Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study
BACKGROUND: Chemomechanical caries removal has been a new leaf for caries excavation in this ultraconservative era of dentistry. BRIX3000 & Carie Care are papain based gel formulations while Smart Burs are polymer burs with self limiting ability. AIM: To compare & evaluate the caries excavat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384489 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_20 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Chemomechanical caries removal has been a new leaf for caries excavation in this ultraconservative era of dentistry. BRIX3000 & Carie Care are papain based gel formulations while Smart Burs are polymer burs with self limiting ability. AIM: To compare & evaluate the caries excavation efficacy of BRIX3000, Carie Care & Smart burs. MATERIALS & METHODS: 45 patients with wide class 1 carious lesions were selected and equally divided into 3 groups: BRIX 3000, Carie Care & Smart Burs. Caries excavation was performed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions in each group & evaluation for reduction in bacterial count & mean working time was done. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data was analysed by One way ANOVA, Paired t-Test & Tukey's Post Hoc test. RESULTS: The highest reduction in bacterial count was achieved by BRIX3000(156.93 × 10(4)) followed by Smart Burs(139.07× 10(4))& Carie Care(135.80×10(4)) with p>0.5. Mean working time in minutes for excavation was: BRIX3000(13.66), Carie Care(18.30) &Smart Burs(20.60) with p< 0.5. CONCLUSION: All the techniques reduced bacterial count potentially. BRIX 3000 proves the most effective among three. |
---|