Cargando…

External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study

OBJECTIVES: Performing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal intensive care is challenging in many ways. While restrictive inclusion criteria or busy study protocols are obvious barriers, external barriers leading to termination of a study are seldom discussed. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mörelius, Evalotte, Olsson, Emma, Sahlén Helmer, Charlotte, Thernström Blomqvist, Ylva, Angelhoff, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040991
_version_ 1783620137656516608
author Mörelius, Evalotte
Olsson, Emma
Sahlén Helmer, Charlotte
Thernström Blomqvist, Ylva
Angelhoff, Charlotte
author_facet Mörelius, Evalotte
Olsson, Emma
Sahlén Helmer, Charlotte
Thernström Blomqvist, Ylva
Angelhoff, Charlotte
author_sort Mörelius, Evalotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Performing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal intensive care is challenging in many ways. While restrictive inclusion criteria or busy study protocols are obvious barriers, external barriers leading to termination of a study are seldom discussed. The aim of this study was to describe barriers for inclusion of families in neonatal intensive care in an RCT aiming to evaluate the effects of continuous skin-to-skin contact on mood and sleep quality in parents of preterm infants, as well as the quality of parent-infant interaction and salivary cortisol concentrations at the time of discharge. DESIGN: A descriptive study. SETTING: Three out of seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Sweden participated in a two-arm RCT that was terminated because of low inclusion rate. PARTICIPANTS: Before termination of the study, 11 out of 242 families assessed for eligibility were included for participation. RESULTS: The major barriers for inclusion in this RCT were external due to (1) lack of intensive care beds in the neonatal ward, causing medically stable infants to be transferred back to the referring hospital quicker than expected, (2) moving directly from the delivery room to a family room without passing an open bay intensive care room or (3) transferring from one neonatal ward to another with the same care level to increase availability of intensive care beds where needed. Other barriers were the inclusion criteria ‘single-birth’ and ‘Swedish-speaking parent’. CONCLUSIONS: The major barriers for including participants were external constituted by transferals between neonatal wards and cities due to lack of intensive care beds. This is a multifactorial issue related to organisational structures. However, since this affects the possibilities to perform research this study highlights some suggestions to consider when planning prospective intervention studies within a neonatal setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03004677.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77223642020-12-14 External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study Mörelius, Evalotte Olsson, Emma Sahlén Helmer, Charlotte Thernström Blomqvist, Ylva Angelhoff, Charlotte BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVES: Performing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal intensive care is challenging in many ways. While restrictive inclusion criteria or busy study protocols are obvious barriers, external barriers leading to termination of a study are seldom discussed. The aim of this study was to describe barriers for inclusion of families in neonatal intensive care in an RCT aiming to evaluate the effects of continuous skin-to-skin contact on mood and sleep quality in parents of preterm infants, as well as the quality of parent-infant interaction and salivary cortisol concentrations at the time of discharge. DESIGN: A descriptive study. SETTING: Three out of seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Sweden participated in a two-arm RCT that was terminated because of low inclusion rate. PARTICIPANTS: Before termination of the study, 11 out of 242 families assessed for eligibility were included for participation. RESULTS: The major barriers for inclusion in this RCT were external due to (1) lack of intensive care beds in the neonatal ward, causing medically stable infants to be transferred back to the referring hospital quicker than expected, (2) moving directly from the delivery room to a family room without passing an open bay intensive care room or (3) transferring from one neonatal ward to another with the same care level to increase availability of intensive care beds where needed. Other barriers were the inclusion criteria ‘single-birth’ and ‘Swedish-speaking parent’. CONCLUSIONS: The major barriers for including participants were external constituted by transferals between neonatal wards and cities due to lack of intensive care beds. This is a multifactorial issue related to organisational structures. However, since this affects the possibilities to perform research this study highlights some suggestions to consider when planning prospective intervention studies within a neonatal setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03004677. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7722364/ /pubmed/33277288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040991 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Mörelius, Evalotte
Olsson, Emma
Sahlén Helmer, Charlotte
Thernström Blomqvist, Ylva
Angelhoff, Charlotte
External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title_full External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title_fullStr External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title_short External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study
title_sort external barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in sweden: a descriptive study
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040991
work_keys_str_mv AT moreliusevalotte externalbarriersforincludingparentsofpreterminfantsinarandomisedclinicaltrialintheneonatalintensivecareunitinswedenadescriptivestudy
AT olssonemma externalbarriersforincludingparentsofpreterminfantsinarandomisedclinicaltrialintheneonatalintensivecareunitinswedenadescriptivestudy
AT sahlenhelmercharlotte externalbarriersforincludingparentsofpreterminfantsinarandomisedclinicaltrialintheneonatalintensivecareunitinswedenadescriptivestudy
AT thernstromblomqvistylva externalbarriersforincludingparentsofpreterminfantsinarandomisedclinicaltrialintheneonatalintensivecareunitinswedenadescriptivestudy
AT angelhoffcharlotte externalbarriersforincludingparentsofpreterminfantsinarandomisedclinicaltrialintheneonatalintensivecareunitinswedenadescriptivestudy