Cargando…

TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. METHODS: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN, MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO, KANAS, MICHEL, SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO, ASTUR, NELSON, WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202806238460
_version_ 1783620326532317184
author SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN
MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS, MICHEL
SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR, NELSON
WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO
author_facet SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN
MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS, MICHEL
SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR, NELSON
WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO
author_sort SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. METHODS: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. RESULTS: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). CONCLUSION: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77233862020-12-15 TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO KANAS, MICHEL SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO ASTUR, NELSON WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. METHODS: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. RESULTS: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). CONCLUSION: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study. ATHA EDITORA 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7723386/ /pubmed/33328786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202806238460 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
SORPRESO, RENATO SCAPUCIN
MARTINS, DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS, MICHEL
SORPRESO, ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR, NELSON
WAJCHENBERG, MARCELO
TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_full TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_fullStr TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_full_unstemmed TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_short TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_sort transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis: comparison between autograft and cage in peek
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202806238460
work_keys_str_mv AT sorpresorenatoscapucin transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek
AT martinsdelioeulalio transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek
AT kanasmichel transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek
AT sorpresoisabelcristinaesposito transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek
AT asturnelson transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek
AT wajchenbergmarcelo transforaminalintersomaticlumbararthrodesiscomparisonbetweenautograftandcageinpeek