Cargando…

Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater

Wastewater based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a reliable strategy to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Recent publications suggest that SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater is technically feasible; however, many different protocols are available and most of the methods appl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Cataluña, Alba, Cuevas-Ferrando, Enric, Randazzo, Walter, Falcó, Irene, Allende, Ana, Sánchez, Gloria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143870
_version_ 1783620186186711040
author Pérez-Cataluña, Alba
Cuevas-Ferrando, Enric
Randazzo, Walter
Falcó, Irene
Allende, Ana
Sánchez, Gloria
author_facet Pérez-Cataluña, Alba
Cuevas-Ferrando, Enric
Randazzo, Walter
Falcó, Irene
Allende, Ana
Sánchez, Gloria
author_sort Pérez-Cataluña, Alba
collection PubMed
description Wastewater based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a reliable strategy to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Recent publications suggest that SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater is technically feasible; however, many different protocols are available and most of the methods applied have not been properly validated. To this end, different procedures to concentrate and extract inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and surrogates were initially evaluated. Urban wastewater seeded with gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and mengovirus (MgV) was used to test the concentration efficiency of an aluminum-based adsorption-precipitation method and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation protocol. Moreover, two different RNA extraction methods were compared in this study: a commercial manual spin column centrifugation kit and an automated protocol based on magnetic silica beads. Overall, the evaluated concentration methods did not impact the recovery of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 nor MgV, while extraction methods showed significant differences for PEDV. Mean recovery rates of 42.9 ± 9.5%, 27.5 ± 14.3% and 9.0 ± 2.2% were obtained for gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, PEDV and MgV, respectively. Limits of detection (LoD(95%)) for five genomic SARS-CoV-2 targets (N1, N2, gene E, IP2 and IP4) ranged from 1.56 log genome equivalents (ge)/mL (N1) to 2.22 log ge/mL (IP4) when automated system was used; while values ranging between 2.08 (N1) and 2.34 (E) log ge/mL were observed when using column-based extraction method. Different targets were also evaluated in naturally contaminated wastewater samples with 91.2%, 85.3%, 70.6%, 79.4% and 73.5% positivity, for N1, N2, E, IP2 and IP4, respectively. Our benchmarked comparison study suggests that the aluminum precipitation method coupled with the automated nucleic extraction represents a method of acceptable sensitivity to provide readily results of interest for SARS-CoV-2 WBE surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77226042020-12-10 Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater Pérez-Cataluña, Alba Cuevas-Ferrando, Enric Randazzo, Walter Falcó, Irene Allende, Ana Sánchez, Gloria Sci Total Environ Article Wastewater based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a reliable strategy to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Recent publications suggest that SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater is technically feasible; however, many different protocols are available and most of the methods applied have not been properly validated. To this end, different procedures to concentrate and extract inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and surrogates were initially evaluated. Urban wastewater seeded with gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and mengovirus (MgV) was used to test the concentration efficiency of an aluminum-based adsorption-precipitation method and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation protocol. Moreover, two different RNA extraction methods were compared in this study: a commercial manual spin column centrifugation kit and an automated protocol based on magnetic silica beads. Overall, the evaluated concentration methods did not impact the recovery of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 nor MgV, while extraction methods showed significant differences for PEDV. Mean recovery rates of 42.9 ± 9.5%, 27.5 ± 14.3% and 9.0 ± 2.2% were obtained for gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, PEDV and MgV, respectively. Limits of detection (LoD(95%)) for five genomic SARS-CoV-2 targets (N1, N2, gene E, IP2 and IP4) ranged from 1.56 log genome equivalents (ge)/mL (N1) to 2.22 log ge/mL (IP4) when automated system was used; while values ranging between 2.08 (N1) and 2.34 (E) log ge/mL were observed when using column-based extraction method. Different targets were also evaluated in naturally contaminated wastewater samples with 91.2%, 85.3%, 70.6%, 79.4% and 73.5% positivity, for N1, N2, E, IP2 and IP4, respectively. Our benchmarked comparison study suggests that the aluminum precipitation method coupled with the automated nucleic extraction represents a method of acceptable sensitivity to provide readily results of interest for SARS-CoV-2 WBE surveillance. Elsevier B.V. 2021-03-01 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7722604/ /pubmed/33338788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143870 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Pérez-Cataluña, Alba
Cuevas-Ferrando, Enric
Randazzo, Walter
Falcó, Irene
Allende, Ana
Sánchez, Gloria
Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title_full Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title_fullStr Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title_short Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
title_sort comparing analytical methods to detect sars-cov-2 in wastewater
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143870
work_keys_str_mv AT perezcatalunaalba comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater
AT cuevasferrandoenric comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater
AT randazzowalter comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater
AT falcoirene comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater
AT allendeana comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater
AT sanchezgloria comparinganalyticalmethodstodetectsarscov2inwastewater