Cargando…

Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how

Background: The ‘freeze-all’ practice refers to the cryopreservation of all mature oocytes or viable embryos after ovarian stimulation. The development of the vitrification technique has been crucial to make this approach a reality, since it increases the post-thaw survival rates and permits compara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celada, Paula, Bosch, Ernesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1746870
_version_ 1783619950235090944
author Celada, Paula
Bosch, Ernesto
author_facet Celada, Paula
Bosch, Ernesto
author_sort Celada, Paula
collection PubMed
description Background: The ‘freeze-all’ practice refers to the cryopreservation of all mature oocytes or viable embryos after ovarian stimulation. The development of the vitrification technique has been crucial to make this approach a reality, since it increases the post-thaw survival rates and permits comparable implantation rates with fresh embryos. Nonetheless, as implantation probabilities are comparable to fresh embryo transfer in normo-responder patients, the freeze- all strategy has demonstrated no benefits overall. Method: Narrative review in which we give an overview of this approach, discuss recent advances in the field, as well as for whom, when and how it is recommended to emply the freeze-all technique. Results: However, there is some clinical evidence that shows its feasibility. Thus, it has been demonstrated that elevation of progesterone at the end of ovarian stimulation decreases the implantation rates after the transfer of day 6 blastocysts in fresh and some uterine pathologies; freeze-all is also the preferred option for patients undergoing pre-implantation genetic testing, since there is an improvement of the results and it allows for inclusion of all blastocysts of the cohort. In high responders, the freeze-all strategy optimizes the response whilst also minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Conclusion: Due to the different cases that a reproductive expert might encounter, it is essential to highlight benefits and drawbacks of this practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7720992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77209922020-12-10 Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how Celada, Paula Bosch, Ernesto Ups J Med Sci Review Articles Background: The ‘freeze-all’ practice refers to the cryopreservation of all mature oocytes or viable embryos after ovarian stimulation. The development of the vitrification technique has been crucial to make this approach a reality, since it increases the post-thaw survival rates and permits comparable implantation rates with fresh embryos. Nonetheless, as implantation probabilities are comparable to fresh embryo transfer in normo-responder patients, the freeze- all strategy has demonstrated no benefits overall. Method: Narrative review in which we give an overview of this approach, discuss recent advances in the field, as well as for whom, when and how it is recommended to emply the freeze-all technique. Results: However, there is some clinical evidence that shows its feasibility. Thus, it has been demonstrated that elevation of progesterone at the end of ovarian stimulation decreases the implantation rates after the transfer of day 6 blastocysts in fresh and some uterine pathologies; freeze-all is also the preferred option for patients undergoing pre-implantation genetic testing, since there is an improvement of the results and it allows for inclusion of all blastocysts of the cohort. In high responders, the freeze-all strategy optimizes the response whilst also minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Conclusion: Due to the different cases that a reproductive expert might encounter, it is essential to highlight benefits and drawbacks of this practice. Taylor & Francis 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7720992/ /pubmed/32283988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1746870 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review Articles
Celada, Paula
Bosch, Ernesto
Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title_full Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title_fullStr Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title_full_unstemmed Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title_short Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
title_sort freeze-all, for whom, when, and how
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7720992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1746870
work_keys_str_mv AT celadapaula freezeallforwhomwhenandhow
AT boschernesto freezeallforwhomwhenandhow