Cargando…

Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction: Worldwide cesarean birth had increased over the past three decades and in the USA, the overall rate of cesarean birth has increased from 23.8% in 1989 to 31.9% in 2018. Moreover, the substantial increase of preterm infants delivered by cesarean section had reached anywhere from 45% to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: AlQurashi, Mansour A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304710
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11918
_version_ 1783619966800494592
author AlQurashi, Mansour A
author_facet AlQurashi, Mansour A
author_sort AlQurashi, Mansour A
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Worldwide cesarean birth had increased over the past three decades and in the USA, the overall rate of cesarean birth has increased from 23.8% in 1989 to 31.9% in 2018. Moreover, the substantial increase of preterm infants delivered by cesarean section had reached anywhere from 45% to 72% for gestational age <33 weeks. There is a considerable debate on whether cesarean section confers a survival advantage for preterm infants. Published data on the relationship between mode of delivery and survival rate were inconsistent and there is a lack of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated this important clinical concern. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cesarean section on the survival rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of ≤32 weeks VLBW infants born alive and admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah (KAMC-Jeddah) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate to discharge of VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section compared to delivered vaginally. Relevant demographic and clinical variables were assessed and its association to survival to discharge of VLBW infants were analyzed. Results: Of the 1055 ≤32 weeks VLBW infants included in the study, 559 (53%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 496 (47%) were delivered vaginally. Cesarean delivery had increased from 44.2% to 66% between 1994-1998 and 2014-2019, respectively. The rise of cesarean delivery compared with the vaginal delivery was more profound for gestational age ≤26 weeks and birth weight ≤800 g. The VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate when compared to infants delivered vaginally (87.29% vs 71.77%, P<0.001). The survival advantage was statistically significant in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (801-1000 g) and infants with birth weight ≤800 g, 86.73% vs 73.62%, P=0.018 and 58.02% vs 40.52, P=0.001, respectively. Moreover, VLBW infants ≤26 weeks gestational age delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate of 69.15% vs 44.5%, P<0.001. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that cesarean birth is associated with higher survival for VLBW infants with birth weight ≤800 g and ELBW infants and gestational age ≤26 weeks compared to vaginal birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7721068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77210682020-12-09 Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience AlQurashi, Mansour A Cureus Pediatrics Introduction: Worldwide cesarean birth had increased over the past three decades and in the USA, the overall rate of cesarean birth has increased from 23.8% in 1989 to 31.9% in 2018. Moreover, the substantial increase of preterm infants delivered by cesarean section had reached anywhere from 45% to 72% for gestational age <33 weeks. There is a considerable debate on whether cesarean section confers a survival advantage for preterm infants. Published data on the relationship between mode of delivery and survival rate were inconsistent and there is a lack of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated this important clinical concern. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cesarean section on the survival rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of ≤32 weeks VLBW infants born alive and admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah (KAMC-Jeddah) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate to discharge of VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section compared to delivered vaginally. Relevant demographic and clinical variables were assessed and its association to survival to discharge of VLBW infants were analyzed. Results: Of the 1055 ≤32 weeks VLBW infants included in the study, 559 (53%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 496 (47%) were delivered vaginally. Cesarean delivery had increased from 44.2% to 66% between 1994-1998 and 2014-2019, respectively. The rise of cesarean delivery compared with the vaginal delivery was more profound for gestational age ≤26 weeks and birth weight ≤800 g. The VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate when compared to infants delivered vaginally (87.29% vs 71.77%, P<0.001). The survival advantage was statistically significant in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (801-1000 g) and infants with birth weight ≤800 g, 86.73% vs 73.62%, P=0.018 and 58.02% vs 40.52, P=0.001, respectively. Moreover, VLBW infants ≤26 weeks gestational age delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate of 69.15% vs 44.5%, P<0.001. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that cesarean birth is associated with higher survival for VLBW infants with birth weight ≤800 g and ELBW infants and gestational age ≤26 weeks compared to vaginal birth. Cureus 2020-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7721068/ /pubmed/33304710 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11918 Text en Copyright © 2020, AlQurashi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
AlQurashi, Mansour A
Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort impact of mode of delivery on the survival rate of very low birth weight infants: a single-center experience
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304710
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11918
work_keys_str_mv AT alqurashimansoura impactofmodeofdeliveryonthesurvivalrateofverylowbirthweightinfantsasinglecenterexperience