Cargando…
Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies
In aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunions after failed conservative treatment, the recommended treatment is a reamed intramedullary (IM) nail. Typically, when an aseptic tibial nonunion previously treated with an IM nail is found, it is advisable to change the previous IM nail for a larger diameter rea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190077 |
_version_ | 1783620256369999872 |
---|---|
author | Gálvez-Sirvent, Elena Ibarzábal-Gil, Aitor Rodríguez-Merchán, E. Carlos |
author_facet | Gálvez-Sirvent, Elena Ibarzábal-Gil, Aitor Rodríguez-Merchán, E. Carlos |
author_sort | Gálvez-Sirvent, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | In aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunions after failed conservative treatment, the recommended treatment is a reamed intramedullary (IM) nail. Typically, when an aseptic tibial nonunion previously treated with an IM nail is found, it is advisable to change the previous IM nail for a larger diameter reamed and locked IM nail (the rate of success of renailing is around 90%). A second change after an IM nail failure is also a good option, especially if bone healing has progressed after the first change. Fibular osteotomy is not routinely advised; it is only recommended when it interferes with the nonunion site. In delayed unions before 24 weeks, IM nail dynamization can be performed as a less invasive option before deciding on a nail change. If there is a bone defect, a bone graft must be recommended, with the gold standard being the autologous iliac crest bone graft (AICBG). A reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system might also obtain a bone autograft that is comparable to AICBG. Although the size of the bone defect suitable to perform bone transport techniques is a controversial issue, we believe that such techniques can be considered in bone defects > 3 cm. Non-invasive therapies and biologic therapies could be applied in isolation for patients with high surgical risk, or could be used as adjuvants to the aforementioned surgical treatments. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:835-844. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190077 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7722944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77229442020-12-10 Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies Gálvez-Sirvent, Elena Ibarzábal-Gil, Aitor Rodríguez-Merchán, E. Carlos EFORT Open Rev Trauma In aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunions after failed conservative treatment, the recommended treatment is a reamed intramedullary (IM) nail. Typically, when an aseptic tibial nonunion previously treated with an IM nail is found, it is advisable to change the previous IM nail for a larger diameter reamed and locked IM nail (the rate of success of renailing is around 90%). A second change after an IM nail failure is also a good option, especially if bone healing has progressed after the first change. Fibular osteotomy is not routinely advised; it is only recommended when it interferes with the nonunion site. In delayed unions before 24 weeks, IM nail dynamization can be performed as a less invasive option before deciding on a nail change. If there is a bone defect, a bone graft must be recommended, with the gold standard being the autologous iliac crest bone graft (AICBG). A reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system might also obtain a bone autograft that is comparable to AICBG. Although the size of the bone defect suitable to perform bone transport techniques is a controversial issue, we believe that such techniques can be considered in bone defects > 3 cm. Non-invasive therapies and biologic therapies could be applied in isolation for patients with high surgical risk, or could be used as adjuvants to the aforementioned surgical treatments. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:835-844. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190077 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7722944/ /pubmed/33312710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190077 Text en © 2020 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. |
spellingShingle | Trauma Gálvez-Sirvent, Elena Ibarzábal-Gil, Aitor Rodríguez-Merchán, E. Carlos Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title | Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title_full | Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title_fullStr | Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title_short | Treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: A review of selected studies |
title_sort | treatment options for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion: a review of selected studies |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7722944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galvezsirventelena treatmentoptionsforaseptictibialdiaphysealnonunionareviewofselectedstudies AT ibarzabalgilaitor treatmentoptionsforaseptictibialdiaphysealnonunionareviewofselectedstudies AT rodriguezmerchanecarlos treatmentoptionsforaseptictibialdiaphysealnonunionareviewofselectedstudies |