Cargando…

Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saba, Nabil F., Blumenschein, George, Guigay, Joel, Licitra, Lisa, Fayette, Jerome, Harrington, Kevin J., Kiyota, Naomi, Gillison, Maura L., Ferris, Robert L., Jayaprakash, Vijayvel, Li, Li, Brossart, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017
_version_ 1783620422448709632
author Saba, Nabil F.
Blumenschein, George
Guigay, Joel
Licitra, Lisa
Fayette, Jerome
Harrington, Kevin J.
Kiyota, Naomi
Gillison, Maura L.
Ferris, Robert L.
Jayaprakash, Vijayvel
Li, Li
Brossart, Peter
author_facet Saba, Nabil F.
Blumenschein, George
Guigay, Joel
Licitra, Lisa
Fayette, Jerome
Harrington, Kevin J.
Kiyota, Naomi
Gillison, Maura L.
Ferris, Robert L.
Jayaprakash, Vijayvel
Li, Li
Brossart, Peter
author_sort Saba, Nabil F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). RESULTS: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (< 65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients < 65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02105636.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7723820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77238202020-12-09 Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age Saba, Nabil F. Blumenschein, George Guigay, Joel Licitra, Lisa Fayette, Jerome Harrington, Kevin J. Kiyota, Naomi Gillison, Maura L. Ferris, Robert L. Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Li, Li Brossart, Peter Oral Oncol Article OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). RESULTS: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (< 65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients < 65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02105636. 2019-07-03 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7723820/ /pubmed/31422216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Saba, Nabil F.
Blumenschein, George
Guigay, Joel
Licitra, Lisa
Fayette, Jerome
Harrington, Kevin J.
Kiyota, Naomi
Gillison, Maura L.
Ferris, Robert L.
Jayaprakash, Vijayvel
Li, Li
Brossart, Peter
Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title_full Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title_fullStr Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title_full_unstemmed Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title_short Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
title_sort nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: efficacy and safety in checkmate 141 by age
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017
work_keys_str_mv AT sabanabilf nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT blumenscheingeorge nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT guigayjoel nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT licitralisa nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT fayettejerome nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT harringtonkevinj nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT kiyotanaomi nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT gillisonmaural nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT ferrisrobertl nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT jayaprakashvijayvel nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT lili nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage
AT brossartpeter nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage