Cargando…

Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid

OBJECTIVE: To carry out the meta-analysis on the clinical safety of glycyrrhizic acid and the influencing factors between 18α-glycyrrhizinate (18α-GL) and 18β-glycyrrhizinate (18β-GL). METHODS: Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection was used as the representative preparation of 18α-GL, and compound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hongdou, Zheng, Fangfang, Wang, Menglei, Wang, Xu, Yang, Qingqing, Ye, Lu, Lu, Yao, Yu, Shule, Li, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3869698
_version_ 1783620033104052224
author Chen, Hongdou
Zheng, Fangfang
Wang, Menglei
Wang, Xu
Yang, Qingqing
Ye, Lu
Lu, Yao
Yu, Shule
Li, Wei
author_facet Chen, Hongdou
Zheng, Fangfang
Wang, Menglei
Wang, Xu
Yang, Qingqing
Ye, Lu
Lu, Yao
Yu, Shule
Li, Wei
author_sort Chen, Hongdou
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To carry out the meta-analysis on the clinical safety of glycyrrhizic acid and the influencing factors between 18α-glycyrrhizinate (18α-GL) and 18β-glycyrrhizinate (18β-GL). METHODS: Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection was used as the representative preparation of 18α-GL, and compound glycyrrhizin injection was used as the representative preparation of 18β-GL. The clinical control trial of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection and compound glycyrrhizin injection was searched in a computer, which was published from January 2006 to December 2019 on the databases such as PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ), and Wanfang Medical Network (Wanfang Data). The data associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were extracted. RevMan5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 24 studies were included, and 2757 patients were involved, of which the experimental group was mainly treated with magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate, while the control group was mainly treated with compound glycyrrhizin. The results showed that the occurrence of ADRs was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (RR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.38), P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among the studies (I(2) = 0%, P=1.00). CONCLUSION: Compared with 18β-GL, 18α-GL had a lower incidence of adverse reactions and better clinical safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7721498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77214982020-12-11 Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid Chen, Hongdou Zheng, Fangfang Wang, Menglei Wang, Xu Yang, Qingqing Ye, Lu Lu, Yao Yu, Shule Li, Wei Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article OBJECTIVE: To carry out the meta-analysis on the clinical safety of glycyrrhizic acid and the influencing factors between 18α-glycyrrhizinate (18α-GL) and 18β-glycyrrhizinate (18β-GL). METHODS: Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection was used as the representative preparation of 18α-GL, and compound glycyrrhizin injection was used as the representative preparation of 18β-GL. The clinical control trial of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection and compound glycyrrhizin injection was searched in a computer, which was published from January 2006 to December 2019 on the databases such as PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ), and Wanfang Medical Network (Wanfang Data). The data associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were extracted. RevMan5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 24 studies were included, and 2757 patients were involved, of which the experimental group was mainly treated with magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate, while the control group was mainly treated with compound glycyrrhizin. The results showed that the occurrence of ADRs was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (RR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.38), P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among the studies (I(2) = 0%, P=1.00). CONCLUSION: Compared with 18β-GL, 18α-GL had a lower incidence of adverse reactions and better clinical safety. Hindawi 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7721498/ /pubmed/33312222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3869698 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hongdou Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chen, Hongdou
Zheng, Fangfang
Wang, Menglei
Wang, Xu
Yang, Qingqing
Ye, Lu
Lu, Yao
Yu, Shule
Li, Wei
Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title_full Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title_short Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid
title_sort meta-analysis based on clinical rcts: the effect of molecular epimerism on the safety of glycyrrhizic acid
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3869698
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhongdou metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT zhengfangfang metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT wangmenglei metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT wangxu metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT yangqingqing metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT yelu metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT luyao metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT yushule metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid
AT liwei metaanalysisbasedonclinicalrctstheeffectofmolecularepimerismonthesafetyofglycyrrhizicacid