Cargando…
Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: This study carried out a scoping review of research on intimate partner violence to determine the extent to which studies on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women (15–24 years) have been conducted, and how different geographical areas are represente...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040641 |
_version_ | 1783620231122386944 |
---|---|
author | Maguele, Maria Suzana Taylor, Myra Khuzwayo, Nelisiwe |
author_facet | Maguele, Maria Suzana Taylor, Myra Khuzwayo, Nelisiwe |
author_sort | Maguele, Maria Suzana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study carried out a scoping review of research on intimate partner violence to determine the extent to which studies on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women (15–24 years) have been conducted, and how different geographical areas are represented. It also considered whether the methodologies used were sufficient to describe the risk factors, prevalence and health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence among young women. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Online databases were used to identify studies published between 2008 and 2019. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines by Arksey and O’Malley were used to select studies, and primary studies were assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, V.2011. Thematic content analysis was used to summarise the findings of the scoping review. RESULTS: The majority of publications eight (61.5%) reported cross-sectional studies, while four (31.5%) were qualitative studies. One of the studies (7%) collected measured data. Overall, 13 (100%) of the publications examined factors influencing intimate partner violence. Using a customised quality assessment instrument, 12 (92.3%) of studies achieved a ‘high’-quality ranking with a score of 100%, and 7.7% of studies achieved an ‘average’ quality ranking with a score of 75%. CONCLUSIONS: While the quality of the studies is generally high, researches on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women would benefit from a careful selection of methods and reference standards, including direct measures of the violence affecting young women. Prospective cohort studies are required linking early exposure with individual, sociocultural and community factors, and detailing the abuse experienced from childhood, adolescence and youth. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018116463. SCOPING PROTOCOL PUBLICATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1234-y |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7722834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77228342020-12-14 Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review Maguele, Maria Suzana Taylor, Myra Khuzwayo, Nelisiwe BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: This study carried out a scoping review of research on intimate partner violence to determine the extent to which studies on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women (15–24 years) have been conducted, and how different geographical areas are represented. It also considered whether the methodologies used were sufficient to describe the risk factors, prevalence and health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence among young women. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Online databases were used to identify studies published between 2008 and 2019. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines by Arksey and O’Malley were used to select studies, and primary studies were assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, V.2011. Thematic content analysis was used to summarise the findings of the scoping review. RESULTS: The majority of publications eight (61.5%) reported cross-sectional studies, while four (31.5%) were qualitative studies. One of the studies (7%) collected measured data. Overall, 13 (100%) of the publications examined factors influencing intimate partner violence. Using a customised quality assessment instrument, 12 (92.3%) of studies achieved a ‘high’-quality ranking with a score of 100%, and 7.7% of studies achieved an ‘average’ quality ranking with a score of 75%. CONCLUSIONS: While the quality of the studies is generally high, researches on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women would benefit from a careful selection of methods and reference standards, including direct measures of the violence affecting young women. Prospective cohort studies are required linking early exposure with individual, sociocultural and community factors, and detailing the abuse experienced from childhood, adolescence and youth. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018116463. SCOPING PROTOCOL PUBLICATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1234-y BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7722834/ /pubmed/33293315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040641 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Maguele, Maria Suzana Taylor, Myra Khuzwayo, Nelisiwe Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title | Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title_full | Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title_short | Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review |
title_sort | evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-saharan africa: a scoping review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maguelemariasuzana evidenceofsocioculturalfactorsinfluencingintimatepartnerviolenceamongyoungwomeninsubsaharanafricaascopingreview AT taylormyra evidenceofsocioculturalfactorsinfluencingintimatepartnerviolenceamongyoungwomeninsubsaharanafricaascopingreview AT khuzwayonelisiwe evidenceofsocioculturalfactorsinfluencingintimatepartnerviolenceamongyoungwomeninsubsaharanafricaascopingreview |