Cargando…

What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education

Low education is considered an important modifiable risk factor for dementia worldwide, despite the lack of a formal consensus definition of low education. The primary aim of this systematic review was to document and address the inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education in dementia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maccora, Janet, Peters, Ruth, Anstey, Kaarin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100654
_version_ 1783620065353007104
author Maccora, Janet
Peters, Ruth
Anstey, Kaarin J.
author_facet Maccora, Janet
Peters, Ruth
Anstey, Kaarin J.
author_sort Maccora, Janet
collection PubMed
description Low education is considered an important modifiable risk factor for dementia worldwide, despite the lack of a formal consensus definition of low education. The primary aim of this systematic review was to document and address the inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education in dementia studies. A secondary aim was to consider the dose of education required to reduce dementia risk. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration ID CRD42018096168. CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Pubmed databases were searched using terms related to education, dementia and/or MCI, and incidence. Studies were eligible for inclusion if a risk ratio for education and any dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Vascular Dementia (VaD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was reported in a population cognitively healthy at baseline. Sample sizes for 65 studies meeting selection criteria ranged from 152 to 12,881, representing populations from 24 countries. Risk of bias, assessed using a tool designed specifically for dementia risk studies, was found to be medium or low for all studies. There were 23 continuous, 29 dichotomous, and 31 categorical operationalisations of education reported. Random effects meta-analyses from continuous operationalisations suggested each year of education reduced risk by eight percent for AD (95% CI:5–12%) and seven percent for any dementia (95% CI:6–9%). Dichotomous operationalisations indicated an increased risk for low education of 45% (95% CI:29–63%) for any dementia and 85% (95% CI:56–118%) for AD, however definitions of low education were heterogeneous, ranging from zero to 12 years. There were too few studies to produce summary ratios for VaD or MCI. We conclude that, while the evidence of an association between low education and dementia incidence is robust, inconsistency in the definition, measurement and operationalisation of education hinders the translation of this evidence into practical policy recommendations to reduce dementia risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7721642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77216422020-12-11 What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education Maccora, Janet Peters, Ruth Anstey, Kaarin J. SSM Popul Health Review Article Low education is considered an important modifiable risk factor for dementia worldwide, despite the lack of a formal consensus definition of low education. The primary aim of this systematic review was to document and address the inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education in dementia studies. A secondary aim was to consider the dose of education required to reduce dementia risk. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration ID CRD42018096168. CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Pubmed databases were searched using terms related to education, dementia and/or MCI, and incidence. Studies were eligible for inclusion if a risk ratio for education and any dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Vascular Dementia (VaD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was reported in a population cognitively healthy at baseline. Sample sizes for 65 studies meeting selection criteria ranged from 152 to 12,881, representing populations from 24 countries. Risk of bias, assessed using a tool designed specifically for dementia risk studies, was found to be medium or low for all studies. There were 23 continuous, 29 dichotomous, and 31 categorical operationalisations of education reported. Random effects meta-analyses from continuous operationalisations suggested each year of education reduced risk by eight percent for AD (95% CI:5–12%) and seven percent for any dementia (95% CI:6–9%). Dichotomous operationalisations indicated an increased risk for low education of 45% (95% CI:29–63%) for any dementia and 85% (95% CI:56–118%) for AD, however definitions of low education were heterogeneous, ranging from zero to 12 years. There were too few studies to produce summary ratios for VaD or MCI. We conclude that, while the evidence of an association between low education and dementia incidence is robust, inconsistency in the definition, measurement and operationalisation of education hinders the translation of this evidence into practical policy recommendations to reduce dementia risk. Elsevier 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7721642/ /pubmed/33313373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100654 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Maccora, Janet
Peters, Ruth
Anstey, Kaarin J.
What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title_full What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title_fullStr What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title_full_unstemmed What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title_short What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
title_sort what does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100654
work_keys_str_mv AT maccorajanet whatdoesloweducationmeanintermsofdementiariskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysishighlightinginconsistencyinmeasuringandoperationalisingeducation
AT petersruth whatdoesloweducationmeanintermsofdementiariskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysishighlightinginconsistencyinmeasuringandoperationalisingeducation
AT ansteykaarinj whatdoesloweducationmeanintermsofdementiariskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysishighlightinginconsistencyinmeasuringandoperationalisingeducation