazole in all dermatophytes species tested; therefore, nano-fluconazole could inhibit the growth of dermatophytes better than fluconazole at a lower concentration of the drug. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7719649/ /pubmed/33346221 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701 Text en Copyright© Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article MUSAVI BAFRUI, Najmossadat HASHEMI HAZAVEH, Seyed Jamal BAYAT, Mansour In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title | In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title_full | In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title_fullStr | In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title_full_unstemmed | In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title_short | In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Fluconazole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes |
title_sort | in-vitro activity of nano fluconazole and conventional fluconazole against clinically important dermatophytes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7719649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346221 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT musavibafruinajmossadat invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes AT hashemihazavehseyedjamal invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes AT bayatmansour invitroactivityofnanofluconazoleandconventionalfluconazoleagainstclinicallyimportantdermatophytes |