Cargando…
Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017 |
_version_ | 1783620422448709632 |
---|---|
author | Saba, Nabil F. Blumenschein, George Guigay, Joel Licitra, Lisa Fayette, Jerome Harrington, Kevin J. Kiyota, Naomi Gillison, Maura L. Ferris, Robert L. Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Li, Li Brossart, Peter |
author_facet | Saba, Nabil F. Blumenschein, George Guigay, Joel Licitra, Lisa Fayette, Jerome Harrington, Kevin J. Kiyota, Naomi Gillison, Maura L. Ferris, Robert L. Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Li, Li Brossart, Peter |
author_sort | Saba, Nabil F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). RESULTS: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (< 65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients < 65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02105636. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7723820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77238202020-12-09 Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age Saba, Nabil F. Blumenschein, George Guigay, Joel Licitra, Lisa Fayette, Jerome Harrington, Kevin J. Kiyota, Naomi Gillison, Maura L. Ferris, Robert L. Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Li, Li Brossart, Peter Oral Oncol Article OBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). RESULTS: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (< 65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients < 65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02105636. 2019-07-03 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7723820/ /pubmed/31422216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Saba, Nabil F. Blumenschein, George Guigay, Joel Licitra, Lisa Fayette, Jerome Harrington, Kevin J. Kiyota, Naomi Gillison, Maura L. Ferris, Robert L. Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Li, Li Brossart, Peter Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title | Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title_full | Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title_fullStr | Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title_full_unstemmed | Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title_short | Nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age |
title_sort | nivolumab versus investigator’s choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: efficacy and safety in checkmate 141 by age |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabanabilf nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT blumenscheingeorge nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT guigayjoel nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT licitralisa nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT fayettejerome nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT harringtonkevinj nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT kiyotanaomi nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT gillisonmaural nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT ferrisrobertl nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT jayaprakashvijayvel nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT lili nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage AT brossartpeter nivolumabversusinvestigatorschoiceinpatientswithrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckefficacyandsafetyincheckmate141byage |