Cargando…
Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048 |
_version_ | 1783620135027736576 |
---|---|
author | Fell, Deshayne B. Wilson, Lindsay A. Hawken, Steven Spruin, Sarah Murphy, Malia Potter, Beth K. Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry Wilson, Kumanan |
author_facet | Fell, Deshayne B. Wilson, Lindsay A. Hawken, Steven Spruin, Sarah Murphy, Malia Potter, Beth K. Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry Wilson, Kumanan |
author_sort | Fell, Deshayne B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identify infant deaths within 6 months in a source population of live-born infants between 2010 and 2014. We used a nested case-control study design, in which all infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age were included as cases, and a random sample of infants from the source population were selected as controls and were matched to cases at a ratio of 10:1. We examined the association between mortality and screening analytes (acylcarnitines, amino acids, fetal-to-adult hemoglobin ratio, endocrine markers, and enzymes) using lasso regression to fit multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 350 infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age, and 3498 matched controls with complete data, our multivariable model demonstrated only modest ability to identify infant deaths (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find newborn screening analytes to be strongly predictive of infant mortality between 7 days and 6 months of age in the general population of newborns. Future studies should investigate whether predictive modeling within more homogeneous cause-of-death categories could lead to improved predictive ability for infant mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7722351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77223512020-12-28 Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality Fell, Deshayne B. Wilson, Lindsay A. Hawken, Steven Spruin, Sarah Murphy, Malia Potter, Beth K. Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry Wilson, Kumanan J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Short Report OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life. METHODS: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identify infant deaths within 6 months in a source population of live-born infants between 2010 and 2014. We used a nested case-control study design, in which all infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age were included as cases, and a random sample of infants from the source population were selected as controls and were matched to cases at a ratio of 10:1. We examined the association between mortality and screening analytes (acylcarnitines, amino acids, fetal-to-adult hemoglobin ratio, endocrine markers, and enzymes) using lasso regression to fit multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 350 infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age, and 3498 matched controls with complete data, our multivariable model demonstrated only modest ability to identify infant deaths (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.71). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find newborn screening analytes to be strongly predictive of infant mortality between 7 days and 6 months of age in the general population of newborns. Future studies should investigate whether predictive modeling within more homogeneous cause-of-death categories could lead to improved predictive ability for infant mortality. Taylor & Francis Group 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7722351/ /pubmed/31046492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Fell, Deshayne B. Wilson, Lindsay A. Hawken, Steven Spruin, Sarah Murphy, Malia Potter, Beth K. Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry Wilson, Kumanan Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title | Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title_full | Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title_fullStr | Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title_short | Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
title_sort | association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1615048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT felldeshayneb associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT wilsonlindsaya associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT hawkensteven associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT spruinsarah associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT murphymalia associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT potterbethk associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT littlejulian associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT chakrabortypranesh associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT lacazemasmonteilthierry associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality AT wilsonkumanan associationbetweennewbornscreeninganalyteprofilesandinfantmortality |