Cargando…

Early improvements of individual symptoms as a predictor of treatment response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia

AIM: It is well accepted that early improvement with antipsychotics predicts subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has examined the contribution of individual symptoms rather than overall symptom severity as the predictors. Thus, we aimed to detect individual symptoms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogyu, Kamiyu, Noda, Yoshihiro, Yoshida, Kazunari, Kurose, Shin, Masuda, Fumi, Mimura, Yu, Nishida, Hana, Plitman, Eric, Tarumi, Ryosuke, Tsugawa, Sakiko, Wada, Masataka, Miyazaki, Takahiro, Uchida, Hiroyuki, Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel, Mimura, Masaru, Nakajima, Shinichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32180369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12103
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: It is well accepted that early improvement with antipsychotics predicts subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has examined the contribution of individual symptoms rather than overall symptom severity as the predictors. Thus, we aimed to detect individual symptoms whose improvements could predict subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine and examine whether a prediction model with individual symptoms would be superior to a model using overall symptom severity. METHODS: This study analyzed a dataset including 532 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in a 6‐week double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized trial of asenapine. Response to asenapine was defined as a ≥30% decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline to week 6. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations among response and PANSS total/individual item score improvements at week 1 or week 2. RESULTS: Response was associated with early improvement in the following PANSS items: disturbance of volition, active social avoidance, poor impulse control at week 1; and active social avoidance, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight at week 2. Prediction accuracy was almost compatible between the model with individual symptoms and the model with PANSS total score both at weeks 1 and 2 (Nagelkerke R (2): .51, .42 and .55, .54, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early improvement in negative symptoms, poor attention and impulse control, and lack of insight, in particular predicted subsequent treatment response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine as accurately as prediction based on overall symptom severity.