Cargando…

Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Safewards is an organisational approach to delivering inpatient mental health services. The aim of Safewards is to minimise the number of situations in which conflict arises between healthcare workers and patients that lead to the use of coercive interventions (restriction and/or conta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerdtz, Marie, Daniel, Catherine, Jarden, Rebecca, Kapp, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039109
_version_ 1783620226792816640
author Gerdtz, Marie
Daniel, Catherine
Jarden, Rebecca
Kapp, Suzanne
author_facet Gerdtz, Marie
Daniel, Catherine
Jarden, Rebecca
Kapp, Suzanne
author_sort Gerdtz, Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Safewards is an organisational approach to delivering inpatient mental health services. The aim of Safewards is to minimise the number of situations in which conflict arises between healthcare workers and patients that lead to the use of coercive interventions (restriction and/or containment). The Safewards Model has been developed, implemented and evaluated for its impact on all forms of containment. Safewards has been adopted as the recommended approach to preventing patient agitation and clinical aggression in some jurisdictions. Notwithstanding these recommendations, the outcomes of Safewards for staff and patients have not been comprehensively described. The aim of the scoping review is to describe (1) Safewards interventions; (2) how Safewards interventions have been implemented in healthcare settings; (3) outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of Safewards; (4) barriers and enablers to the uptake and sustainability of Safewards. This review will provide a foundation for further research and/or systematic review of the effectiveness of Safewards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Peer-reviewed manuscripts of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method research in English with be included for the period 01 January 2013– December 31st 2020. Electronic databases including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, Global Health, PsycINFO and Scopus will be searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and explanation and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol will be followed. Publications will be excluded if they do not include the required participants, concept or context. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles and abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this review is not required as the information to be collected is publicly available. There are no participants or safety considerations in this review of published literature. Key findings for future research and clinical practice will be disseminated though peer-reviewed publication, stakeholder reporting and conference presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7722816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77228162020-12-14 Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol Gerdtz, Marie Daniel, Catherine Jarden, Rebecca Kapp, Suzanne BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: Safewards is an organisational approach to delivering inpatient mental health services. The aim of Safewards is to minimise the number of situations in which conflict arises between healthcare workers and patients that lead to the use of coercive interventions (restriction and/or containment). The Safewards Model has been developed, implemented and evaluated for its impact on all forms of containment. Safewards has been adopted as the recommended approach to preventing patient agitation and clinical aggression in some jurisdictions. Notwithstanding these recommendations, the outcomes of Safewards for staff and patients have not been comprehensively described. The aim of the scoping review is to describe (1) Safewards interventions; (2) how Safewards interventions have been implemented in healthcare settings; (3) outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of Safewards; (4) barriers and enablers to the uptake and sustainability of Safewards. This review will provide a foundation for further research and/or systematic review of the effectiveness of Safewards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Peer-reviewed manuscripts of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method research in English with be included for the period 01 January 2013– December 31st 2020. Electronic databases including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, Global Health, PsycINFO and Scopus will be searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and explanation and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol will be followed. Publications will be excluded if they do not include the required participants, concept or context. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles and abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this review is not required as the information to be collected is publicly available. There are no participants or safety considerations in this review of published literature. Key findings for future research and clinical practice will be disseminated though peer-reviewed publication, stakeholder reporting and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7722816/ /pubmed/33293305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039109 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Gerdtz, Marie
Daniel, Catherine
Jarden, Rebecca
Kapp, Suzanne
Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title_full Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title_short Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
title_sort use of the safewards model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039109
work_keys_str_mv AT gerdtzmarie useofthesafewardsmodelinhealthcareservicesamixedmethodscopingreviewprotocol
AT danielcatherine useofthesafewardsmodelinhealthcareservicesamixedmethodscopingreviewprotocol
AT jardenrebecca useofthesafewardsmodelinhealthcareservicesamixedmethodscopingreviewprotocol
AT kappsuzanne useofthesafewardsmodelinhealthcareservicesamixedmethodscopingreviewprotocol