Cargando…

An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees

There is continued growth in the number of master’s degrees awarded in the life sciences to address the evolving needs of the biomedical workforce. Academic medical centers leverage the expertise of their faculty and industry partners to develop one to two year intensive and multidisciplinary master...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Jack, McKinney, Caleb C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243153
_version_ 1783619986367971328
author Hart, Jack
McKinney, Caleb C.
author_facet Hart, Jack
McKinney, Caleb C.
author_sort Hart, Jack
collection PubMed
description There is continued growth in the number of master’s degrees awarded in the life sciences to address the evolving needs of the biomedical workforce. Academic medical centers leverage the expertise of their faculty and industry partners to develop one to two year intensive and multidisciplinary master’s programs that equip students with advanced scientific skills and practical training experiences. However, there is little data published on the outcomes of these graduates to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs and to inform the return on investment of students. Here, the authors show the first five-year career outlook for master of science graduates from programs housed at an academic medical center. Georgetown University Biomedical Graduate Education researchers analyzed the placement outcomes of 1,204 graduates from 2014–2018, and the two-year outcomes of 412 graduates from 2016 and 2017. From the 15 M.S. programs analyzed, they found that 69% of graduates entered the workforce, while 28% entered an advanced degree program such as a Ph.D., allopathic or osteopathic medicine (M.D. or D.O.), or health professions degree. International students who pursue advanced degrees largely pursued Ph.D. degrees, while domestic students represent the majority of students entering into medical programs. Researchers found that a majority of the alumni that entered the workforce pursue research-based work, with 59% of graduates conducting research-based job functions across industries. Forty-nine percent of employed graduates analyzed from 2016 and 2017 changed employment positions, while 15% entered advanced degree programs. Alumni that changed positions changed companies in the same job function, changed to a position of increasing responsibility in the same or different organization, or changed to a different job function in the same or different company. Overall, standalone master’s programs equip graduates with research skills, analytical prowess, and content expertise, strengthening the talent pipeline of the biomedical workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7721154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77211542020-12-15 An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees Hart, Jack McKinney, Caleb C. PLoS One Research Article There is continued growth in the number of master’s degrees awarded in the life sciences to address the evolving needs of the biomedical workforce. Academic medical centers leverage the expertise of their faculty and industry partners to develop one to two year intensive and multidisciplinary master’s programs that equip students with advanced scientific skills and practical training experiences. However, there is little data published on the outcomes of these graduates to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs and to inform the return on investment of students. Here, the authors show the first five-year career outlook for master of science graduates from programs housed at an academic medical center. Georgetown University Biomedical Graduate Education researchers analyzed the placement outcomes of 1,204 graduates from 2014–2018, and the two-year outcomes of 412 graduates from 2016 and 2017. From the 15 M.S. programs analyzed, they found that 69% of graduates entered the workforce, while 28% entered an advanced degree program such as a Ph.D., allopathic or osteopathic medicine (M.D. or D.O.), or health professions degree. International students who pursue advanced degrees largely pursued Ph.D. degrees, while domestic students represent the majority of students entering into medical programs. Researchers found that a majority of the alumni that entered the workforce pursue research-based work, with 59% of graduates conducting research-based job functions across industries. Forty-nine percent of employed graduates analyzed from 2016 and 2017 changed employment positions, while 15% entered advanced degree programs. Alumni that changed positions changed companies in the same job function, changed to a position of increasing responsibility in the same or different organization, or changed to a different job function in the same or different company. Overall, standalone master’s programs equip graduates with research skills, analytical prowess, and content expertise, strengthening the talent pipeline of the biomedical workforce. Public Library of Science 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7721154/ /pubmed/33284826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243153 Text en © 2020 Hart, McKinney http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hart, Jack
McKinney, Caleb C.
An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title_full An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title_fullStr An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title_full_unstemmed An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title_short An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
title_sort institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master’s degrees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243153
work_keys_str_mv AT hartjack aninstitutionalanalysisofgraduateoutcomesrevealsacontemporaryworkforcefootprintforbiomedicalmastersdegrees
AT mckinneycalebc aninstitutionalanalysisofgraduateoutcomesrevealsacontemporaryworkforcefootprintforbiomedicalmastersdegrees
AT hartjack institutionalanalysisofgraduateoutcomesrevealsacontemporaryworkforcefootprintforbiomedicalmastersdegrees
AT mckinneycalebc institutionalanalysisofgraduateoutcomesrevealsacontemporaryworkforcefootprintforbiomedicalmastersdegrees