Cargando…

Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fell, Deshayne B., Wilson, Lindsay A., Hawken, Steven, Spruin, Sarah, Murphy, Malia, Potter, Beth K., Little, Julian, Chakraborty, Pranesh, Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry, Wilson, Kumanan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048
_version_ 1783620135027736576
author Fell, Deshayne B.
Wilson, Lindsay A.
Hawken, Steven
Spruin, Sarah
Murphy, Malia
Potter, Beth K.
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry
Wilson, Kumanan
author_facet Fell, Deshayne B.
Wilson, Lindsay A.
Hawken, Steven
Spruin, Sarah
Murphy, Malia
Potter, Beth K.
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry
Wilson, Kumanan
author_sort Fell, Deshayne B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identify infant deaths within 6 months in a source population of live-born infants between 2010 and 2014. We used a nested case-control study design, in which all infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age were included as cases, and a random sample of infants from the source population were selected as controls and were matched to cases at a ratio of 10:1. We examined the association between mortality and screening analytes (acylcarnitines, amino acids, fetal-to-adult hemoglobin ratio, endocrine markers, and enzymes) using lasso regression to fit multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 350 infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age, and 3498 matched controls with complete data, our multivariable model demonstrated only modest ability to identify infant deaths (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find newborn screening analytes to be strongly predictive of infant mortality between 7 days and 6 months of age in the general population of newborns. Future studies should investigate whether predictive modeling within more homogeneous cause-of-death categories could lead to improved predictive ability for infant mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77223512020-12-28 Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality Fell, Deshayne B. Wilson, Lindsay A. Hawken, Steven Spruin, Sarah Murphy, Malia Potter, Beth K. Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry Wilson, Kumanan J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Short Report OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identify infant deaths within 6 months in a source population of live-born infants between 2010 and 2014. We used a nested case-control study design, in which all infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age were included as cases, and a random sample of infants from the source population were selected as controls and were matched to cases at a ratio of 10:1. We examined the association between mortality and screening analytes (acylcarnitines, amino acids, fetal-to-adult hemoglobin ratio, endocrine markers, and enzymes) using lasso regression to fit multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 350 infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age, and 3498 matched controls with complete data, our multivariable model demonstrated only modest ability to identify infant deaths (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find newborn screening analytes to be strongly predictive of infant mortality between 7 days and 6 months of age in the general population of newborns. Future studies should investigate whether predictive modeling within more homogeneous cause-of-death categories could lead to improved predictive ability for infant mortality. Taylor & Francis Group 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7722351/ /pubmed/31046492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Report
Fell, Deshayne B.
Wilson, Lindsay A.
Hawken, Steven
Spruin, Sarah
Murphy, Malia
Potter, Beth K.
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry
Wilson, Kumanan
Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title_full Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title_fullStr Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title_full_unstemmed Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title_short Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
title_sort association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048
work_keys_str_mv AT felldeshayneb associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT wilsonlindsaya associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT hawkensteven associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT spruinsarah associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT murphymalia associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT potterbethk associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT littlejulian associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT chakrabortypranesh associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT lacazemasmonteilthierry associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality
AT wilsonkumanan associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality