Cargando…

Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report

Amniotic membrane grafts (AMGs) are commonly used to treat a variety of ophthalmologic conditions. Complications exist with permanent tarsorrhaphies, including the risk of re-fusion following tarsorrhaphy separation. We report a novel application of amniotic graft in lieu of skin grafts to protect t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, G. Bryant, Reed, Donovan S., Soeken, Timothy A., Davies, Brett W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515841420971927
_version_ 1783619832286019584
author Giles, G. Bryant
Reed, Donovan S.
Soeken, Timothy A.
Davies, Brett W.
author_facet Giles, G. Bryant
Reed, Donovan S.
Soeken, Timothy A.
Davies, Brett W.
author_sort Giles, G. Bryant
collection PubMed
description Amniotic membrane grafts (AMGs) are commonly used to treat a variety of ophthalmologic conditions. Complications exist with permanent tarsorrhaphies, including the risk of re-fusion following tarsorrhaphy separation. We report a novel application of amniotic graft in lieu of skin grafts to protect the exposed marginal surface during the initial re-epithelialization period following release of a permanent tarsorrhaphy. We present a 24-year-old man who sustained an 80% total body surface area burn from a motor vehicle accident 16 months prior to presentation at our Oculoplastic service for evaluation of residual lagophthalmos. His original permanent tarsorrhaphies were removed; however, re-fusion occurred temporally in both sides. During a second attempt, AMGs were secured over the eyelid margins, leading to a successful tarsorrhaphy takedown without re-fusion. Periocular burn injuries present particular challenges, as cicatricial changes continue to evolve and viable skin graft areas diminish with each successive graft. In the setting of recurrent auto-tarsorrhaphy, the AMG has shown to be a viable alternative to standard skin grafting. This case demonstrates excellent results in a skin graft sparing procedure that is effective and efficient. Amniotic membrane grafting reduces morbidity by foregoing skin graft donor sites and can achieve similar functional and cosmetic results to standard skin grafting with reduced overall surgical time. As such, AMGs have the potential to supplant standard skin grafting in cases of recurrent auto-tarsorrhaphy, particularly in the setting of diminished available healthy skin tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77203422020-12-15 Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report Giles, G. Bryant Reed, Donovan S. Soeken, Timothy A. Davies, Brett W. Ther Adv Ophthalmol Case Report Amniotic membrane grafts (AMGs) are commonly used to treat a variety of ophthalmologic conditions. Complications exist with permanent tarsorrhaphies, including the risk of re-fusion following tarsorrhaphy separation. We report a novel application of amniotic graft in lieu of skin grafts to protect the exposed marginal surface during the initial re-epithelialization period following release of a permanent tarsorrhaphy. We present a 24-year-old man who sustained an 80% total body surface area burn from a motor vehicle accident 16 months prior to presentation at our Oculoplastic service for evaluation of residual lagophthalmos. His original permanent tarsorrhaphies were removed; however, re-fusion occurred temporally in both sides. During a second attempt, AMGs were secured over the eyelid margins, leading to a successful tarsorrhaphy takedown without re-fusion. Periocular burn injuries present particular challenges, as cicatricial changes continue to evolve and viable skin graft areas diminish with each successive graft. In the setting of recurrent auto-tarsorrhaphy, the AMG has shown to be a viable alternative to standard skin grafting. This case demonstrates excellent results in a skin graft sparing procedure that is effective and efficient. Amniotic membrane grafting reduces morbidity by foregoing skin graft donor sites and can achieve similar functional and cosmetic results to standard skin grafting with reduced overall surgical time. As such, AMGs have the potential to supplant standard skin grafting in cases of recurrent auto-tarsorrhaphy, particularly in the setting of diminished available healthy skin tissue. SAGE Publications 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7720342/ /pubmed/33330835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515841420971927 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Case Report
Giles, G. Bryant
Reed, Donovan S.
Soeken, Timothy A.
Davies, Brett W.
Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title_full Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title_fullStr Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title_short Amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
title_sort amniotic membrane graft in a recurrent re-fusing temporal tarsorrhaphy: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515841420971927
work_keys_str_mv AT gilesgbryant amnioticmembranegraftinarecurrentrefusingtemporaltarsorrhaphyacasereport
AT reeddonovans amnioticmembranegraftinarecurrentrefusingtemporaltarsorrhaphyacasereport
AT soekentimothya amnioticmembranegraftinarecurrentrefusingtemporaltarsorrhaphyacasereport
AT daviesbrettw amnioticmembranegraftinarecurrentrefusingtemporaltarsorrhaphyacasereport