Cargando…

Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant placement has many potential advantages in immediate breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in these surgeries. ADM meshing may enhance integration, decrease seroma and infection rates, and reduce surgical costs. METHODS: This was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheflan, Michael, Allweis, Tanir M., Ben Yehuda, Dafna, Maisel Lotan, Adi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33299724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003265
_version_ 1783620189679517696
author Scheflan, Michael
Allweis, Tanir M.
Ben Yehuda, Dafna
Maisel Lotan, Adi
author_facet Scheflan, Michael
Allweis, Tanir M.
Ben Yehuda, Dafna
Maisel Lotan, Adi
author_sort Scheflan, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant placement has many potential advantages in immediate breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in these surgeries. ADM meshing may enhance integration, decrease seroma and infection rates, and reduce surgical costs. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of 49 women (71 breasts) undergoing immediate, prepectoral, implant-based breast reconstruction with 2:1 meshed, bovine-derived ADM (SurgiMend). Outcomes were compared against those of 77 patients (105 breasts) undergoing a similar procedure but with partial subpectoral implant placement. RESULTS: In the prepectoral group, the mean age was 49.1 years and mean body mass index was 24.7 kg/m(2). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics versus the partial subpectoral control group. Mean follow-up was 18.6 months (prepectoral) and 21.3 months (partial subpectoral). Mean time to drain removal was reduced in the prepectoral group (6.5 versus 8.5 days; P < 0.001). Rates of minor and major complications with prepectoral implant placement were 15.5% and 11.3%, respectively – similar to partial subpectoral placement (15.2% and 14.3%) (overall P = 0.690). Capsular contracture and explantation were associated with radiation therapy, and rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral implant placement with meshed ADM is a safe and reproducible alternative to partial muscle coverage with meshed ADM. Recovery may be easier and animation deformity avoided. It could therefore become the standard of care for implant-based breast reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77226192020-12-08 Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Scheflan, Michael Allweis, Tanir M. Ben Yehuda, Dafna Maisel Lotan, Adi Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant placement has many potential advantages in immediate breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in these surgeries. ADM meshing may enhance integration, decrease seroma and infection rates, and reduce surgical costs. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of 49 women (71 breasts) undergoing immediate, prepectoral, implant-based breast reconstruction with 2:1 meshed, bovine-derived ADM (SurgiMend). Outcomes were compared against those of 77 patients (105 breasts) undergoing a similar procedure but with partial subpectoral implant placement. RESULTS: In the prepectoral group, the mean age was 49.1 years and mean body mass index was 24.7 kg/m(2). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics versus the partial subpectoral control group. Mean follow-up was 18.6 months (prepectoral) and 21.3 months (partial subpectoral). Mean time to drain removal was reduced in the prepectoral group (6.5 versus 8.5 days; P < 0.001). Rates of minor and major complications with prepectoral implant placement were 15.5% and 11.3%, respectively – similar to partial subpectoral placement (15.2% and 14.3%) (overall P = 0.690). Capsular contracture and explantation were associated with radiation therapy, and rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral implant placement with meshed ADM is a safe and reproducible alternative to partial muscle coverage with meshed ADM. Recovery may be easier and animation deformity avoided. It could therefore become the standard of care for implant-based breast reconstruction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7722619/ /pubmed/33299724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003265 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Scheflan, Michael
Allweis, Tanir M.
Ben Yehuda, Dafna
Maisel Lotan, Adi
Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_short Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
title_sort meshed acellular dermal matrix in immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33299724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003265
work_keys_str_mv AT scheflanmichael meshedacellulardermalmatrixinimmediateprepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT allweistanirm meshedacellulardermalmatrixinimmediateprepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT benyehudadafna meshedacellulardermalmatrixinimmediateprepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT maisellotanadi meshedacellulardermalmatrixinimmediateprepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction