Cargando…

Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a highly prevalent, harmful, and aversive experience which is fundamentally subjective: social isolation alone cannot account for loneliness, and people can experience loneliness even with ample social connections. A number of studies have qualitatively explored experiences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E., Groarke, Jenny M., Turner, Rhiannon N., Yang, Keming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01544-x
_version_ 1783619868284682240
author McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E.
Groarke, Jenny M.
Turner, Rhiannon N.
Yang, Keming
author_facet McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E.
Groarke, Jenny M.
Turner, Rhiannon N.
Yang, Keming
author_sort McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a highly prevalent, harmful, and aversive experience which is fundamentally subjective: social isolation alone cannot account for loneliness, and people can experience loneliness even with ample social connections. A number of studies have qualitatively explored experiences of loneliness; however, the research lacks a comprehensive overview of these experiences. We present a protocol for a study that will, for the first time, systematically review and synthesise the qualitative literature on experiences of loneliness in people of all ages from the general, non-clinical population. The aim is to offer a fine-grained look at experiences of loneliness across the lifespan. METHODS: We will search multiple electronic databases from their inception onwards: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, CINAHL, and the Education Resource Information Center. Sources of grey literature will also be searched. We will include empirical studies published in English including any qualitative study design (e.g. interview, focus group). Studies should focus on individuals from non-clinical populations of any age who describe experiences of loneliness. All citations, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened by one author with a second author ensuring consistency regarding inclusion. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Thematic synthesis will be used to synthesise this literature, and study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The planned review will be reported according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. DISCUSSION: The growing body of research on loneliness predictors, outcomes, and interventions must be grounded in an understanding of the lived experience of loneliness. This systematic review and thematic synthesis will clarify how loneliness is subjectively experienced across the lifespan in the general population. This will allow for a more holistic understanding of the lived experience of loneliness which can inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers working in this important area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178105.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77205282020-12-07 Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E. Groarke, Jenny M. Turner, Rhiannon N. Yang, Keming Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a highly prevalent, harmful, and aversive experience which is fundamentally subjective: social isolation alone cannot account for loneliness, and people can experience loneliness even with ample social connections. A number of studies have qualitatively explored experiences of loneliness; however, the research lacks a comprehensive overview of these experiences. We present a protocol for a study that will, for the first time, systematically review and synthesise the qualitative literature on experiences of loneliness in people of all ages from the general, non-clinical population. The aim is to offer a fine-grained look at experiences of loneliness across the lifespan. METHODS: We will search multiple electronic databases from their inception onwards: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, CINAHL, and the Education Resource Information Center. Sources of grey literature will also be searched. We will include empirical studies published in English including any qualitative study design (e.g. interview, focus group). Studies should focus on individuals from non-clinical populations of any age who describe experiences of loneliness. All citations, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened by one author with a second author ensuring consistency regarding inclusion. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Thematic synthesis will be used to synthesise this literature, and study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The planned review will be reported according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. DISCUSSION: The growing body of research on loneliness predictors, outcomes, and interventions must be grounded in an understanding of the lived experience of loneliness. This systematic review and thematic synthesis will clarify how loneliness is subjectively experienced across the lifespan in the general population. This will allow for a more holistic understanding of the lived experience of loneliness which can inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers working in this important area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178105. BioMed Central 2020-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7720528/ /pubmed/33280605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01544-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E.
Groarke, Jenny M.
Turner, Rhiannon N.
Yang, Keming
Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title_full Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title_fullStr Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title_short Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
title_sort experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01544-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mckennaplumleyphoebee experiencesoflonelinessastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeliterature
AT groarkejennym experiencesoflonelinessastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeliterature
AT turnerrhiannonn experiencesoflonelinessastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeliterature
AT yangkeming experiencesoflonelinessastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeliterature