Cargando…

Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo

BACKGROUND: Expansion of designated cycling networks increases cycling for transport that, in turn, increases physical activity, contributing to improvement in public health. This paper aims to determine whether cycle-network construction in a large city is cost-effective when compared to the status...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamu, Admassu N., Jbaily, Abdulrahman, Verguet, Stéphane, Robberstad, Bjarne, Norheim, Ole Frithjof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5
_version_ 1783619864707989504
author Lamu, Admassu N.
Jbaily, Abdulrahman
Verguet, Stéphane
Robberstad, Bjarne
Norheim, Ole Frithjof
author_facet Lamu, Admassu N.
Jbaily, Abdulrahman
Verguet, Stéphane
Robberstad, Bjarne
Norheim, Ole Frithjof
author_sort Lamu, Admassu N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Expansion of designated cycling networks increases cycling for transport that, in turn, increases physical activity, contributing to improvement in public health. This paper aims to determine whether cycle-network construction in a large city is cost-effective when compared to the status-quo. We developed a cycle-network investment model (CIM) for Oslo and explored its impact on overall health and wellbeing resulting from the increased physical activity. METHODS: First, we applied a regression technique on cycling data from 123 major European cities to model the effect of additional cycle-networks on the share of cyclists. Second, we used a Markov model to capture health benefits from increased cycling for people starting to ride cycle at the age of 30 over the next 25 years. All health gains were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were estimated in US dollars. Other data to populate the model were derived from a comprehensive literature search of epidemiological and economic evaluation studies. Uncertainty was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Our regression analysis reveals that a 100 km new cycle network construction in Oslo city would increase cycling share by 3%. Under the base-case assumptions, where the benefits of the cycle-network investment relating to increased physical activity are sustained over 25 years, the predicted average increases in costs and QALYs per person are $416 and 0.019, respectively. Thus, the incremental costs are $22,350 per QALY gained. This is considered highly cost-effective in a Norwegian setting. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of CIM as part of a public health program to improve physical activity and consequently avert morbidity and mortality. CIM is affordable and has a long-term effect on physical activity that in turn has a positive impact on health improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77205092020-12-07 Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo Lamu, Admassu N. Jbaily, Abdulrahman Verguet, Stéphane Robberstad, Bjarne Norheim, Ole Frithjof BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Expansion of designated cycling networks increases cycling for transport that, in turn, increases physical activity, contributing to improvement in public health. This paper aims to determine whether cycle-network construction in a large city is cost-effective when compared to the status-quo. We developed a cycle-network investment model (CIM) for Oslo and explored its impact on overall health and wellbeing resulting from the increased physical activity. METHODS: First, we applied a regression technique on cycling data from 123 major European cities to model the effect of additional cycle-networks on the share of cyclists. Second, we used a Markov model to capture health benefits from increased cycling for people starting to ride cycle at the age of 30 over the next 25 years. All health gains were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were estimated in US dollars. Other data to populate the model were derived from a comprehensive literature search of epidemiological and economic evaluation studies. Uncertainty was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Our regression analysis reveals that a 100 km new cycle network construction in Oslo city would increase cycling share by 3%. Under the base-case assumptions, where the benefits of the cycle-network investment relating to increased physical activity are sustained over 25 years, the predicted average increases in costs and QALYs per person are $416 and 0.019, respectively. Thus, the incremental costs are $22,350 per QALY gained. This is considered highly cost-effective in a Norwegian setting. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of CIM as part of a public health program to improve physical activity and consequently avert morbidity and mortality. CIM is affordable and has a long-term effect on physical activity that in turn has a positive impact on health improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5. BioMed Central 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7720509/ /pubmed/33287754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lamu, Admassu N.
Jbaily, Abdulrahman
Verguet, Stéphane
Robberstad, Bjarne
Norheim, Ole Frithjof
Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title_full Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title_fullStr Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title_full_unstemmed Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title_short Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo
title_sort is cycle network expansion cost-effective? a health economic evaluation of cycling in oslo
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lamuadmassun iscyclenetworkexpansioncosteffectiveahealtheconomicevaluationofcyclinginoslo
AT jbailyabdulrahman iscyclenetworkexpansioncosteffectiveahealtheconomicevaluationofcyclinginoslo
AT verguetstephane iscyclenetworkexpansioncosteffectiveahealtheconomicevaluationofcyclinginoslo
AT robberstadbjarne iscyclenetworkexpansioncosteffectiveahealtheconomicevaluationofcyclinginoslo
AT norheimolefrithjof iscyclenetworkexpansioncosteffectiveahealtheconomicevaluationofcyclinginoslo