Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IODs) represent an effective and reliable treatment modality for edentulous patients. The present retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of IODs using bar attachment (BA) system with those using magnetic attachment (MA) system after f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Huan, Jiao, Yang, Ma, Chu-Fan, Wang, Chao, Zhao, San-Jun, Tian, Min, Tay, Franklin R., Chen, Ji-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313105
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2531
_version_ 1783620356797366272
author Zhou, Huan
Jiao, Yang
Ma, Chu-Fan
Wang, Chao
Zhao, San-Jun
Tian, Min
Tay, Franklin R.
Chen, Ji-Hua
author_facet Zhou, Huan
Jiao, Yang
Ma, Chu-Fan
Wang, Chao
Zhao, San-Jun
Tian, Min
Tay, Franklin R.
Chen, Ji-Hua
author_sort Zhou, Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IODs) represent an effective and reliable treatment modality for edentulous patients. The present retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of IODs using bar attachment (BA) system with those using magnetic attachment (MA) system after functioning for up to 5 years. METHODS: Human subjects treated with IODs between 01-01-2010 and 12-31-2014 were identified from patient records. Of the 54 subjects who met the inclusion criteria, 48 subjects including 26 treated with BA-IODs and 22 with MA-IODs (96 mandibular implants) were recruited for the study. The implant units and prostheses were evaluated individually for peri-implant health. Prosthetic complications and maintenance during follow-up were recorded. The subjects responded to the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires for evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). RESULTS: The survival rates of the implants and prostheses were 96.9% and 95.8%, respectively, over a mean observation period of 48±11.3 (range, 13–64) months. Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and plaque index (PI) were significantly better for the MA group compared with the BA group (P<0.05), while marginal bone loss (MBL) and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) showed no significant differences (P>0.05). Prosthetic complications and maintenance were attachment-dependent. Most recruited subjects were satisfied with their prostheses. There was no statistically significant difference regarding general patient satisfaction or OHRQoL between the two groups (P>0.05). Nevertheless, patients complained that the BA-IODs were significantly more difficult to clean than the MA-IODs (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IODs have an ideal medium-term outcome irrespective of the attachment design. It is recommended that oral hygiene instructions and regular clinical examination be given to subjects wearing IODs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77235262020-12-10 Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study Zhou, Huan Jiao, Yang Ma, Chu-Fan Wang, Chao Zhao, San-Jun Tian, Min Tay, Franklin R. Chen, Ji-Hua Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IODs) represent an effective and reliable treatment modality for edentulous patients. The present retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of IODs using bar attachment (BA) system with those using magnetic attachment (MA) system after functioning for up to 5 years. METHODS: Human subjects treated with IODs between 01-01-2010 and 12-31-2014 were identified from patient records. Of the 54 subjects who met the inclusion criteria, 48 subjects including 26 treated with BA-IODs and 22 with MA-IODs (96 mandibular implants) were recruited for the study. The implant units and prostheses were evaluated individually for peri-implant health. Prosthetic complications and maintenance during follow-up were recorded. The subjects responded to the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires for evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). RESULTS: The survival rates of the implants and prostheses were 96.9% and 95.8%, respectively, over a mean observation period of 48±11.3 (range, 13–64) months. Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and plaque index (PI) were significantly better for the MA group compared with the BA group (P<0.05), while marginal bone loss (MBL) and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) showed no significant differences (P>0.05). Prosthetic complications and maintenance were attachment-dependent. Most recruited subjects were satisfied with their prostheses. There was no statistically significant difference regarding general patient satisfaction or OHRQoL between the two groups (P>0.05). Nevertheless, patients complained that the BA-IODs were significantly more difficult to clean than the MA-IODs (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IODs have an ideal medium-term outcome irrespective of the attachment design. It is recommended that oral hygiene instructions and regular clinical examination be given to subjects wearing IODs. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7723526/ /pubmed/33313105 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2531 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhou, Huan
Jiao, Yang
Ma, Chu-Fan
Wang, Chao
Zhao, San-Jun
Tian, Min
Tay, Franklin R.
Chen, Ji-Hua
Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title_full Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title_short Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
title_sort clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313105
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2531
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhuan clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT jiaoyang clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT machufan clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT wangchao clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT zhaosanjun clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT tianmin clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT tayfranklinr clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy
AT chenjihua clinicaloutcomesofimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesusingthebarandmagneticattachmentsystemsanupto5yearretrospectivestudy