Cargando…

Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool

OBJECTIVES: Individual anatomical biomarkers have limited power for the classification of autism. The present study introduces a multivariate classification approach using structural magnetic resonance imaging data from individuals with and without autism. METHODS: The classifier utilizes z‐normaliz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarovic, Darko, Hadjikhani, Nouchine, Schneiderman, Justin, Lundström, Sebastian, Gillberg, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1846
_version_ 1783620292107567104
author Sarovic, Darko
Hadjikhani, Nouchine
Schneiderman, Justin
Lundström, Sebastian
Gillberg, Christopher
author_facet Sarovic, Darko
Hadjikhani, Nouchine
Schneiderman, Justin
Lundström, Sebastian
Gillberg, Christopher
author_sort Sarovic, Darko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Individual anatomical biomarkers have limited power for the classification of autism. The present study introduces a multivariate classification approach using structural magnetic resonance imaging data from individuals with and without autism. METHODS: The classifier utilizes z‐normalization, parameter weighting, and interindividual comparison on brain segmentation data, for estimation of an individual summed total index (TI). The TI indicates whether the gross morphological pattern of each individual's brain is in the direction of cases or controls. RESULTS: Morphometric analysis found significant differences within subcortical gray matter structures and limbic areas. There was no significant difference in total brain volume. A case‐control pilot‐study of TIs in normally intelligent individuals with autism (24) and without (21) yielded a maximal accuracy of 78.9% following cross‐validation. It showed a high accuracy compared with machine learning methods when tested on the same dataset. The TI correlated well with the autism quotient (R = 0.51) across groups. CONCLUSION: These results are on par with studies on autism using machine learning. The main contributions are its transparency and simplicity. The possibility of including additional neuroimaging data further increases the potential of the classifier as a diagnostic aid for neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as a research tool for neuroscientific investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77231952020-12-11 Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool Sarovic, Darko Hadjikhani, Nouchine Schneiderman, Justin Lundström, Sebastian Gillberg, Christopher Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Individual anatomical biomarkers have limited power for the classification of autism. The present study introduces a multivariate classification approach using structural magnetic resonance imaging data from individuals with and without autism. METHODS: The classifier utilizes z‐normalization, parameter weighting, and interindividual comparison on brain segmentation data, for estimation of an individual summed total index (TI). The TI indicates whether the gross morphological pattern of each individual's brain is in the direction of cases or controls. RESULTS: Morphometric analysis found significant differences within subcortical gray matter structures and limbic areas. There was no significant difference in total brain volume. A case‐control pilot‐study of TIs in normally intelligent individuals with autism (24) and without (21) yielded a maximal accuracy of 78.9% following cross‐validation. It showed a high accuracy compared with machine learning methods when tested on the same dataset. The TI correlated well with the autism quotient (R = 0.51) across groups. CONCLUSION: These results are on par with studies on autism using machine learning. The main contributions are its transparency and simplicity. The possibility of including additional neuroimaging data further increases the potential of the classifier as a diagnostic aid for neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as a research tool for neuroscientific investigations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7723195/ /pubmed/32945591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1846 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sarovic, Darko
Hadjikhani, Nouchine
Schneiderman, Justin
Lundström, Sebastian
Gillberg, Christopher
Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title_full Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title_fullStr Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title_full_unstemmed Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title_short Autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
title_sort autism classified by magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study of a potential diagnostic tool
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1846
work_keys_str_mv AT sarovicdarko autismclassifiedbymagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudyofapotentialdiagnostictool
AT hadjikhaninouchine autismclassifiedbymagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudyofapotentialdiagnostictool
AT schneidermanjustin autismclassifiedbymagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudyofapotentialdiagnostictool
AT lundstromsebastian autismclassifiedbymagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudyofapotentialdiagnostictool
AT gillbergchristopher autismclassifiedbymagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudyofapotentialdiagnostictool