Cargando…
Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients
BACKGROUND: Abdominal ventral rectopexy (AVR) with colectomy is controversial in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Literature data on this technique for ODS are very limited. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of AVR with colectomy for selected patients with ODS. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344596 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5976 |
_version_ | 1783620403401326592 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Li Li, Chun-Xue Tian, Yue Ye, Jing-Wang Li, Fan Tong, Wei-Dong |
author_facet | Wang, Li Li, Chun-Xue Tian, Yue Ye, Jing-Wang Li, Fan Tong, Wei-Dong |
author_sort | Wang, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Abdominal ventral rectopexy (AVR) with colectomy is controversial in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Literature data on this technique for ODS are very limited. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of AVR with colectomy for selected patients with ODS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent AVR with colectomy for ODS were identified prospectively from 2016 to 2017 in our department. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical results, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were collected and analyzed. Long-term follow-up was evaluated with standardized questionnaires. The severity of symptoms was assessed by the objective Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) and ODS Score. The quality of life was assessed by the Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score. Functional outcome was compared pre- and post-operatively for each patient. The primary outcomes were determined by the improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were operating time, postoperative length of stay, morbidity and mortality, improvement of pelvic floor structure, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Four patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery, and two patients underwent a laparoscopic-assisted procedure. The mean operating time for the robotic approach was 243 min (range 160–300 min), and the mean operating time for the laparoscopic approach was 230 min (range 220-240 min). The mean postoperative length of stay was 8.2 d (range 6-12 d). There was no conversion to open procedure and no postoperative mortality. No urinary retention, wound infection, prolonged ileus, pelvic infection and anastomosis leakage occurred. Six patients were followed up for 36 mo. The WCS, ODS, and Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score improved significantly postoperatively (P < 0.05). The WCS and ODS scores showed the best remission and stabilization at 6 to 12 mo after surgery. There was no recurrence or novel constipation after surgery. None of the patients used laxative medication. CONCLUSION: Robotic and laparoscopic-assisted ventral rectopexy with colectomy is a safe and effective procedure for selected patients with ODS. However, comprehensive preoperative evaluation and careful patient selection are essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7723726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77237262020-12-18 Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients Wang, Li Li, Chun-Xue Tian, Yue Ye, Jing-Wang Li, Fan Tong, Wei-Dong World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Abdominal ventral rectopexy (AVR) with colectomy is controversial in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Literature data on this technique for ODS are very limited. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of AVR with colectomy for selected patients with ODS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent AVR with colectomy for ODS were identified prospectively from 2016 to 2017 in our department. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical results, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were collected and analyzed. Long-term follow-up was evaluated with standardized questionnaires. The severity of symptoms was assessed by the objective Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) and ODS Score. The quality of life was assessed by the Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score. Functional outcome was compared pre- and post-operatively for each patient. The primary outcomes were determined by the improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were operating time, postoperative length of stay, morbidity and mortality, improvement of pelvic floor structure, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Four patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery, and two patients underwent a laparoscopic-assisted procedure. The mean operating time for the robotic approach was 243 min (range 160–300 min), and the mean operating time for the laparoscopic approach was 230 min (range 220-240 min). The mean postoperative length of stay was 8.2 d (range 6-12 d). There was no conversion to open procedure and no postoperative mortality. No urinary retention, wound infection, prolonged ileus, pelvic infection and anastomosis leakage occurred. Six patients were followed up for 36 mo. The WCS, ODS, and Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score improved significantly postoperatively (P < 0.05). The WCS and ODS scores showed the best remission and stabilization at 6 to 12 mo after surgery. There was no recurrence or novel constipation after surgery. None of the patients used laxative medication. CONCLUSION: Robotic and laparoscopic-assisted ventral rectopexy with colectomy is a safe and effective procedure for selected patients with ODS. However, comprehensive preoperative evaluation and careful patient selection are essential. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-12-06 2020-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7723726/ /pubmed/33344596 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5976 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Wang, Li Li, Chun-Xue Tian, Yue Ye, Jing-Wang Li, Fan Tong, Wei-Dong Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title | Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title_full | Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title_fullStr | Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title_short | Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients |
title_sort | abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: an alternative option for selected patients |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344596 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangli abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients AT lichunxue abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients AT tianyue abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients AT yejingwang abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients AT lifan abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients AT tongweidong abdominalventralrectopexywithcolectomyforobstructeddefecationsyndromeanalternativeoptionforselectedpatients |