Cargando…

Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moges, Getachew, Belete, Lielet, Mengesha, Yohannes, Ahmed, Solomon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304108
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S280442
_version_ 1783620271981199360
author Moges, Getachew
Belete, Lielet
Mengesha, Yohannes
Ahmed, Solomon
author_facet Moges, Getachew
Belete, Lielet
Mengesha, Yohannes
Ahmed, Solomon
author_sort Moges, Getachew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are increasing and worsening patients’ quality of life. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections. METHODS: Institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured data abstraction format on patients who were attending at the surgical ward of Borumeda hospital from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. The data were collected during July 15–30, 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 227 surgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression was computed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical site infections was 46.7%. Prophylaxis was administered to 188 (82.8%) surgical cases. Prophylaxis was recommended for 151 (66.5%). Out of these, only 143 (94.7%) received prophylaxis. One hundred seventy-four (78.4%) of the procedures had appropriate indication. The compliance of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use was 13.7%. The predictors of surgical site infections were receiving prophylaxis more than 24 h after surgery (AOR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.22–10.17), clean-contaminated wounds (AOR=4.54, 95% CI: 1.33–15.53), surgical procedure of thyroidectomy (AOR=5.2, 95% CI: 0.9–21.4), appendectomy (AOR = 29, 95% CI: 6.2–141.7), cholecystectomy (AOR = 21, 95% CI: 3.5 −126.7), hernia (AOR= 8.8, 95% CI: 1.2–62.2), skin and deep tissue (AOR = 125, 95% CI: 7.8–196.7), and orthopedic (AOR=57, 95% CI: 1.6–209.5). CONCLUSION: There was high inconsistency between surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and international surgical site infections prevention guideline. Wrong selection of antimicrobial agents was the most noncompliant to the guidelines. The incidence of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was high and requires due attention. The duration of postoperative prophylaxis should be kept to less than 24 h.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77230292020-12-09 Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Moges, Getachew Belete, Lielet Mengesha, Yohannes Ahmed, Solomon Drug Healthc Patient Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are increasing and worsening patients’ quality of life. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections. METHODS: Institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured data abstraction format on patients who were attending at the surgical ward of Borumeda hospital from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. The data were collected during July 15–30, 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 227 surgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression was computed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical site infections was 46.7%. Prophylaxis was administered to 188 (82.8%) surgical cases. Prophylaxis was recommended for 151 (66.5%). Out of these, only 143 (94.7%) received prophylaxis. One hundred seventy-four (78.4%) of the procedures had appropriate indication. The compliance of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use was 13.7%. The predictors of surgical site infections were receiving prophylaxis more than 24 h after surgery (AOR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.22–10.17), clean-contaminated wounds (AOR=4.54, 95% CI: 1.33–15.53), surgical procedure of thyroidectomy (AOR=5.2, 95% CI: 0.9–21.4), appendectomy (AOR = 29, 95% CI: 6.2–141.7), cholecystectomy (AOR = 21, 95% CI: 3.5 −126.7), hernia (AOR= 8.8, 95% CI: 1.2–62.2), skin and deep tissue (AOR = 125, 95% CI: 7.8–196.7), and orthopedic (AOR=57, 95% CI: 1.6–209.5). CONCLUSION: There was high inconsistency between surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and international surgical site infections prevention guideline. Wrong selection of antimicrobial agents was the most noncompliant to the guidelines. The incidence of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was high and requires due attention. The duration of postoperative prophylaxis should be kept to less than 24 h. Dove 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7723029/ /pubmed/33304108 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S280442 Text en © 2020 Moges et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Moges, Getachew
Belete, Lielet
Mengesha, Yohannes
Ahmed, Solomon
Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort evaluation of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and incidence of surgical site infection at borumeda hospital, northeast ethiopia: retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304108
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S280442
work_keys_str_mv AT mogesgetachew evaluationofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisandincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionatborumedahospitalnortheastethiopiaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT beletelielet evaluationofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisandincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionatborumedahospitalnortheastethiopiaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT mengeshayohannes evaluationofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisandincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionatborumedahospitalnortheastethiopiaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT ahmedsolomon evaluationofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisandincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionatborumedahospitalnortheastethiopiaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy