Cargando…
Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
In this meta-study, we analyzed 2442 effect sizes from 131 meta-analyses in intelligence research, published from 1984 to 2014, to estimate the average effect size, median power, and evidence for bias. We found that the average effect size in intelligence research was a Pearson’s correlation of 0.26...
Autores principales: | Nuijten, Michèle B., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Augusteijn, Hilde E. M., Crompvoets, Elise A. V., Wicherts, Jelte M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040036 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology
por: Maassen, Esther, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
por: Wicherts, Jelte M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
por: van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., et al.
Publicado: (2014)