TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. METHODS: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN, MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO, KANAS, MICHEL, SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO, ASTUR, NELSON, WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2020
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202806238460
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. METHODS: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. RESULTS: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). CONCLUSION: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.

Ejemplares similares