Cargando…

Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND: In the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, gallbladder (GB) intraepithelial lesions are grouped as flat or tumoral, according to their morphological features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the morphologies and clinical features of GB ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hongbeom, Jang, Jin-Young, Chang, Jihoon, Kim, Haeryoung, Byun, Yoonhyeong, Kim, Jae Ri, Kwon, Wooil, Kim, Sun-Whe, Lee, Kyoung-Bun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313158
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-432
_version_ 1783620363194728448
author Kim, Hongbeom
Jang, Jin-Young
Chang, Jihoon
Kim, Haeryoung
Byun, Yoonhyeong
Kim, Jae Ri
Kwon, Wooil
Kim, Sun-Whe
Lee, Kyoung-Bun
author_facet Kim, Hongbeom
Jang, Jin-Young
Chang, Jihoon
Kim, Haeryoung
Byun, Yoonhyeong
Kim, Jae Ri
Kwon, Wooil
Kim, Sun-Whe
Lee, Kyoung-Bun
author_sort Kim, Hongbeom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, gallbladder (GB) intraepithelial lesions are grouped as flat or tumoral, according to their morphological features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the morphologies and clinical features of GB cancer (GBC) and to examine the feasibility of using morphologic classification as a prognostic factor. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2012, the available pathologic slide reviews of 381 patients were analyzed at the Seoul National University Hospital. All pathologic slides were evaluated by two pancreato-biliary tract pathology experts. GBCs were categorized into eight groups (Flat: F1-2, Borderline, Tumoral: Tu1-5), according to the thickness of the mucosal lesion, histologic patterns of the mucosa under microscopy, invasion extent, and patient history of premalignant lesions. According to the morphologic classification, clinical features were compared and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: In three groups, flat lesions comprised 179 (46.9%) cases and borderline and tumoral comprised 97 (25.4%) and 105 (27.5%) cases, respectively. More favorable pathologic and clinical results were found within the tumoral group. The borderline group had an intermediate tendency between flat and intraluminal in clinicopathologic parameters. In the curative resected T2 stage group, the borderline group demonstrated an intermediate trend compared to that of the flat and tumoral groups, but this was statistically insignificant (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Flat type GBCs show worse prognosis than tumoral GBCs. The morphological classifications between flat and tumoral on the basis of 1 cm and by papillary feature is feasible. Tumor morphology can be used as a reference while deciding the treatment plan, especially in T2 GBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77235532020-12-10 Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer Kim, Hongbeom Jang, Jin-Young Chang, Jihoon Kim, Haeryoung Byun, Yoonhyeong Kim, Jae Ri Kwon, Wooil Kim, Sun-Whe Lee, Kyoung-Bun Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: In the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, gallbladder (GB) intraepithelial lesions are grouped as flat or tumoral, according to their morphological features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the morphologies and clinical features of GB cancer (GBC) and to examine the feasibility of using morphologic classification as a prognostic factor. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2012, the available pathologic slide reviews of 381 patients were analyzed at the Seoul National University Hospital. All pathologic slides were evaluated by two pancreato-biliary tract pathology experts. GBCs were categorized into eight groups (Flat: F1-2, Borderline, Tumoral: Tu1-5), according to the thickness of the mucosal lesion, histologic patterns of the mucosa under microscopy, invasion extent, and patient history of premalignant lesions. According to the morphologic classification, clinical features were compared and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: In three groups, flat lesions comprised 179 (46.9%) cases and borderline and tumoral comprised 97 (25.4%) and 105 (27.5%) cases, respectively. More favorable pathologic and clinical results were found within the tumoral group. The borderline group had an intermediate tendency between flat and intraluminal in clinicopathologic parameters. In the curative resected T2 stage group, the borderline group demonstrated an intermediate trend compared to that of the flat and tumoral groups, but this was statistically insignificant (P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Flat type GBCs show worse prognosis than tumoral GBCs. The morphological classifications between flat and tumoral on the basis of 1 cm and by papillary feature is feasible. Tumor morphology can be used as a reference while deciding the treatment plan, especially in T2 GBC. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7723553/ /pubmed/33313158 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-432 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hongbeom
Jang, Jin-Young
Chang, Jihoon
Kim, Haeryoung
Byun, Yoonhyeong
Kim, Jae Ri
Kwon, Wooil
Kim, Sun-Whe
Lee, Kyoung-Bun
Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title_full Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title_fullStr Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title_short Clinical meaning of the World Health Organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
title_sort clinical meaning of the world health organization morphologic classification (flat vs. tumoral) of gallbladder intraepithelial neoplasm as a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313158
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-432
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhongbeom clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT jangjinyoung clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT changjihoon clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT kimhaeryoung clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT byunyoonhyeong clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT kimjaeri clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT kwonwooil clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT kimsunwhe clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer
AT leekyoungbun clinicalmeaningoftheworldhealthorganizationmorphologicclassificationflatvstumoralofgallbladderintraepithelialneoplasmasaprognosticfactoringallbladdercancer