Cargando…

Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of velocity dependent resistance (VDR) can provide insights into spasticity in individuals with upper motor neuron syndrome. This study investigates the relationship between Modified Ashworth scores and a biomechanical based representation of VDR using a rehabilitation robot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seth, Nitin, Johnson, Denise, Allen, Brian, Abdullah, Hussein A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320929535
_version_ 1783619830872539136
author Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Allen, Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A
author_facet Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Allen, Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A
author_sort Seth, Nitin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Assessment of velocity dependent resistance (VDR) can provide insights into spasticity in individuals with upper motor neuron syndrome. This study investigates the relationship between Modified Ashworth scores and a biomechanical based representation of VDR using a rehabilitation robot. Comparisons in VDR are made for the upper limb (UL) between individuals with acquired brain injury and healthy controls for the para-sagittal plane. METHODS: The system manipulates the individual’s limb through five flexion and extension motions at increasing speeds to obtain force profiles at different velocities. An approximation of VDR is calculated and analyzed statistically against clinical scales and tested for interactions. RESULTS: All individuals (aged 18–65), including healthy controls exhibited VDR greater than 0 (P < 0.05). MAS scores were found to be related to VDR (P < 0.05) with an interaction found between MAS Bicep and Tricep scores (P < 0.01). Considering this interaction, evidence of differences in VDR were found between several neighboring assessment score combinations. CONCLUSION: The robot can detect and quantify VDR that captures information relevant to UL spasticity. Results suggests a better categorization of VDR is possible and supports further development of rehabilitation robotics for assisting spasticity assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77203362020-12-15 Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls Seth, Nitin Johnson, Denise Allen, Brian Abdullah, Hussein A J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article INTRODUCTION: Assessment of velocity dependent resistance (VDR) can provide insights into spasticity in individuals with upper motor neuron syndrome. This study investigates the relationship between Modified Ashworth scores and a biomechanical based representation of VDR using a rehabilitation robot. Comparisons in VDR are made for the upper limb (UL) between individuals with acquired brain injury and healthy controls for the para-sagittal plane. METHODS: The system manipulates the individual’s limb through five flexion and extension motions at increasing speeds to obtain force profiles at different velocities. An approximation of VDR is calculated and analyzed statistically against clinical scales and tested for interactions. RESULTS: All individuals (aged 18–65), including healthy controls exhibited VDR greater than 0 (P < 0.05). MAS scores were found to be related to VDR (P < 0.05) with an interaction found between MAS Bicep and Tricep scores (P < 0.01). Considering this interaction, evidence of differences in VDR were found between several neighboring assessment score combinations. CONCLUSION: The robot can detect and quantify VDR that captures information relevant to UL spasticity. Results suggests a better categorization of VDR is possible and supports further development of rehabilitation robotics for assisting spasticity assessment. SAGE Publications 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7720336/ /pubmed/33329901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320929535 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Allen, Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A
Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title_full Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title_fullStr Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title_short Upper limb robotic assessment: Pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
title_sort upper limb robotic assessment: pilot study comparing velocity dependent resistance in individuals with acquired brain injury to healthy controls
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320929535
work_keys_str_mv AT sethnitin upperlimbroboticassessmentpilotstudycomparingvelocitydependentresistanceinindividualswithacquiredbraininjurytohealthycontrols
AT johnsondenise upperlimbroboticassessmentpilotstudycomparingvelocitydependentresistanceinindividualswithacquiredbraininjurytohealthycontrols
AT allenbrian upperlimbroboticassessmentpilotstudycomparingvelocitydependentresistanceinindividualswithacquiredbraininjurytohealthycontrols
AT abdullahhusseina upperlimbroboticassessmentpilotstudycomparingvelocitydependentresistanceinindividualswithacquiredbraininjurytohealthycontrols