Cargando…
Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of lens thickness (LT) measurements made by contact A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 as well as the influence of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement differences on LT measurement in cataract pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w |
_version_ | 1783619859012124672 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jiayi Li, Chen Wang, Lijun Li, Caixin Li, Xin Lu, Peirong |
author_facet | Xu, Jiayi Li, Chen Wang, Lijun Li, Caixin Li, Xin Lu, Peirong |
author_sort | Xu, Jiayi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of lens thickness (LT) measurements made by contact A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 as well as the influence of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement differences on LT measurement in cataract patients in the two techniques. METHODS: 1247 cataract patients (1247 eyes) participated in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Ocular biometric measurements were performed with Lenstar LS900 and A-scan ultrasonography respectively, and the measured results of AL, ACD and LT were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 in measuring AL and ACD. The average difference of LT was 0.01 mm; the consistency limit was − 0.86 mm, 0.88 mm; and 95.27% of datapoints were within the 95% consistency limit. The consistency of LT measurements between the two techniques was poor for those subjects whose ACD or AL values were beyond the 95% consistency limit. Among the subjects whose AL or ACD values measured by A-scan ultrasonography were greater than those measured by Lenstar LS900, 93.33% of them were within the 95% consistency limit, suggesting that the consistency of LT measurement between the two techniques was poor. Of patients whose ACD or AL measured by A-scan ultrasonography were smaller than that of Lenstar LS900, 96.01% of them were within the 95% consistency limit. CONCLUSIONS: There was good agreement of the LT measurements between A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900, except for the axis deviating from the apparent axis during A-scan ultrasonography. If this error can be avoided, A-scan ultrasonography can replace Lenstar LS900 in LT measurement in cataract patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7720484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77204842020-12-07 Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests Xu, Jiayi Li, Chen Wang, Lijun Li, Caixin Li, Xin Lu, Peirong BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of lens thickness (LT) measurements made by contact A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 as well as the influence of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement differences on LT measurement in cataract patients in the two techniques. METHODS: 1247 cataract patients (1247 eyes) participated in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Ocular biometric measurements were performed with Lenstar LS900 and A-scan ultrasonography respectively, and the measured results of AL, ACD and LT were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 in measuring AL and ACD. The average difference of LT was 0.01 mm; the consistency limit was − 0.86 mm, 0.88 mm; and 95.27% of datapoints were within the 95% consistency limit. The consistency of LT measurements between the two techniques was poor for those subjects whose ACD or AL values were beyond the 95% consistency limit. Among the subjects whose AL or ACD values measured by A-scan ultrasonography were greater than those measured by Lenstar LS900, 93.33% of them were within the 95% consistency limit, suggesting that the consistency of LT measurement between the two techniques was poor. Of patients whose ACD or AL measured by A-scan ultrasonography were smaller than that of Lenstar LS900, 96.01% of them were within the 95% consistency limit. CONCLUSIONS: There was good agreement of the LT measurements between A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900, except for the axis deviating from the apparent axis during A-scan ultrasonography. If this error can be avoided, A-scan ultrasonography can replace Lenstar LS900 in LT measurement in cataract patients. BioMed Central 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7720484/ /pubmed/33287752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Jiayi Li, Chen Wang, Lijun Li, Caixin Li, Xin Lu, Peirong Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title | Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title_full | Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title_fullStr | Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title_short | Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
title_sort | influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujiayi influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests AT lichen influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests AT wanglijun influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests AT licaixin influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests AT lixin influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests AT lupeirong influenceofmeasurementdifferencesofanteriorchamberdepthandaxiallengthonlensthicknessevaluationincataractpatientsacomparisonoftwotests |