Cargando…

A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare early biochemical and histological osseous healing of chronic mandibular defects regenerated with bovine bone substitute with and without collagen membrane in vivo. METHODS: Eight weeks after formation of a lateral full-thickness perforating bone defect in the mand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staedt, Henning, Dau, Michael, Schiegnitz, Eik, Thiem, Daniel G. E., Tagadiuc, Olga, Palarie, Victor, Ottl, Peter, Al-Nawas, Bilal, Kämmerer, Peer W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00249-9
_version_ 1783620125884153856
author Staedt, Henning
Dau, Michael
Schiegnitz, Eik
Thiem, Daniel G. E.
Tagadiuc, Olga
Palarie, Victor
Ottl, Peter
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Kämmerer, Peer W.
author_facet Staedt, Henning
Dau, Michael
Schiegnitz, Eik
Thiem, Daniel G. E.
Tagadiuc, Olga
Palarie, Victor
Ottl, Peter
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Kämmerer, Peer W.
author_sort Staedt, Henning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare early biochemical and histological osseous healing of chronic mandibular defects regenerated with bovine bone substitute with and without collagen membrane in vivo. METHODS: Eight weeks after formation of a lateral full-thickness perforating bone defect in the mandible of 40 rabbits, bovine bone substitute with (“+”;n = 20) and without (“-”;n = 20) collagen membrane was applied. Blood and bone was collected 24, 72 h, 7, 14 and 21 days after surgery. Total acid phosphatase, bone acid phosphatase, total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase activities were compared between groups. Formation of new bone was quantified histologically for all time points. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after surgery, bone alkaline phosphatase was significantly elevated in “+” group when compared to “-” (p=0.012). After 72 hours, all bone turnover markers except for total acid phosphatase (p=0.078) where significantly elevated in “+” (all p < 0.05). Fourteen days after surgery, the significant highest values for all bone turnover markers were detected in “-” (all p < 0.05). A significant difference in favor of group “-” could also be detected after 3 weeks in terms of both acid phosphatases (p < 0.05). In histology, no significant differences could be detected. CONCLUSION: Bone regeneration with bovine bone substitute material and collagen membrane shows a significantly earlier bone remodeling activity but does not seem to influence formation of new bone in histological samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77223102020-12-08 A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone Staedt, Henning Dau, Michael Schiegnitz, Eik Thiem, Daniel G. E. Tagadiuc, Olga Palarie, Victor Ottl, Peter Al-Nawas, Bilal Kämmerer, Peer W. Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare early biochemical and histological osseous healing of chronic mandibular defects regenerated with bovine bone substitute with and without collagen membrane in vivo. METHODS: Eight weeks after formation of a lateral full-thickness perforating bone defect in the mandible of 40 rabbits, bovine bone substitute with (“+”;n = 20) and without (“-”;n = 20) collagen membrane was applied. Blood and bone was collected 24, 72 h, 7, 14 and 21 days after surgery. Total acid phosphatase, bone acid phosphatase, total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase activities were compared between groups. Formation of new bone was quantified histologically for all time points. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after surgery, bone alkaline phosphatase was significantly elevated in “+” group when compared to “-” (p=0.012). After 72 hours, all bone turnover markers except for total acid phosphatase (p=0.078) where significantly elevated in “+” (all p < 0.05). Fourteen days after surgery, the significant highest values for all bone turnover markers were detected in “-” (all p < 0.05). A significant difference in favor of group “-” could also be detected after 3 weeks in terms of both acid phosphatases (p < 0.05). In histology, no significant differences could be detected. CONCLUSION: Bone regeneration with bovine bone substitute material and collagen membrane shows a significantly earlier bone remodeling activity but does not seem to influence formation of new bone in histological samples. BioMed Central 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7722310/ /pubmed/33287844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00249-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Staedt, Henning
Dau, Michael
Schiegnitz, Eik
Thiem, Daniel G. E.
Tagadiuc, Olga
Palarie, Victor
Ottl, Peter
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Kämmerer, Peer W.
A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title_full A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title_fullStr A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title_full_unstemmed A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title_short A collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
title_sort collagen membrane influences bone turnover marker in vivo after bone augmentation with xenogenic bone
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00249-9
work_keys_str_mv AT staedthenning acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT daumichael acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT schiegnitzeik acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT thiemdanielge acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT tagadiucolga acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT palarievictor acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT ottlpeter acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT alnawasbilal acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT kammererpeerw acollagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT staedthenning collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT daumichael collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT schiegnitzeik collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT thiemdanielge collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT tagadiucolga collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT palarievictor collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT ottlpeter collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT alnawasbilal collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone
AT kammererpeerw collagenmembraneinfluencesboneturnovermarkerinvivoafterboneaugmentationwithxenogenicbone