Cargando…

Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Single-lumen 4Fr or double-lumen 5Fr power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are not accurate for trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD), since they overestimate cardiac index and other TPTD-derived parameters when compared with centrally inserted central catheter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Arrigo, Sonia, Sandroni, Claudio, Cacciola, Sofia, Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria, Pittiruti, Mauro, Annetta, Maria Giuseppina, Colosimo, Cesare, Antonelli, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00785-2
_version_ 1783619789899431936
author D’Arrigo, Sonia
Sandroni, Claudio
Cacciola, Sofia
Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria
Pittiruti, Mauro
Annetta, Maria Giuseppina
Colosimo, Cesare
Antonelli, Massimo
author_facet D’Arrigo, Sonia
Sandroni, Claudio
Cacciola, Sofia
Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria
Pittiruti, Mauro
Annetta, Maria Giuseppina
Colosimo, Cesare
Antonelli, Massimo
author_sort D’Arrigo, Sonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-lumen 4Fr or double-lumen 5Fr power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are not accurate for trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD), since they overestimate cardiac index and other TPTD-derived parameters when compared with centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) because of the smaller size of their lumen. We hypothesize that PICCs with larger lumen size may be reliable for the cardiac index assessment using the TPTD. METHODS: This is a single-centre, prospective method–comparison study that included adult patients admitted in ICU who required a calibrated Pulse Contour hemodynamic monitoring system (VolumeView/EV1000™) for circulatory shock and had both PICC and CICC in place. We compared TPTD measurements via single-lumen 5Fr or triple-lumen 6Fr polyurethane power injectable PICCs with triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (reference standard). To rule out biases related to manual injection, measurements were repeated using an automated rapid injection system. We performed Bland–Altman analysis accounting for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: A total of 320 measurements were performed in 15 patients. During the manual phase, the cardiac index measured with either single-lumen 5Fr or triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs were comparable with cardiac index measured with triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (3.2 ± 1.04 vs. 3.2 ± 1.06 L/min/m(2), bias 2.2% and 3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m(2), bias 8.5%, respectively). During the automated phase, triple-lumen 6Fr PICC slightly overestimated the cardiac index when compared to triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (CI 3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m(2), bias 12.5%; p = 0.012). For both single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs, percentage error vs. triple-lumen 7Fr CICC was below 20% (14.7% and 19% during the manual phase and 14.4% and 13.8% during the automated phase, respectively). Similar results were observed for TPTD-derived parameters. CONCLUSIONS: During hemodynamic monitoring with TPTD, both single-lumen 5Fr PICCs and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs can be used for cold fluid bolus injection as an alternative to CICC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04241926).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77200302020-12-07 Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study D’Arrigo, Sonia Sandroni, Claudio Cacciola, Sofia Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria Pittiruti, Mauro Annetta, Maria Giuseppina Colosimo, Cesare Antonelli, Massimo Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Single-lumen 4Fr or double-lumen 5Fr power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are not accurate for trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD), since they overestimate cardiac index and other TPTD-derived parameters when compared with centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) because of the smaller size of their lumen. We hypothesize that PICCs with larger lumen size may be reliable for the cardiac index assessment using the TPTD. METHODS: This is a single-centre, prospective method–comparison study that included adult patients admitted in ICU who required a calibrated Pulse Contour hemodynamic monitoring system (VolumeView/EV1000™) for circulatory shock and had both PICC and CICC in place. We compared TPTD measurements via single-lumen 5Fr or triple-lumen 6Fr polyurethane power injectable PICCs with triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (reference standard). To rule out biases related to manual injection, measurements were repeated using an automated rapid injection system. We performed Bland–Altman analysis accounting for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: A total of 320 measurements were performed in 15 patients. During the manual phase, the cardiac index measured with either single-lumen 5Fr or triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs were comparable with cardiac index measured with triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (3.2 ± 1.04 vs. 3.2 ± 1.06 L/min/m(2), bias 2.2% and 3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m(2), bias 8.5%, respectively). During the automated phase, triple-lumen 6Fr PICC slightly overestimated the cardiac index when compared to triple-lumen 7Fr CICC (CI 3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m(2), bias 12.5%; p = 0.012). For both single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs, percentage error vs. triple-lumen 7Fr CICC was below 20% (14.7% and 19% during the manual phase and 14.4% and 13.8% during the automated phase, respectively). Similar results were observed for TPTD-derived parameters. CONCLUSIONS: During hemodynamic monitoring with TPTD, both single-lumen 5Fr PICCs and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs can be used for cold fluid bolus injection as an alternative to CICC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04241926). Springer International Publishing 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7720030/ /pubmed/33284392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00785-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
D’Arrigo, Sonia
Sandroni, Claudio
Cacciola, Sofia
Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria
Pittiruti, Mauro
Annetta, Maria Giuseppina
Colosimo, Cesare
Antonelli, Massimo
Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title_full Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title_fullStr Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title_short Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study
title_sort are single-lumen 5fr and triple-lumen 6fr piccs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00785-2
work_keys_str_mv AT darrigosonia aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT sandroniclaudio aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT cacciolasofia aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT dellannaantoniomaria aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT pittirutimauro aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT annettamariagiuseppina aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT colosimocesare aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy
AT antonellimassimo aresinglelumen5frandtriplelumen6frpiccssuitableforhemodynamicassessmentbytranspulmonarythermodilutionapilotstudy